proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

I know what’s wrong with you,Airfarce1!! You are very constipated,that is why you always talking about diapers full of Malarkey !! You really need an enema!!! Maybe more than one in your case!!!

Airforceone

Child

Airforceone

No just using the same h**e filled BS that (F)ing freak in the White House uses with his d********g language at his rallies and his h**e filled tweets everyday it’s the only language you people understand so if your offended by my post how come your not disgusted with what that toilet 15 flushes President tweets daily. Give me a break with your stupid comment

Airforceone

Actually 6ft 2inches tall 215 Lbs of romping stomping he’ll. So go get um diaper lady. Proud Republican equals a diaper full of Trump and Fox News BS

Airforceone

No just using the same language that Fat POS uses its the only language you people understand have a good evening

Airforceone

Hey very good diaper mouth

Airforceone

Put the diaper over your mouth there’s more BS coming out again. Your a disgrace why not just shut your mouth

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Are you 5 years old?? Does your mommy know you are playing with her computer ??

Airforceone

Not if it’s authorized by Congress you can’t block it. Only way to block by law is to patrician Congress to divert the funds. Typical Trump supporter Ignorance to the law. Where are democrats refusing to protect AMERICAN citizens.

Talk about protecting AMERICAN citizens we are watching children murdered in classrooms and your GD agenda is do nothing to protect the NRA so don’t give me your BS protecting AMERICAN citizens. How about protecting those kids. So don’t give me your BS that you care

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

DACA wasn't authorized by Congress,but your POS obama decided to use his pen and phone and he made these kids illegal!!!

American Vet

Typical liberal ignorance of the law:

"Congress long ago blessed p**********l authority to follow up an emergency declaration with deeds. In 1976, Congress enacted the National Emergency Act. While it terminated most existing emergencies, the NEA neither defined a national emergency nor limited the president’s ability to declare one. The law only sets out the process for publication and congressional notification for the president’s declaration. Every president has used the NEA to declare a national emergency, several under circumstances far less immediate than this one. The Supreme Court has never disagreed.

Not only do presidents have a reservoir of constitutional authority to respond to emergencies, but Congress has also enhanced it with the right to re-allocate military spending. Congress has passed at least two specific laws that give the president the power to t***sfer funds to a construction project, such as a wall, after a declaration of emergency. The first, Section 2808 of Title 10, states that if Trump declares an emergency “that requires use of the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense…may undertake military construction projects” using construction funding if it supports the armed forces.

A wall would clearly support the troops deployed at the border. A wall would make the troops safer by protecting them and reducing the size of migrant flows. A wall would also reduce the size of necessary deployments along the border by reducing the area that must be patrolled. Further, decisions over what “requires” the armed forces and what is “necessary to support” them traditionally have rested within the expertise of the president and have rarely, if ever, been second-guessed by the courts

A second law, Section 2293 of Title 33 of the U.S. Code, allows the secretary of Defense to reallocate funds from military construction projects if the president declares an emergency. This means the president can “terminate or defer the construction, operation, maintenance, or repair” of any project “he deems not essential to the national defense” and “apply the resources of the Department of the Army’s civil works program, including funds, personnel, and equipment” to military construction projects deemed essential."
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/yoo-and-peterson-trump-can-move-funds-for-border-wall-and-the-supreme-court-will-back-him

American Vet

So how does 'protecting the NRA' (which is actually defending freedom) have anything to do with protecting Americans? In fact, defending the NRA IS defending Americans. Or do you not believe in everyone's inherent right to defend themselves?

Radiance3

==============
You are WRONG AF1. SC approved president Trump use of fund from the Pentagon for border wall.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/07/28/supreme-court-trump-can-use-pentagon-funds-for-border-wall/

You Federal Court denial was due to that fact that he was a Barack Obama appointee. But the SCOTUS approved the Pentagon budget t***sfer for border wall. Border wall after all is covered under the Defense Dept. due to illegal intries and terrorists attacks.

Tug484

No, Americans lose.

Tug484

You sure aren't acting like anything but a spoiled brat.
You should really pay attention to something other than CNN and cartoons.