One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The middle finger now means you are...
Dec 26, 2019 16:34:54   #
ExperienceCounts
 
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 17:10:16   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not suppose... (show quote)


If a person is White and uses the "Okay" gesture to mean okay, as it has forever, they suddenly will be branded a r****t. This is how the left works. They have no objective standards and principles to live by., These useful i***ts (Whoops, I don't think I am allowed to use the word "i***t.". The last time, I called AF1 by such an accurate description the snowflake complained to admin and had me suspended for the past three days. I asked admin what word they consider a suitable replacement: Feebleminded, mental-defective, cretin, simpleton, halfwit, nitwit, numbskull, dope, nincompoop, dumbbell, dunce, boob, etc.? I did not receive an answer. That implies that any of these are suitable alternatives.) have only the dogmatic phony agenda of their handlers because they are too stupid (ul-oh, there is another trigger word) to think for themselves.

We pay good money, hard-earned, in taxes to buy them books and send them to school and they still don't learn how to think for themselves. They all suffer from group-think as fed to them by their elitist leaders.

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 17:14:02   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not suppose... (show quote)


Get it banned? That would take away half of my wife and I's language. We use sign language. One way is find a few 'social justice' warriors they are usually on Facebook and talk to them.

Reply
 
 
Dec 26, 2019 17:45:05   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not suppose... (show quote)


That’s the drivers finger!

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 19:30:38   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not suppose... (show quote)


F you!

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 19:57:02   #
Edulm1038
 
I don't think the middle finger has any particular meaning, rather, just meant to be a vulgar gesture.

Reply
Dec 26, 2019 20:38:48   #
plainlogic
 
ExperienceCounts wrote:
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not supposed to be taken seriously by the easily offended brain cell deficient clueless. <Smirk>
The hand gesture symbol "Ok" is now r****t according to the aforementioned persons.
What does that make the longest middle finger or digit standing in its lonesome glory projected towards someone?
Traditionally, it means, "Fxxk you," a term of derision, disrespect, or you are a moron."
Seriously, how can I get this hand gesture banned?
I can start the rumor that it is a bias, sexist, h********c gesture. Hum, if a man does it to another man, he is soliciting sex. If a woman does it to a woman, she is soliciting sex. If a man does it to a woman, or a woman does it to a man, then they are implying that the other person is <Gasp> swinging the other way or taking medical treatments to t***sition through a physical s*x c****e, thus it is still a h********c gesture. Then again, they may be making an unlawful request.
What do you think? Can the new meaning catch on?
<Smirk> Just so you know this is not suppose... (show quote)


The liberals already use it for those purposes. LOL

Reply
 
 
Dec 27, 2019 05:25:27   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
plainlogic wrote:
The liberals already use it for those purposes. LOL


I thought they were advertising their number of known parents.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.