Seeking a scapegoat for Biden’s crimes: Democrats have shown great concern about even the possibility that there are connections between foreign powers and those in seats of power...

thebigp

Democrats have shown great concern about even the possibility that there are connections between foreign powers and those in seats of power within our federal government. That “concern” has been demonstrated by Democrats going so far as to conduct a thus-far endless stream of investigations, probes, and inquiries that have hung like a shadow over every day of Donald Trump’s presidency. But that concern is pretend, rather than genuine. In this case, the estrangement between “Democrats” and “genuine” is illustrated by the simple fact that their alleged concern does not extend to one of their own, despite his clear connections to a foreign power.
In fact, rather than investigate the apparent shady dealings with Ukraine of former vice president and current p**********l hopeful Joe Biden and his son H****r, Democrats used the scandal to (once again) attempt to turn the tables and dump the whole thing squarely in the lap of President Trump. Blaming Trump for his appropriate response to Biden’s inappropriate actions, Democrats claim that the president’s actions are grounds for impeachment.
As we will demonstrate, all available evidence shows it was not the president’s response that crossed ethical and possibly legal lines. Instead it was actions of both Joe and H****r B***n that crossed those lines.
Once again, all of this seems more than a bit familiar. Like the Russia collusion narrative that Democrats created out of thin air to take the public eye off Hillary Clinton’s illegal e-mail system and evidence of her accepting bribes by foreign powers, the Ukraine corruption angle is just another example of Democrats manufacturing supposedly illegal behaviour.
While there certainly was collusion between Russia and someone in a seat of power within our federal government, it simply wasn’t Donald Trump or anyone associated with his candidacy — unless that association is expanded to include his opponent and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.
Considering the rank corruption and quid pro quo of the pay-for-play policies of Hillary Clinton’s State Department during her tenure as secretary of state, “collusion” is definitely an appropriate word to describe the Uranium One scandal. In that underhanded scheme, a Russian state-owned company acquired between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium reserves while the coffers of the Clinton Foundation were stuffed with $145 million in “donations” (read: bribes) from those involved on the Russian side of the deal.
Four years later, as it became apparent that Donald Trump could give Clinton a run for her money in the 2016 e******n, Democrats accused him of colluding with Russia, despite lacking any evidence to back up their claims.
This is the same gambit all over again. No investigation of those who were actually involved in wrongdoing, but an all-in approach to investigating Trump.
SOURCE- MITCHELL SHAW

Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!

thebigp wrote:

Democrats have shown great concern about even the possibility that there are connections between foreign powers and those in seats of power within our federal government. That “concern” has been demonstrated by Democrats going so far as to conduct a thus-far endless stream of investigations, probes, and inquiries that have hung like a shadow over every day of Donald Trump’s presidency. But that concern is pretend, rather than genuine. In this case, the estrangement between “Democrats” and “genuine” is illustrated by the simple fact that their alleged concern does not extend to one of their own, despite his clear connections to a foreign power.
In fact, rather than investigate the apparent shady dealings with Ukraine of former vice president and current p**********l hopeful Joe Biden and his son H****r, Democrats used the scandal to (once again) attempt to turn the tables and dump the whole thing squarely in the lap of President Trump. Blaming Trump for his appropriate response to Biden’s inappropriate actions, Democrats claim that the president’s actions are grounds for impeachment.
As we will demonstrate, all available evidence shows it was not the president’s response that crossed ethical and possibly legal lines. Instead it was actions of both Joe and H****r B***n that crossed those lines.
Once again, all of this seems more than a bit familiar. Like the Russia collusion narrative that Democrats created out of thin air to take the public eye off Hillary Clinton’s illegal e-mail system and evidence of her accepting bribes by foreign powers, the Ukraine corruption angle is just another example of Democrats manufacturing supposedly illegal behaviour.
While there certainly was collusion between Russia and someone in a seat of power within our federal government, it simply wasn’t Donald Trump or anyone associated with his candidacy — unless that association is expanded to include his opponent and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.
Considering the rank corruption and quid pro quo of the pay-for-play policies of Hillary Clinton’s State Department during her tenure as secretary of state, “collusion” is definitely an appropriate word to describe the Uranium One scandal. In that underhanded scheme, a Russian state-owned company acquired between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium reserves while the coffers of the Clinton Foundation were stuffed with $145 million in “donations” (read: bribes) from those involved on the Russian side of the deal.
Four years later, as it became apparent that Donald Trump could give Clinton a run for her money in the 2016 e******n, Democrats accused him of colluding with Russia, despite lacking any evidence to back up their claims.
This is the same gambit all over again. No investigation of those who were actually involved in wrongdoing, but an all-in approach to investigating Trump.
SOURCE- MITCHELL SHAW

Democrats have shown great concern about even the ... (show quote)

Hallelujah

Do you Liberals finally get it this time?

Anyway you slice it

H****r B***n’s Trial begins on January 7th in Arkansas. Judge McSpadden, residing.
Full blown investigations will follow.
MAGA PRESIDENT TRUMP

Bosty Loc: South jersey

Ya-hoo!!

