What pumpkintrump so afraid of that he has to run to the Supremes? (Page 5): Actually, it is up to you to prove guilt. Not sure where you are from, but here in America one is innocent...

American Vet

tactful wrote:

ROFLMAO
it is not up to me to prove Putins innocence or guilt.
it is up to the GOP and republicans to prove it never happened.

Actually, it is up to you to prove guilt. Not sure where you are from, but here in America one is innocent until proven guilty.

So, prove away.

American Vet

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

The IRS isn't a law enforcement agency.

Didn't say it was - simply said they have had President Trumps tax returns and have most probably audited them. Had they found a discrepancy worthy of investigation, they would have involved a law enforcement agency.

Nothing reported, must not have found anything.

Do you think it is possible that democrats want to see the tax returns for political purposes? Surely not!!!!!

federally indicted mattoid

American Vet wrote:

Didn't say it was - simply said they have had President Trumps tax returns and have most probably audited them. Had they found a discrepancy worthy of investigation, they would have involved a law enforcement agency.

Nothing reported, must not have found anything.

Do you think it is possible that democrats want to see the tax returns for political purposes? Surely not!!!!!

Do you think he's hiding his inflated self-worth? And his tax fraud? Surely not!!!!!

Tug484

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Do you think he's hiding his inflated self-worth? And his tax fraud? Surely not!!!!!

When Maddow got her hands on a Trump tax return, he had paid 53 million in taxes.
I doubt he's inflated any of his worth.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

The IRS isn't a law enforcement agency.

You're right! Law enforcement doesn't have nearly the same power and authority.

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

American Vet wrote:

Actually, it is up to you to prove guilt. Not sure where you are from, but here in America one is innocent until proven guilty.

So, prove away.

can respond positively. born here,love my country,was nearly murdered for it.
disagree about proving.
the only people I owe my loyalty to
are those that never made me question theirs

if there's nothing to hide why can't trumpinoccio testify?
short answer: he'd be caught dead to rights by an entire planet,he knows it.
whine away defending so we can all watch 😎

American Vet

[quote=tactful] disagree about proving.

Just want to clarify: So you believe that a person accused of a crime must prove their innocence; and not the prosecutor prove their guilt?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

[quote=American Vet]

tactful wrote:

disagree about proving.

Just want to clarify: So you believe that a person accused of a crime must prove their innocence; and not the prosecutor prove their guilt?

He is a member of the Chaos and Confusion party....in very good standing.

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

[quote=American Vet]

tactful wrote:

disagree about proving.

Just want to clarify: So you believe that a person accused of a crime must prove their innocence; and not the prosecutor prove their guilt?

even guilty criminals testify on their own behalf and risk prosecutors wrath,
no so with someone above the law it seems,hint : nobody is ....
to verify : the T***h is Out there and right now it's reading-
F- false E - evidence A - appearing R - real
end of story.
what is he afraid of, being proven innocent?

federally indicted mattoid

tactful wrote:

can respond positively. born here,love my country,was nearly murdered for it.
disagree about proving.
the only people I owe my loyalty to
are those that never made me question theirs

if there's nothing to hide why can't trumpinoccio testify?
short answer: he'd be caught dead to rights by an entire planet,he knows it.
whine away defending so we can all watch 😎

You are making the cultists squirm.

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

You are making the cultists squirm.

short response below

tactful Loc: just North of the District of LMAO

byronglimish wrote:

He is a member of the Chaos and Confusion party....in very good standing.

once upon a time I was,get over yourself.

EmilyD

tactful wrote:

even guilty criminals testify on their own behalf and risk prosecutors wrath,
no so with someone above the law it seems,hint : nobody is ....
to verify : the T***h is Out there and right now it's reading-
F- false E - evidence A - appearing R - real
end of story.
what is he afraid of, being proven innocent?

Interesting -> False evidence appearing real? I agree wholeheartedly! That is just what the Dems are trying to do....except I would call it "NEAR": No Evidence Appearing Real.

federally indicted mattoid

EmilyD wrote:

Interesting -> False evidence appearing real? I agree wholeheartedly! That is just what the Dems are trying to do....except I would call it "NEAR": No Evidence Appearing Real.

Except, Emily, there is evidence galore.

Unless you're lying ears don't want to hear.

There are transcripts. With corroborating eye witness evidence.

And a few people who cannot or will not testify

EmilyD

useful mattoid 45 wrote:

Except, Emily, there is evidence galore.

Unless you're lying ears don't want to hear.

There are transcripts. With corroborating eye witness evidence.

And a few people who cannot or will not testify

That's very funny...the few people who cannot or will not testify??? Who is that?? Your corroborating eye witnesses??? The professors and Nadler's aunt Tessie??? You should stop using the word "transcripts"...it's not going to help you...just friendly observation.