Change In Constitution Regarding Impeachment?
Dec 6, 2019 05:59:23 #
factnotfiction wrote:
Oh hell yeah, it is so amusing to see cons and trump supporters now wanting to change the constitution because dotard is getting impeached for being a criminal.
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Ya mean like pelosie not bothering to initiate impeachment proceedings at the outset of the socialist/dems attempt at a c**p ?
Dec 6, 2019 06:03:12 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If you Democrats had your way you would throw out the whole constitution. You do not respect it at all. That is why you are always running to some liberal judge who will twist it to fit your goal of the moment.
Funny how, all of a sudden, the Constitution means something to the socialist/ dems ! It never mattered under obummer's reign ! He wants "his house" back !
Dec 6, 2019 06:51:50 #
factnotfiction wrote:
This is your topic, and you are the one who wants a change to suit you.
That ain't how it works, so many changes should be made, keep pushing for change
That ain't how it works, so many changes should be made, keep pushing for change
There is a difference in changing it through the proper amendment process and doing it your way by having some liberal judge interpret it in a way it was never intended.
Dec 6, 2019 06:52:00 #
steve66613 wrote:
You’re right about changing the 2cnd amendment. I... (show quote)
Well said... The second Amendment is far more than a right to bear arms... It is an obligation of our citizenry to make ready a M*****a with sufficient arms to defend our Constitution and Government against ALL THREATS BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC... Especially if it is domestic... My feeling is attempting to change this fundemental inalienable right should be considered an act of s******n, if change is contrary to the original spirit and intent of the Founding Father's reasons for including it in our Constitution.
Dec 6, 2019 07:56:56 #
MICHAEL SALADEN wrote:
Well said... The second Amendment is far more than... (show quote)
amen to thatDec 6, 2019 07:57:55 #
Dec 6, 2019 08:02:32 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
It currently requires only a simple majority in the House for impeachment to take place. We are seeing how easy it is for the majority party to ram through an impeachment. It takes a 2/3 v**e in the Senate to convict and remove a President. This almost insures there has to be bi-partisan support. Should the Consitution be amended to require the same 2/3 in the House for impeachment thus requiring bi-partisan support?
No but perhaps it should be amended to require only a majority in the senate, or on second thought two thirds but with a mandated secret v**e.
Dec 6, 2019 08:21:22 #
factnotfiction wrote:
Oh hell yeah, it is so amusing to see cons and trump supporters now wanting to change the constitution because dotard is getting impeached for being a criminal.
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Many of us have absolutely no desire for a constitutional convention or similar effort. Quite happy with the original constitution as written.
Dec 6, 2019 09:20:34 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Kevyn wrote:
No but perhaps it should be amended to require only a majority in the senate, or on second thought two thirds but with a mandated secret v**e.
Why a secret v**e comrade? Besides everything what are you scared of?
Dec 6, 2019 09:40:24 #
JFlorio wrote:
Why a secret v**e comrade? Besides everything what are you scared of?
A trial should determine guilt or innocence based on fact and law not political realities. A senator in a deep red or blue state is forced to v**e not on right or wrong but do the bidding wrong or not of the people of their state. In all instances but impeachment this makes sense, however ether side of the isle they shouldn’t lose their jobs over a v**e of guilt or innocence.
Dec 6, 2019 09:43:58 #
Michael Rich
Loc: Lapine Oregon
Kevyn wrote:
A trial should determine guilt or innocence based on fact and law not political realities. A senator in a deep red or blue state is forced to v**e not on right or wrong but do the bidding wrong or not of the people of their state. In all instances but impeachment this makes sense, however ether side of the isle they shouldn’t lose their jobs over a v**e of guilt or innocence.
That's the scenario from l*****t Stooges.
Dec 6, 2019 09:50:54 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Kevyn wrote:
A trial should determine guilt or innocence based on fact and law not political realities. A senator in a deep red or blue state is forced to v**e not on right or wrong but do the bidding wrong or not of the people of their state. In all instances but impeachment this makes sense, however ether side of the isle they shouldn’t lose their jobs over a v**e of guilt or innocence.
You know nothing of the constitution or of anything else for that matter. The Founders wanted the trial in the Senate to require 2/3 so we wouldn’t have you snowflakes wanting to impeach the other party every time you didn’t get your way. Also we want our representatives to have the balls to stand up and be counted not hide in mommy’s basement like you.
Dec 6, 2019 10:23:42 #
factnotfiction wrote:
Oh hell yeah, it is so amusing to see cons and trump supporters now wanting to change the constitution because dotard is getting impeached for being a criminal.
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Great, hope all you cons are successful in getting congress to 'change the constitution', since there ar many changes that should be made, starting with the second amendment
Yeah, it's kind of like Pocahontas and Barbara Boxer wanting to get rid of the "e*******l college" you more on.
Dec 6, 2019 10:27:46 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
fullspinzoo wrote:
Yeah, it's kind of like Pocahontas and Barbara Boxer wanting to get rid of the "e*******l college" you more on.
If no E*******l College why even bother with Senators? For that matter why bother with States? Pure democracy is nothing more than mob rule.
Dec 6, 2019 11:27:02 #
JFlorio wrote:
If no E*******l College why even bother with Senators? For that matter why bother with States? Pure democracy is nothing more than mob rule.
But direct e******ns are just fine for every other elected office, right?
So is the 'mob rule' in effect for those e******ns?
And why are you bawling you eyes out over those e******ns?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.