proud republican wrote:
Like I said before you have a fetish for dirty ... (
show quote)
Noooo your the diaper lady of OPP where’s your diaper supporter Archie he’s as d********g as you are with your Trump BS. You love a guy that abuses women you have to be really classy
bggamers wrote:
He didn't the copy of the phone call said it and so did the people listening
What did you hear anything about corruption did you listen to 8 career officials testify under oath did you hear two ambassadors that Trump appointed testify under oath, that freak is guilty as hell.
It’s amazing how these Trump supporters cannot answer a simple question where is Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani and Pompeo they can raise there right hand and testify in Trumps defense. Or maybe there afraid of ending up in jail or headed to jail like Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Cohen these guys testified and ended up in Jail.
[quote=Airforceone]Oh yes I
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Weasel
Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
Airforceone wrote:
Why can’t you Trump people answer a simple question that White House freak told you i***ts everything he did was perfect.
But he offered no under oath testimony. It’s amazing you people have to lack any common sense. He said he was perfect then go and raise your right hand and testify. Ahhh he doesn’t have to he has an i***t r****t base that loves kids being k**led in classrooms
BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE TO ● Period
Airforceone wrote:
What did you hear anything about corruption did you listen to 8 career officials testify under oath did you hear two ambassadors that
Trump appointed testify under oath, that freak is guilty as hell.
8 Career Bureaucrats State Openly
Under Oath
They Were NOT Material Witnesses
teabag09 wrote:
Think about what you are asking and you will have the answer.
So far, who would he have answered, under oath, to?
You should think before you let your fingers do the walking, it might make you look less stupid. Mike
LOL. You saved your comments with the last sentence. I was gonna ask you if you knew who you were talking to. Besides, in 2018 a court found Ukrainians complicit in interfering in the 2016 p**********l e******n for the benefit of the Clinton campaign.
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201812141070671076-Ukraine-Court-Reveals-Interfered-E******n-Manafort/
Airforceone wrote:
How come Trump has not offered any under oath testimony in defense of his Russian propaganda that it was the Ukraine that hacked our e******ns not the Russians.
In your case ignorance is truly bliss.
Airforceone wrote:
Why can’t you Trump people answer a simple question that White House freak told you i***ts everything he did was perfect.
But he offered no under oath testimony. It’s amazing you people have to lack any common sense. He said he was perfect then go and raise your right hand and testify. Ahhh he doesn’t have to he has an i***t r****t base that loves kids being k**led in classrooms
Let me try:
#1. Pres. Trump does not need to testify, to anybody, under oath or not, regarding the “phone call”......it’s a matter of public record...you can read it along with everyone else in the universe. If you can’t read it, have someone read it to you. If you cannot comprehend it, that’s your problem.
#2. The Republicans are not the party synonymous with “child murder”. You, your ilk and the Democrat party, are complicit, in said murders, in hospitals and clinics all across this country.....in excess of 600,000 per year!
#3. Do not refer to people, who favor Pres. Trump as “i***ts”. We are DEPLORABLE, SMELLY WALMART SHOPPERS. Damn proud of it too! You go back to your elitist, g*******t, socialist, c*******t, and h**e-spewing cabal’s hiding hole.
Airforceone wrote:
No I have personal hygiene your just plain d********g.
AirForce can I ask you a serious question without you responding in a nasty manner? Why do you feel it’s necessary to be so insulting to people that disagree with you? Can’t you just agree to disagree in a civilized manner instead of starting the conversation by insulting everyone who is on the opposite side politically?
We are all Americans and we all want the same things, peace and prosperity for all. We just disagree how to get there.
A little civility goes a long way, you might give it a shot. This nasty stuff is taking the fun out of participating in this forum. Can’t we all play in the same sandbox?
cbpat1 wrote:
AirForce can I ask you a serious question without you responding in a nasty manner? Why do you feel it’s necessary to be so insulting to people that disagree with you? Can’t you just agree to disagree in a civilized manner instead of starting the conversation by insulting everyone who is on the opposite side politically?
We are all Americans and we all want the same things, peace and prosperity for all. We just disagree how to get there.
A little civility goes a long way, you might give it a shot. This nasty stuff is taking the fun out of participating in this forum. Can’t we all play in the same sandbox?
AirForce can I ask you a serious question without ... (
show quote)
He’s not capable of being nice, it’s not in his DNA.
Louis wrote:
He’s not capable of being nice, it’s not in his DNA.
Everyone is capable if they want to be.
Airforceone wrote:
It’s a simple GD question how come he has not allowed anybody to testify under oath if he did everything perfect why is he blocking and obstructing everything.
First of all, He doesn't have to allow his Staff and Cabinet to testify - executive privilege. Off to SCOTUS as is appropriate for a ruling. Second, the hysterical Progressive House of Representatives is not of greater authority than the Presidency; they need a refresher course. Next, when Bat Schiff would not allow the GOP to call their own witnesses or even question the whistleblower, when he frequently interrupted and stopped Conservatives and would not allow their own hand picked witnesses to answer, it was evident the House Progressives had become a lynch mob. Why should Trump, his staff and Cabinet, subject themselves to the lies and disrespect they would have intentionally been put through? We're going to witness something entirely different in the Senate and If you do not believe the progressives are scared, ask yourself the real reason why Chuck Schumer believes he should run and control the Senate impeachment trial.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.