Report calls Yovanovitch’s impeachment testimony into question due to inconsistencies
Report calls Yovanovitch’s impeachment testimony into question due to inconsistencies
December 15, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Looking over the tapes from the early days of the Donald Trump impeachment hearings has brought a doozy of a problem for Democrats and a key witness they used to build the impeachment case.
According to a report from Townhall, it appears that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch lied under oath about her contacts with the Obama administration — in particular, Joe and H****r B***n.
The Lie
During the public impeachment hearings in the House Intelligence Committee in November, every witness was given the opportunity to give an opening statement.
During Yovanovitch’s opening, she stated: “Although I have met former Vice President Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or H****r B***n with me.”
But as the witnesses were being questioned by members of Congress, Yovanovitch offered a different version of that story.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), questioned Yovanovitch: “The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers.”
Stefanik went on: “This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q&A with the Obama State Department, it wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about H****r B***n and Burisma. Is that correct?”
The former ambassador confirmed: “Yes. It is.” So Yovanovitch either lied during her opening testimony or she lied in giving that answer. Regardless, this testimony leaves a gaping hole in the impeachment case.
The Deep State
Assuming Yovanovitch lied during her opening testimony, it makes it quite clear she was trying to mislead everyone listening as to just how much the administration was aware of the Biden problem.
Remember, Joe Biden has maintained that although he knew H****r was placed on the board of Burisma, he didn’t “know what he [H****r] was doing,” according to the Daily Caller.
The current excuse is that the vice president was too tied up in his son Beau’s health problems to worry about H****r’s business dealings. If, however, Yovanovitch was being briefed on H****r B***n, the administration, including Joe Biden, clearly knew about the problem.
First and foremost, Yovanovitch needs to be held accountable for lying. Secondly, there must be an investigation as to just what the administration was doing to cover all this up and the motivation behind these measures.
no propaganda please wrote:
Report calls Yovanovitch’s impeachment testimony into question due to inconsistencies
December 15, 2019 by Jerry McCormick
Looking over the tapes from the early days of the Donald Trump impeachment hearings has brought a doozy of a problem for Democrats and a key witness they used to build the impeachment case.
According to a report from Townhall, it appears that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch lied under oath about her contacts with the Obama administration — in particular, Joe and H****r B***n.
The Lie
During the public impeachment hearings in the House Intelligence Committee in November, every witness was given the opportunity to give an opening statement.
During Yovanovitch’s opening, she stated: “Although I have met former Vice President Joe Biden several times over the course of our many years in government service, neither he nor the previous administration ever raised the issue of either Burisma or H****r B***n with me.”
But as the witnesses were being questioned by members of Congress, Yovanovitch offered a different version of that story.
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), questioned Yovanovitch: “The first time you personally became aware of Burisma was actually when you were being prepared by the Obama State Department for your Senate confirmation hearings, and this was in the form of practice questions and answers.”
Stefanik went on: “This was your deposition. And you testified in this particular practice Q&A with the Obama State Department, it wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about H****r B***n and Burisma. Is that correct?”
The former ambassador confirmed: “Yes. It is.” So Yovanovitch either lied during her opening testimony or she lied in giving that answer. Regardless, this testimony leaves a gaping hole in the impeachment case.
The Deep State
Assuming Yovanovitch lied during her opening testimony, it makes it quite clear she was trying to mislead everyone listening as to just how much the administration was aware of the Biden problem.
Remember, Joe Biden has maintained that although he knew H****r was placed on the board of Burisma, he didn’t “know what he [H****r] was doing,” according to the Daily Caller.
The current excuse is that the vice president was too tied up in his son Beau’s health problems to worry about H****r’s business dealings. If, however, Yovanovitch was being briefed on H****r B***n, the administration, including Joe Biden, clearly knew about the problem.
First and foremost, Yovanovitch needs to be held accountable for lying. Secondly, there must be an investigation as to just what the administration was doing to cover all this up and the motivation behind these measures.
Report calls Yovanovitch’s impeachment testimony i... (
show quote)
Ukraine also said she lied.
She tried to stop them from investigating several people.
Tug484 wrote:
Ukraine also said she lied.
She tried to stop them from investigating several people.
Yep, a Do Not Investigate List that exists in the hands of one of the Ukrainians interviewed by Chanel Rion and Rudolph Giuliani in Ukraine. The man had the papers in his hand.
Dry Hair Yovanovitch lied about that list.
Tug484 wrote:
Ukraine also said she lied.
She tried to stop them from investigating several people.
So you have made up "crimes" that Trump committed vs. perjury. Remember the 70 years we were being screwed by every institution? And Epstein's banker did not commit suicide. This is all part of it. If they ever get around to it Biden plays a big part.
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
So you have made up "crimes" that Trump committed vs. perjury. Remember the 70 years we were being screwed by every institution? And Epstein's banker did not commit suicide. This is all part of it. If they ever get around to it Biden plays a big part.
I'm s**k of them saying Trump witheld aid to Ukraine unless they went after Biden.
After all, Biden stupidly admitted to millions of us that he did withhold aid unless they quit investigating Burisma.
The double standard is beyond comprehension.
The left can't think past their hatred for Trump and see the double standard.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.