no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

The Charlottesville Lie Must Die
Posted Dec 23, 2019 by Michael L. Brown

How can this happen in the 21st century, right in front of our eyes? How can a lie be manufactured, then mainstreamed, despite explicit video and written evidence to the contrary?

We’re not talking about a debate concerning the origins of the universe. (Sorry, but there were no human eyewitness, and the event wasn’t captured on camera.)

We’re not talking about whether a certain king conquered a certain country in 722 or 721 BC. (Ancient chronologies can be confusing.)

We’re talking about something that happened in 2017, live and on camera, followed by a press conference to make things totally clear. How can things get so twisted?

It’s called the power of the lie, and this same lie surfaced again in an article written by p**********l candidate Joe Biden, denouncing antisemitism in response to the Jersey City kosher grocery shootings.

Speaking of the hatred that united the Jersey City shooters and the synagogue shooters in Poway and Pittsburgh, Biden then blamed President Trump for this h**eful climate.

He said, “After Charlottesville, instead of condemning a naked display of hatred, Trump assigned a moral equivalence between those streaming through the night with torches, chanting anti-Semitic bile — and the courageous neighbors and activists who stood against them. He gave license and safe harbor to w***e s*********ts, Neo-N**is, and the KKK.”

He continued, “As I said after Charlottesville, we are in a battle for the soul of this nation. And, it’s why I am running for president.”

The only problem is that Trump did not say that “those streaming through the night with torches, chanting anti-Semitic bile” were very fine people.

To the contrary, on August 12, 2017, the day of the Charlottesville protests, he said, “I think there is blame on both sides.

“You had some very bad people in that group” (referring to those protesting the removal of a confederate statue). “But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.”

Then, two days later, Trump issued a categorical statement, saying, “R****m is evil and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-N**is, w***e s*********ts, and other h**e groups.”

How on earth could anyone get this wrong? And how on earth, now more than two years later, could former vice president Biden’s claim that, “He gave license and safe harbor to w***e s*********ts, Neo-N**is, and the KKK”?

Read Trump’s words again, then read Biden’s words again. This is willful misrepresentation.



Not only so, but the next day, on August 15, at a wide-ranging press conference, Trump said again that “we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.”

And in answer to another question, he explained exactly what he meant by the “very fine people.” He said, “You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

That’s who he was talking about.

Then, when asked if we should take down statues of Thomas Jefferson, he said, “OK. Good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major s***e owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue? So you know what? It’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people, and I’m not talking about the neo-N**is and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-N**is and white nationalists. OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You’ve got -- you had a lot of bad -- you had a lot of bad people in the other group…” (my emphasis).

Then, in the very next question, Trump was asked, “You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly?”

He responded, “No, no. There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before. If you look, they were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people -- neo-N**is, white nationalists, wh**ever you want to call them. . .” (my emphasis).

He could not have made himself clearer. And anyone with an open heart and mind – really, anyone who simply wanted to know the t***h – would understand exactly what he was saying.

What is so frightening is that people – millions of people – believe the lie. And they believe it to the point that, if you’re white and you v**ed for Trump, then you are, by default, a white nationalist, a r****t.

Of course, Trump’s cardinal sin was calling out hatred on the left as well as on the right, speaking against both neo-N**is and A****a.

And, given his comments in the past about Mexicans and Muslims, which were either exaggerated or taken out of context, it was all too easy to create the Charlottesville Lie.

Now, more than two years later, the top Democratic candidate for president, in an article denouncing antisemitism, can blame the president for antisemitic violence.

Adding to the irony is the fact that the Jersey City shooters were black s*********ts, not w***e s*********ts. And Biden’s article was posted on December 18, one week after Trump’s executive order combating antisemitism. Yet Trump is to blame for the shooting of these Jews.

May God help our nation pursue the t***h before a web of lies so entangles us that we can no longer find our way out.

Kevyn

What bothers me is the dishonesty, if you v**ed for and support Trump why not admit and take p***e in your r****m. I have more respect for some jackass who openly throws up Hail Hitler salutes or walks down the street in a Klan robe than an asswipe who has the same values and hides them, own who you are.

PeterS

I was with you until the part where Trump thought that some w***e s*********ts are "very fine people." Sorry, they are a lot of things and that summation makes them the very worst people on this planet. That Trump is unable to realize that is what is so disturbing, almost as disturbing as the people who continually defend him.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

He didn't state that some w***e s*********ts were very nice people...

Not all the folk protesting the removal of the statues were w***e s*********ts...

Some were truly fine folk who were upset at the removal of their history...

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

What bothers me is the stupidity...

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Well pete, you claim to be 'a very fine person', yet you vehemently h**e large groups of upstanding, hard working people.
What does that say about you?

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Now, now, now........don't interrupt the narrative, Canuck.
They like their bubbles intact.

debeda

Which is why I will never again v**e for a Democrat. If their lips are moving they're LYING

debeda

Well put

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

They can't even comprehend what you wrote, l*****ts traits, hard head thin skin.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

We all like our bubbles...

I just prefer mine to be t***sparent enough that some facts get through

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

I have never seen a true conservative throw up a Heil Hitler salute so that you could respect him. Foolish statement. Furthermore, Kevyn, you've proven, with practically every post, that you are not worthy of respect. You take so many cheap shots I wouldn't be surprised if you wash your toilet paper and reuse it.

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

Right hand food, left hand other end!

Lonewolf

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

I agree with you. A society that removes its past, soon forgets what progress it has made toward being a better people.That concerns me, and I would stand against the progressives who want to remove the past. What ever they claim, their true goal is the remaking the past to fit their lies. All I can think of is Ray Bradbury's "Fahrenheight 451