America does not need to see billionaire tax returns....
"America does not need to see the tax return of a billionaire who became a public servant.
America needs to see the tax returns of public servants who became millionaires while being public servants."
padremike wrote:
"America does not need to see the tax return of a billionaire who became a public servant.
America needs to see the tax returns of public servants who became millionaires while being public servants."
Wouldn't that result in a lack of public servants?
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Brilliant, Mike.
Thanks but this "brilliance" is not of my own making. I thought it poignant enough to pass on to "those who have ears.". 😇
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Wouldn't that result in a lack of public servants?
Isn't that food for thought?
padremike wrote:
Isn't that food for thought?
The trials would be most enjoyable...
爽 (pronounced Shu wang) is the Chinese term for a feeling of great satisfaction stemming from the victory over one's opponents or enemies....
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Wouldn't that result in a lack of public servants?
===========================================================
So what in the hell do we think NOW ?
The f**e billionaire needs to show his sources of graft and corruption.
moldyoldy wrote:
The f**e billionaire needs to show his sources of graft and corruption.
Sometimes these brainless statements drive me to the brink of swearing.
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Sometimes these brainless statements drive me to the brink of swearing.
Brainless is following a f**e billionaire who claims he got a million dollar loan from his father, when actually he inherited over 640 million plus a real estate business. He has struggled to keep it .
moldyoldy wrote:
Brainless is following a f**e billionaire who claims he got a million dollar loan from his father, when actually he inherited over 640 million plus a real estate business. He has struggled to keep it .
Are you talking about Steyer or Bloomberg?
Now there is what I'd like to see happen. Pin that to the wall and throw darts at just how these public servant's amassed so much from there terms in office. There is something so very wrong there. I see that as doing personal business while on the time of the public's payroll which is a twenty four /seven job for the public, not personal gain !! Take Palosi's bank roll for instance. It's said that she is worth over 100 million but if so why is it that at $172,000.00 per year for the last thirty years only comes to $5,160,000.00 over trirty years. That's almost $95,000,000.00 more than thirty years as a public servant would make if they were doing the job as a public servant . This raise's the question. HOW the heck did she make that much money while being a public servant. Just what side line does she have going on to earn all that extra money while supposedly working for the public ?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.