They're all asking the wrong question! The question is not what H****r can do for Burisma with his utter lack of qualifications, its what is Joe doing for Burisma or Ukraine or both...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

The question is not what H****r can do for Burisma with his utter lack of qualifications, its what is Joe doing for Burisma or Ukraine or both such that they would "pay" H****r so much and launder even more money to him??

http://www.politifact.com/t***h-o-meter/article/2019/dec/16/silence-year-what-did-h****r-biden-do-burisma/

http://pjmedia.com/trending/latvia-f**gged-burisma-payments-to-h****r-biden-in-2016-suspecting-money-laundering/

Pelosi, now stalling, is simply providing more time for this to come out. McConnell isn't going to give in to her "favor" to be able to dictate the trial in the Senate, I guess the Senate can't move forward with out the "official" delivery of the Articles of Impeachment, so here we will sit. Along the same line, if the Articles of Impeachment aren't delivered, is Trump really Impeached???

Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!

nwtk2007 wrote:

The question is not what H****r can do for Burisma... (show quote)

I shutter to think what Joe Biden will do for Burisma if (And That Is A Big IF) HE
becomes the next POTUS.

His son H****r, making $86,000,00.
PER MONTH, and doesn't even know the difference between a Kumquat and a Kilowatt.

debeda

nwtk2007 wrote:

The question is not what H****r can do for Burisma... (show quote)

This is all so dumb. The dems have devolved into the do nothing party of high drama and BS. I read that the NJ dem who switched parties to R said part of the reason he did it was because he was threatened by the D party leadership that "they'd ruin him" if he didn't fall in line for impeachment.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

debeda wrote:

This is all so dumb. The dems have devolved into the do nothing party of high drama and BS. I read that the NJ dem who switched parties to R said part of the reason he did it was because he was threatened by the D party leadership that "they'd ruin him" if he didn't fall in line for impeachment.

Of course they did. Al those i***ts on CNN believing the prayerful Nancy and her BS.

debeda

JFlorio wrote:

Of course they did. Al those i***ts on CNN believing the prayerful Nancy and her BS.

Nancy, Maxine, diane, Schiff, nadler, all going visibly senile. They should step aside. And the new guard, aka the "Squad" it just bats**tt crazy right out of the box

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

debeda wrote:

This is all so dumb. The dems have devolved into the do nothing party of high drama and BS. I read that the NJ dem who switched parties to R said part of the reason he did it was because he was threatened by the D party leadership that "they'd ruin him" if he didn't fall in line for impeachment.

I have no doubt. Nancy is an evil woman!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

debeda wrote:

Nancy, Maxine, diane, Schiff, nadler, all going visibly senile. They should step aside. And the new guard, aka the "Squad" it just bats**tt crazy right out of the box

Exactly. The squad will make more sense when actual dementia kicks in.

debeda

nwtk2007 wrote:

I have no doubt. Nancy is an evil woman!

debeda

JFlorio wrote:

Exactly. The squad will make more sense when actual dementia kicks in.

Lolololhahahaha maybe

Carol Kelly

nwtk2007 wrote:

The question is not what H****r can do for Burisma... (show quote)

No. Until the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate, there is NO impeachment. There never was , was there. No crime!

Carol Kelly

JFlorio wrote:

Exactly. The squad will make more sense when actual dementia kicks in.

debeda

Carol Kelly wrote:

No. Until the articles of impeachment are delivered to the Senate, there is NO impeachment. There never was , was there. No crime!

Maybe Mitch should charge Nancy with obstruction of Congress

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

Pelosilini is a puppet and her orders from headquarters are to acquire Muellers grand jury testimony
and wait for what Durham comes up with so as to continue with their fishing expedition

This is the 'hail mary strategy' to attempt to cover up over 3 decades of demonrat criminal activity.
They'll even try to take it to the SCOTUS if they think in their warped minds they perceive an opening.
And Yes, All of these actions are unconstitutional and is simply obstruction

Carol Kelly

debeda wrote:

Maybe Mitch should charge Nancy with obstruction o... (show quote)

Yes!

Carol Kelly

Crayons wrote:

Pelosilini is a puppet and her orders from headquarters are to acquire Muellers grand jury testimony
and wait for what Durham comes up with so as to continue with their fishing expedition

This is the 'hail mary strategy' to attempt to cover up over 3 decades of demonrat criminal activity.
They'll even try to take it to the SCOTUS if they think in their warped minds they perceive an opening.
And Yes, All of these actions are unconstitutional and is simply obstruction

Amen