Auntie Dee

Weasel wrote:

img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)

Unfortunately, this will probably never happen. H****r will agree to pay an enormous amount of child-support and be let off the hook! The Dem's cannot afford that trial!

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

thebigp wrote:

Democrats have shown great concern about even the possibility that there are connections between foreign powers and those in seats of power within our federal government. That “concern” has been demonstrated by Democrats going so far as to conduct a thus-far endless stream of investigations, probes, and inquiries that have hung like a shadow over every day of Donald Trump’s presidency. But that concern is pretend, rather than genuine. In this case, the estrangement between “Democrats” and “genuine” is illustrated by the simple fact that their alleged concern does not extend to one of their own, despite his clear connections to a foreign power.
In fact, rather than investigate the apparent shady dealings with Ukraine of former vice president and current p**********l hopeful Joe Biden and his son H****r, Democrats used the scandal to (once again) attempt to turn the tables and dump the whole thing squarely in the lap of President Trump. Blaming Trump for his appropriate response to Biden’s inappropriate actions, Democrats claim that the president’s actions are grounds for impeachment.
As we will demonstrate, all available evidence shows it was not the president’s response that crossed ethical and possibly legal lines. Instead it was actions of both Joe and H****r B***n that crossed those lines.
Once again, all of this seems more than a bit familiar. Like the Russia collusion narrative that Democrats created out of thin air to take the public eye off Hillary Clinton’s illegal e-mail system and evidence of her accepting bribes by foreign powers, the Ukraine corruption angle is just another example of Democrats manufacturing supposedly illegal behaviour.
While there certainly was collusion between Russia and someone in a seat of power within our federal government, it simply wasn’t Donald Trump or anyone associated with his candidacy — unless that association is expanded to include his opponent and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.
Considering the rank corruption and quid pro quo of the pay-for-play policies of Hillary Clinton’s State Department during her tenure as secretary of state, “collusion” is definitely an appropriate word to describe the Uranium One scandal. In that underhanded scheme, a Russian state-owned company acquired between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium reserves while the coffers of the Clinton Foundation were stuffed with $145 million in “donations” (read: bribes) from those involved on the Russian side of the deal.
Four years later, as it became apparent that Donald Trump could give Clinton a run for her money in the 2016 e******n, Democrats accused him of colluding with Russia, despite lacking any evidence to back up their claims.
This is the same gambit all over again. No investigation of those who were actually involved in wrongdoing, but an all-in approach to investigating Trump.
SOURCE- MITCHELL SHAW

Democrats have shown great concern about even the ... (show quote)

Ukraine was the highest in donations to the Clinton foundation, that's a fact. Does anybody want to hazard a guess why?

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

thebigp wrote:

Democrats have shown great concern about even the possibility that there are connections between foreign powers and those in seats of power within our federal government. That “concern” has been demonstrated by Democrats going so far as to conduct a thus-far endless stream of investigations, probes, and inquiries that have hung like a shadow over every day of Donald Trump’s presidency. But that concern is pretend, rather than genuine. In this case, the estrangement between “Democrats” and “genuine” is illustrated by the simple fact that their alleged concern does not extend to one of their own, despite his clear connections to a foreign power.
In fact, rather than investigate the apparent shady dealings with Ukraine of former vice president and current p**********l hopeful Joe Biden and his son H****r, Democrats used the scandal to (once again) attempt to turn the tables and dump the whole thing squarely in the lap of President Trump. Blaming Trump for his appropriate response to Biden’s inappropriate actions, Democrats claim that the president’s actions are grounds for impeachment.
As we will demonstrate, all available evidence shows it was not the president’s response that crossed ethical and possibly legal lines. Instead it was actions of both Joe and H****r B***n that crossed those lines.
Once again, all of this seems more than a bit familiar. Like the Russia collusion narrative that Democrats created out of thin air to take the public eye off Hillary Clinton’s illegal e-mail system and evidence of her accepting bribes by foreign powers, the Ukraine corruption angle is just another example of Democrats manufacturing supposedly illegal behaviour.
While there certainly was collusion between Russia and someone in a seat of power within our federal government, it simply wasn’t Donald Trump or anyone associated with his candidacy — unless that association is expanded to include his opponent and former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.
Considering the rank corruption and quid pro quo of the pay-for-play policies of Hillary Clinton’s State Department during her tenure as secretary of state, “collusion” is definitely an appropriate word to describe the Uranium One scandal. In that underhanded scheme, a Russian state-owned company acquired between 20 and 25 percent of U.S. uranium reserves while the coffers of the Clinton Foundation were stuffed with $145 million in “donations” (read: bribes) from those involved on the Russian side of the deal.
Four years later, as it became apparent that Donald Trump could give Clinton a run for her money in the 2016 e******n, Democrats accused him of colluding with Russia, despite lacking any evidence to back up their claims.
This is the same gambit all over again. No investigation of those who were actually involved in wrongdoing, but an all-in approach to investigating Trump.
SOURCE- MITCHELL SHAW

Democrats have shown great concern about even the ... (show quote)

Has anyone seen any coverage of Latvia trying to get assistance investigating international money laundering involving Burisma, H****r B***n, and H****r's consulting firm? I saw the story before Christmas, but it seems to have disappeared.