One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Drawing a reprimand from the OPP Adminstration
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 22, 2019 08:30:22   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 08:39:15   #
wilpharm
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)


this is the same admin that administers UHH forums...most conservatives have been spanked by the liberal
admin..

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 08:40:41   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)


Don't let it bother you to much.
I have been there for 6 months of banishment this year myself for using the exact same word
Just play smarter and you will find it Really Pi $$es them off.
Check out my profile. and have a nice day.

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2019 08:43:12   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)



The administration operates this forum with the bias that Schiff does his inquiry.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 08:48:04   #
factnotfiction
 
If you cons could read, comprehend a d understand what Admin rules are, then you cons would not get the nastygrams and need to be rehabilitated from time to time.

Just because trump constantly name call, makes personal attacks and issue insults, the facts are you cons cannot do it. So learn your lessons and take your dunce hats off.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 08:54:58   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
factnotfiction wrote:
If you cons could read, comprehend a d understand what Admin rules are, then you cons would not get the nastygrams and need to be rehabilitated from time to time.

Just because trump constantly name call, makes personal attacks and issue insults, the facts are you cons cannot do it. So learn your lessons and take your dunce hats off.


Now I think you would have to agree that the picture posted yesterday of Perm. Was the most DISCUSTING and VILE thing immiganable. But no reprimand whatsoever.
Had that been a Muslim though ????????.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 09:03:15   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
factnotfiction wrote:
If you cons could read, comprehend a d understand what Admin rules are, then you cons would not get the nastygrams and need to be rehabilitated from time to time.

Just because trump constantly name call, makes personal attacks and issue insults, the facts are you cons cannot do it. So learn your lessons and take your dunce hats off.


Wrong, factnotfiction. You are a major factor in the dispensation of hysteria. You have NEVER in my experience stuck to facts. If you did, any conservativew would destroy your arguments and those of your cohorts.

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2019 09:04:55   #
factnotfiction
 
Weasel wrote:
Now I think you would have to agree that the picture posted yesterday of Perm. Was the most DISCUSTING and VILE thing immiganable. But no reprimand whatsoever.
Had that been a Muslim though ????????.





The actual photo of a fetus posted by an evangelical nutjob was far more d********g than a political cartoon.


But the fact remains, cons think the rules do not apply to them

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 09:06:06   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
factnotfiction wrote:
If you cons could read, comprehend a d understand what Admin rules are, then you cons would not get the nastygrams and need to be rehabilitated from time to time.

Just because trump constantly name call, makes personal attacks and issue insults, the facts are you cons cannot do it. So learn your lessons and take your dunce hats off.



Hypocrite post!!!!

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 09:32:43   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)


WOW!!!! But they ALLOWED a poster to call me a B*t*H No, they spelled it out no asterisks. Interesting.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 09:35:19   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
factnotfiction wrote:
The actual photo of a fetus posted by an evangelical nutjob was far more d********g than a political cartoon.


But the fact remains, cons think the rules do not apply to them


A relative, perhaps?

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2019 09:56:48   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)
I have been reprimanded so many times it is not funny No body is immune

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 10:08:49   #
Kevyn
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
The following concerns a reprimand I received from the OPP administration. The two items that would be of concern to the administration, I think, would be calling Robert Mueller a scumball or the reference to PeterS' IQ.

However Kevyn, regularly calls Donald J, Trump and other Republicans and conservatives scumbags and PeterS always calls us names.

With this as background, I would cherish being banned from OPP.




Admin:
Your post inside topic "Is this political bias in the FBI?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult, repeated warnings/deletions will lead to account suspension

Deleted post:
crazylibertarian wrote:
PeterS wrote:
It's one thing to be biased and it's another thing to let that bias influence your work. I'm assuming that conservatives bias influences their work so they believe that everyone else is the same as they are. Well, that's not the case and that's what the IG acknowledged...


CL's comment:
And the IG's report cited 17 errors of omission and fabrication under scumball Mueller. 17! Not one or two which could be considered accidental. 17. You should be able to count that high in spite of it being about 7 points above your IQ.

Once more you demonstrate what you are, a blathering i***t.
The following concerns a reprimand I received from... (show quote)

The difference is obvious so pay attention, you directed a personal insult at a member of the forum which is clearly not allowed if you direct a similar insult at a politician or celebrity it doesn't violate the guidelines. I am not sure but I think that in many instances someone has to complain about a posting before it is removed. There is the paranoid view amongst some of the right Wing nutters here that they are being singled out by the administration, I can assure you that is not true, I have had numerous posts delegated and my account suspended twice. This has not happened in a while because I read and follow the guidelines.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 10:13:53   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Kevyn wrote:
The difference is obvious so pay attention, you directed a personal insult at a member of the forum which is clearly not allowed if you direct a similar insult at a politician or celebrity it doesn't violate the guidelines. I am not sure but I think that in many instances someone has to complain about a posting before it is removed. There is the paranoid view amongst some of the right Wing nutters here that they are being singled out by the administration, I can assure you that is not true, I have had numerous posts delegated and my account suspended twice. This has not happened in a while because I read and follow the guidelines.
The difference is obvious so pay attention, you di... (show quote)



You insulted my mother, for that, you weren't even warned.

So you are a hypothetical liar.

Reply
Dec 22, 2019 10:29:41   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
Kevyn wrote:
The difference is obvious so pay attention, you directed a personal insult at a member of the forum which is clearly not allowed if you direct a similar insult at a politician or celebrity it doesn't violate the guidelines. I am not sure but I think that in many instances someone has to complain about a posting before it is removed. There is the paranoid view amongst some of the right Wing nutters here that they are being singled out by the administration, I can assure you that is not true, I have had numerous posts delegated and my account suspended twice. This has not happened in a while because I read and follow the guidelines.
The difference is obvious so pay attention, you di... (show quote)


Delegated where?

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.