One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Answer This Question
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 17, 2019 17:12:07   #
Liberty Tree
 
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 17:29:51   #
moldyoldy
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?


Just to remove any doubt from you

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 17:44:11   #
Liberty Tree
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Just to remove any doubt from you


Because Democrats know the public is catching on to this farce and they need another fishing expedition.

Reply
 
 
Dec 17, 2019 18:08:43   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
They're still searching for a crime, a misdemeanor, even.


Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:13:03   #
son of witless
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Just to remove any doubt from you


It won't work.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:34:56   #
Mikeyavelli
 
The kommiecrats worked backwards on the constitution for impeachment.
They took the three reasons given for impeachment and made up Trump's violations for each of them.
They are trying for a c**p that appears to be legal. If that doesn't work, they'll try it the Clinton way.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:39:05   #
Hug
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The kommiecrats worked backwards on the constitution for impeachment.
They took the three reasons given for impeachment and made up Trump's violations for each of them.
They are trying for a c**p that appears to be legal. If that doesn't work, they'll try it the Clinton way.


That is what I am afraid of.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:40:43   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
Upside down and backwards.

Every offense they attempt to nail to him, they have already openly committed, with the full acquiescence of the media, and, thus, very little fanfare.



Mikeyavelli wrote:
The kommiecrats worked backwards on the constitution for impeachment.
They took the three reasons given for impeachment and made up Trump's violations for each of them.
They are trying for a c**p that appears to be legal. If that doesn't work, they'll try it the Clinton way.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:44:29   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?




The ones They have will not survive cross examination. ....probably never make it through discovery phase, phone records, bank records, flight records. ..etc, etc, etc...........and they know it.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:45:13   #
CarryOn
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?


This is Part 2 of the latest plan. They know they don't have enough proof, and I think they also know that those witnesses are not going to provide that proof even if they are forced to testify. So to try to save face, the next step is to scream "Cover up."

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:45:51   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Zemirah wrote:
Upside down and backwards.

Every offense they attempt to nail to him, they have already openly committed, with the full acquiescence of the media, and, thus, very little fanfare.


With full cooperation with the media, the international left, and most of Washington DC, including most Republicans, who are just as eager to remove Trump from office as are the kommiecrats.
I'm not sure that a Senate v**e will acquit Trump.
If the Republicans were against this c**p, it would have been stopped years ago.
I don't trust anyone in Washington DC.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:50:57   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Just to remove any doubt from you




Wasting your time, what you have shown already is a partisan joke, why would parading more i***tic Shiff droppings in front of America help your cause? News flash........it will not!!!

I swear, liberals have to be blind to their own insanity.........to quadruple down on stupidity is beyond measure.

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 18:54:45   #
jeff smith
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?


to be able to develop another fishing expedition . they are still looking for a crime . no crime in sight so lets create a scenario to be able to look into other matters . the lying two faced back stabbing bimbocrats are just wasting tax dollars . aren't they such a bunch of high dollar spenders when it comes to our tax dollars ? when it all could of been used for something worth while .

Reply
Dec 17, 2019 19:12:50   #
Armageddun Loc: The show me state
 
Zemirah wrote:
They're still searching for a crime, a misdemeanor, even.



Reply
Dec 17, 2019 19:36:32   #
Radiance3
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the democrats have built as strong a case as they say they have against Trump why do they need more witnesses in the Senate?

===============
More witness for what? The purpose is to endlessly harass the president as they've promised even after he wins the 2020 e******n

They did not allow witnesses for the president during their secret inquiry at the basement in Congress. They did manufacture and invent cases against the president without credibility.
The document to enforce are : The original transcript of the president's phone call and the verbal testimony of Ukraine president Zelensky. Those are the two that must be acceptable in Court. No heresies, no gossips, no 3rd party rumors which all they have.

Even the whistle blower could not be questioned, but hidden personality. The court does not accept that. Both parties must be questioned, and present their case for review of the Court.

This is a gross violation of the president's constitutional rights. Why does the dumb GOP Senate could not stop this? I'd dismiss the whole case and return to Adam Schiff. Not enforceable, no crime committed, crime does not exist. A waste of time and money of the taxpayers.

They termed the crime of abuse of power and obstruction of justice to "high crime and misdemeanor to qualify for impeachment.

The abuse of power did not exist. I explained this over and over already. The president did his duties to verification and investigation of Ukraine before a final fund is released. These are essential procedures and must be enforced before any t***saction is approved. He did the right job, and be commended for that.

It so happened that there was a history of corruption of the Biden father and with his son concerning the Burizma Holding Co. This was the hidden crime of the prior Obama administration and they wanted it hidden but came out during this investigation. Of course, the president must ask question about this 2016 activities.

The other one was obstruction of justice. Adam Schiff demanded that president appear to the Congressional inquiry to testify and defend his case. There was nothing to defend because he did not do anything wrong. In addition, as Chief Executive, he has his rights and privileges not to answer to the demands of Congress. Congress must require a court order to enforce the president to doing this. But they did not. They think that they are the most powerful. Which is now a blatant abuse of power by Congress and president Trump has the right to deny them. He is the Chief Executive and Schiff does not have any compulsion against the president.

There are no cases for impeachment. These are all blatant violations of the president's constitutional rights. Schiff and Pelosi must be held accountable for their abuses against the president.

The inept Senate must dismiss the case. There are no crimes violated. The president followed all protocols and must be commended, and exonerated for this.

The president must sue Adam Schiff and Pelosi for all the sufferings and barriers placed on front of him while doing his jobs. The president must sue Adam Schiff and Pelosi for the crimes against the American people, and Adam Schiff must be dismissed or be removed or impeached from Congress.

Pelosi's demise, she is an old woman rid of her by 2020 and allow her to get old and wrinkled without botox.

I wish I could stand there at the podium in Congress to prove that this that there was no crime committed, but tyrannical take over against the president and must be stopped. They are all wrong, and an abuse of power. I am certain of this.

Reply
Page 1 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.