I Can Understand Cleaning Up V**er Rolls, But Done Across The Board, Not By Targeting Districts: Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fine, but how are they doing it? And...

woodguru

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fine, but how are they doing it? And keep in mind that the race for the governor was lost by only 40,000 v**es.

So okay, we are purging 300,000 v**ers, what is the criteria and methodology used, is it targeting one group and is it done across the state, or in selected regions?

So let's say dems control the state and all of the e******n boards and the process. They know that rural lightly populated areas are heavily conservative, they as a demographic may be older. So you send out a postcard that requires a return in order to validate their v***r r**********n status. I know a lot of people that don't even look at things like this, considering it junk mail. Send out a few million of these, the likely result will be a purge of hundreds of thousands of people not responding, skewed heavily toward republicans. Now take it a step further, and really tip the scales, how about making intentional errors that result in the card being returned to sender? This has been done, it is a thing that results in tens of thousands of people being taken off the registration rolls. It makes people go through the process all over who may not have the time considering another trick is to limit access to new registrations. Every state should have the same exact v***r r**********n and e******n laws.

So no harm no foul you say? A valid v**er shows up to v**e, has the proper ID, but is told they are not on the list, they have to do a provisional b****t. This thing is going to be subjected to some very creative reasons to not count it, if the provisionals are even counted at all for one reason or another.

Georgia is purging 300,000 v**ers from two of the heaviest populations in the state, and it is no accident that these are areas that heavily favor democrats. The supreme court, in gutting the v**er rights act, has made it to where red states can get away with tipping the scales by eliminating disproportionate numbers of democrats, you know, because otherwise it isn't fair because there are less republicans in the state.

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

woodguru wrote:

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fine, but how are they doing it? And keep in mind that the race for the governor was lost by only 40,000 v**es.

So okay, we are purging 300,000 v**ers, what is the criteria and methodology used, is it targeting one group and is it done across the state, or in selected regions?

So let's say dems control the state and all of the e******n boards and the process. They know that rural lightly populated areas are heavily conservative, they as a demographic may be older. So you send out a postcard that requires a return in order to validate their v***r r**********n status. I know a lot of people that don't even look at things like this, considering it junk mail. Send out a few million of these, the likely result will be a purge of hundreds of thousands of people not responding, skewed heavily toward republicans. Now take it a step further, and really tip the scales, how about making intentional errors that result in the card being returned to sender? This has been done, it is a thing that results in tens of thousands of people being taken off the registration rolls. It makes people go through the process all over who may not have the time considering another trick is to limit access to new registrations. Every state should have the same exact v***r r**********n and e******n laws.

So no harm no foul you say? A valid v**er shows up to v**e, has the proper ID, but is told they are not on the list, they have to do a provisional b****t. This thing is going to be subjected to some very creative reasons to not count it, if the provisionals are even counted at all for one reason or another.

Georgia is purging 300,000 v**ers from two of the heaviest populations in the state, and it is no accident that these are areas that heavily favor democrats. The supreme court, in gutting the v**er rights act, has made it to where red states can get away with tipping the scales by eliminating disproportionate numbers of democrats, you know, because otherwise it isn't fair because there are less republicans in the state.

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fi... (show quote)

You dont live in Georgia, get over it.

karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!

woodguru wrote:

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fine, but how are they doing it? And keep in mind that the race for the governor was lost by only 40,000 v**es.

So okay, we are purging 300,000 v**ers, what is the criteria and methodology used, is it targeting one group and is it done across the state, or in selected regions?

So let's say dems control the state and all of the e******n boards and the process. They know that rural lightly populated areas are heavily conservative, they as a demographic may be older. So you send out a postcard that requires a return in order to validate their v***r r**********n status. I know a lot of people that don't even look at things like this, considering it junk mail. Send out a few million of these, the likely result will be a purge of hundreds of thousands of people not responding, skewed heavily toward republicans. Now take it a step further, and really tip the scales, how about making intentional errors that result in the card being returned to sender? This has been done, it is a thing that results in tens of thousands of people being taken off the registration rolls. It makes people go through the process all over who may not have the time considering another trick is to limit access to new registrations. Every state should have the same exact v***r r**********n and e******n laws.

So no harm no foul you say? A valid v**er shows up to v**e, has the proper ID, but is told they are not on the list, they have to do a provisional b****t. This thing is going to be subjected to some very creative reasons to not count it, if the provisionals are even counted at all for one reason or another.

Georgia is purging 300,000 v**ers from two of the heaviest populations in the state, and it is no accident that these are areas that heavily favor democrats. The supreme court, in gutting the v**er rights act, has made it to where red states can get away with tipping the scales by eliminating disproportionate numbers of democrats, you know, because otherwise it isn't fair because there are less republicans in the state.

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fi... (show quote)

Do You Have A Verifiable Source For This Story

Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas

karpenter wrote:

Do You Have A Verifiable Source For This Story

Never has, never will either...... all hoping and wishing.

American Vet

woodguru wrote:

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fine, but how are they doing it? And keep in mind that the race for the governor was lost by only 40,000 v**es.

So okay, we are purging 300,000 v**ers, what is the criteria and methodology used, is it targeting one group and is it done across the state, or in selected regions?

So let's say dems control the state and all of the e******n boards and the process. They know that rural lightly populated areas are heavily conservative, they as a demographic may be older. So you send out a postcard that requires a return in order to validate their v***r r**********n status. I know a lot of people that don't even look at things like this, considering it junk mail. Send out a few million of these, the likely result will be a purge of hundreds of thousands of people not responding, skewed heavily toward republicans. Now take it a step further, and really tip the scales, how about making intentional errors that result in the card being returned to sender? This has been done, it is a thing that results in tens of thousands of people being taken off the registration rolls. It makes people go through the process all over who may not have the time considering another trick is to limit access to new registrations. Every state should have the same exact v***r r**********n and e******n laws.

So no harm no foul you say? A valid v**er shows up to v**e, has the proper ID, but is told they are not on the list, they have to do a provisional b****t. This thing is going to be subjected to some very creative reasons to not count it, if the provisionals are even counted at all for one reason or another.

Georgia is purging 300,000 v**ers from two of the heaviest populations in the state, and it is no accident that these are areas that heavily favor democrats. The supreme court, in gutting the v**er rights act, has made it to where red states can get away with tipping the scales by eliminating disproportionate numbers of democrats, you know, because otherwise it isn't fair because there are less republicans in the state.

Georgia is purging almost 300,000 v**ers...okay fi... (show quote)

So aren't the v**ers smart enough to check on their status?

steve66613

American Vet wrote:

So aren't the v**ers smart enough to check on their status?

Smart v**ers in Georgia? Puh...lease!

(That’s a lil’ joke.)