Republicans Head Into E******n Year with Seven Times as Much Cash as Democrats, FEC Filings Show
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/21/republicans-democrats-cash-hand/
This is what they call pay to play, the republicans are bought and paid for.
Kevyn wrote:
This is what they call pay to play, the republicans are bought and paid for.
When Hillary was Sec of State, you were loving the pay to play from every State sponsored terrorist country known to mankind. When she was "peddling influence", you were fine with it. Give me a break. Hillary was the poster child for the corrupt pay-to-play fiasco. "the Queen"!!!!! BTW, it all dried up when she lost!
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/21/republicans-democrats-cash-hand/
... and 600,000
new donors ... since the dems started impeachment proceedings against President Trump .... that is, 600,000
so far. Can't wait to see how many more new donors pitch in once the House dems are fully exposed by the Senate ... and after the D****m r****t comes out with the "rest of the story" on the deep state intelligence agents' attempted c**p on President Trump ... with their falsified information presented to the FISA court and the strategic leaks that led to the Mueller investigation.
CarryOn wrote:
... and 600,000 new donors ... since the dems started impeachment proceedings against President Trump .... that is, 600,000 so far. Can't wait to see how many more new donors pitch in once the House dems are fully exposed by the Senate ... and after the D****m r****t comes out with the "rest of the story" on the deep state intelligence agents' attempted c**p on President Trump ... with their falsified information presented to the FISA court and the strategic leaks that led to the Mueller investigation.
... and 600,000 b new /b donors ... since the de... (
show quote)
Nancy must have thought this whole process was going to help her cause....and instead it BACKFIRED. I feel so sorry for her.
fullspinzoo wrote:
I feel so sorry for her.
..... I assume that was sarcasm??
I'm not sure what she was thinking or what her plan is now. She seems to still be trying to find a way to turn this circus into some kind of legitimate act. But all she is doing is making it worse. I don't think many people are buying her "solemn, prayerful, dark day" crap.
And she continues to contradict herself without answering the obvious questions as to her own list of "requirements for impeachment" that she pointed out just a few short weeks ago.
And then she let it slip that they had been working on impeachment for 22 months.
And then she rushes through the process and calls a v**e before the holiday recess because there is an "urgency" and our country and our Constitution are at stake so we must stop this man immediately ... then she turns around and stalls the whole thing until January, which makes no sense at all ...
And then she invites President Trump to speak at the SOTU in February.
She may be trying to please too many people in her party with opposing views .... then again she may just be schizo ...
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/21/republicans-democrats-cash-hand/
It's a shame when money makes a difference.
woodguru wrote:
It's a shame when money makes a difference.
It's a shame "when we have seven times more" is what you are really saying.
fullspinzoo wrote:
It's a shame "when we have seven times more" is what you are really saying.
Exactly, fullspin! If it were the other way around, I have no doubt they would shove it in our faces. Individual Congressmen p***e themselves on being the "biggest fundraiser" ... pelosi being one of the biggest and quite proud of it, which is in large part why she wields so much power in the House.
Money matters when it comes to campaigns, and no one for a second believes that both parties don't know that. IIRC, bo left DC early the morning after the disastrous attack and murders of Ambassador Stevens and others in B******i ... for what? A fundraiser. I believe it was in Vegas. Heaven forbid he should miss an opportunity to hobnob with a bunch of wealthy donors for campaign cash .. simply because of something like that. If that doesn't scream "Money matters" then nothing does ...
And why do the dem primary candidates' appearance in debates depend on the amount of money they receive in donations? Because, again, money matters ... AND because it is an indication of donors' interest and belief in the candidate ...
The differential in amounts is what the dems are upset about ... especially when new donors are adding to the pot .... it says something they don't want to hear ...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.