One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
We need a secret v**e in the senate!!
Page <<first <prev 7 of 12 next> last>>
Jan 2, 2020 12:31:20   #
Auntie Dee
 
Gatsby wrote:
There will be a secret v**e, November 3rd; and boy are you ever going to regret this.



Reply
Jan 2, 2020 12:38:07   #
Auntie Dee
 
Saspatz007 wrote:
My favorite proposed solution is the Anticorruption Act which has been passed in a number of places.

https://anticorruptionact.org/whats-in-the-act/

It has become law in Alaska, parts of Arizona, California.
For a full list go to:
https://represent.us/our-wins/

I think this would go a long way.


Sounds good to me...and I'm a repub!

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 12:41:57   #
Auntie Dee
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Actually, the House's responsibility has 3 phases: 1, initiation of the impeachment process; (2) Judiciary Committee investigation, hearings, and markup of articles of impeachment; and (3) full House consideration of the articles of impeachment. In the case of President Trump, the House repeated phase 1 on an almost monthly timeline starting before he was sworn in. Phase 2 was incomplete as they did not question or interview anyone who disagreed or promoted a notion that the "phone call" was misunderstood or incorrectly surmised by the Democrats. This would have REQUIRED Schitt to allow witnesses called by Republicans. And phase 3 requires all available information, both pro and con, to be examined and weighted. Again, Nader shut down most questions raised by Republicans. So.....did they do their job as outlined in the 2019 The Impeachment Process in the House of Representatives. Absolutely not. They failed to approach the impeachment without bias or a predetermined outcome. Link to Process House of Representatives. This was written and revised by House Democrats, see https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45769.pdfin

While you contemplate the steps, pay attention to the "investigative phase" and the meaning of the word "investigate" the act of examining something carefully, esp. to discover the t***h about it. Investigation DOES NOT mean to dig for information to PROVE a person is either innocent or guilty, it means to find the t***h. Was this done? No!!!, research was done solely for a guilty outcome.
Actually, the House's responsibility has 3 phases:... (show quote)


Great explanation!

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2020 12:45:22   #
Auntie Dee
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Why was there no attempt by Republicans to find proof of innocence evidence?
Why can't one person can't take an oath and testify in Trump's defense??


Are you really that stupid? The law in this fine country does not require proof of innocence evidence! You are innocent until proven guilty...you are trying to put the shoe on the wrong foot!

Seems there has been a lot of you Dem's trying to change that law by declaring it to be something opposite than what it means...Devious Dem's are at it again!

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 12:47:51   #
Auntie Dee
 
4430 wrote:
Not a one of the so called witness when asked if they heard Trump a ply any pressure on the Ukraine President and Everyone of them said NO they did Not hear Trump tell them that they'd get no aid if they didn't look into Biden and his son !

You know you sound just as d********g as all these Democrats seeking to unseat a dully elected President from day one !

Why did they keep changing the rules and then when each article was found to be false then they changed to to bribery and then kept on inventing more charges till they are at the point where they now see they're screwed and look the fools that that they are !

All of you Trump h**ers are so blind because you all lost your sweet heart's chance to be the first woman President that proves you all can't see past the end of your noses !

The whole lot of ya are d********g pathetic
Not a one of the so called witness when asked if t... (show quote)



Reply
Jan 2, 2020 12:50:11   #
Auntie Dee
 
Peewee wrote:
It's believed that the money given to Ukraine was laundered and much of it was returned to US politicians.
That's how they get rich with foreign aid.


Right ON!

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 12:54:05   #
Auntie Dee
 
drlarrygino wrote:
The secret impeachment should be done in the House with the issue being to throw Nanny Peeloosli out of the House due to her bullying, lying, abusing her power, not abiding by her pledge to keep America safe from all external and internal attempts to o*******w our government and false accusations of a duly elected President. Since most democrats are afraid of senile Nancy and her withholding of funds if any demorat does not get on board with her corrupt agenda a secret v**e would kick the old nag out of office.
The secret impeachment should be done in the House... (show quote)


Wish I could v**e for that!

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2020 14:55:23   #
trashbaum
 
Lonewolf wrote:
We need a secret v**e in the impeachment trial that's the only chance at fairness we're going to get!


Fairness like Schiff gave the President, Fairness like Pelosi gave the President, Fairness like Schumer is giving the President ....Great scott you people are sick. Not to leave out the garden gnome

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 16:19:39   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
trashbaum wrote:
Fairness like Schiff gave the President, Fairness like Pelosi gave the President, Fairness like Schumer is giving the President ....Great scott you people are sick. Not to leave out the garden gnome


I don't know why people keep encouraging this guy by replying to stupid comments.

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 19:34:34   #
debeda
 
4430 wrote:
Please don't forget Romney's son he was on the take as well !


Yep. Good old RINO Romney

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 20:08:19   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Lonewolf wrote:
We need a secret v**e in the impeachment trial that's the only chance at fairness we're going to get!


Why are you suddenly concerned with fairness? You weren't concerned when the House tried Trump by lynch mob. You might also be surprised to find Democrats siding with the president if they could v**e secret b****t. Furthermore, if you open this ignorant door to secret b****t how would the people being represented hold their Congressmen and Senators accountable? Think before reacting!

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2020 20:18:11   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
padremike wrote:
Think before reacting!


Ole Lone just can't be accused of thinking he's just so filled with h**e his brain is frozen solid !

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 20:49:48   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
4430 wrote:
Ole Lone just can't be accused of thinking he's just so filled with h**e his brain is frozen solid !


Ain't that the T***h! He's becoming worse.

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 22:26:02   #
JoyV
 
Lonewolf wrote:
We need a secret v**e in the impeachment trial that's the only chance at fairness we're going to get!


Why would it be unfair to have the v****g recorded and available to the public like every other Senate v**e? And this is a very important issue to the public and to many's e******n choices. If ANY v**e should be t***sparent; this one should!!!!

Reply
Jan 2, 2020 22:28:10   #
JoyV
 
Lonewolf wrote:
What was unfair republican were well represented in the closed-door meetings and had plenty of opportunity to question Witnesses on the floor


Well represented? The few who were allowed in were NOT allowed to participate, only observe! But even if they had been; that would NOT be a reason for secrecy in the Senate v**e. There has been too much secrecy already!!!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.