Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
And I await his explanation as to what he deems "Z*****t" to mean..
While I have not read his book "Z*****m, The Real Enemy of The Jews", I have read excerpts. Here is Alan Hart's view of the distinction between Judiasm and Z*****m, which I accept, and have taken as my own:
"Judaism is the religion of Jews, not 'the' Jews because not all Jews are religious. Like Christianity and Islam, Judaism has at its core a set of moral values and ethical principles. Z*****m is Jewish nationalism in the form of a sectarian, colonial enterprise which, in the process of creating and then expanding in the Arab heartland a state for some Jews, made a mockery of Judaism's moral values and ethical principles and demonstrated contempt for international law and the human and political rights of the Palestinians."
Since it's founding in 1948, the use of "terrorism" by Israel has been an integral element of the Z*****t State. Read some of the writings by Theodore Herzl, Political Z*****m’s Founding Father, and Vladimir Jabotinsky, Founding Father of Z*****t militarism. Z*****m vs. Judaism
http://www.z*****mbook.com/#about-the-bookJabotinsky: From his book, [The Iron Wall] “Each people will struggle against colonizers until the last spark of hope that they can avoid the dangers of colonization and conquest is extinguished. The Palestinians will struggle in this way until there is hardly a spark of hope.”
"There can be no discussion of voluntary reconciliation between the Arabs, not now and not in the foreseeable future. All well-meaning people, with the exception of those blind from birth, understood long ago the complete impossibility of arriving at a voluntary agreement with the Arabs of Palestine for the t***sformation of Palestine from an Arab country to a country with a Jewish majority."
"All colonization, even the most restricted, must continue in defiance of the will of the native population. Therefore, it can continue and develop only under the shield of force which comprises an Iron Wall which the local population can never break through. This is our Arab policy. To formulate it any other way would be hypocrisy."
"Whether through the Balfour Declaration or the Mandate, external force is a necessity for establishing in the country conditions of rule and defense through which the local population, regardless of what it wishes, will be deprived of the possibility of impeding our colonization, administratively or physically. Force must play its role—with strength and without indulgence."
"Z*****m is a colonizing adventure and therefore it stands or it falls by the question of armed force."
"To the hackneyed reproach that this point of view is unethical, I answer—absolutely untrue. This is our ethic. There is no other ethic. As long as there is the faintest spark of hope for the Arabs to impede us, they will not sell these hopes—not for any sweet words nor for any tasty morsel, because this (the Palestinians) is not a rabble but a people, a living people. And no people makes such enormous concessions on such fateful questions, except when there is no hope left, until we have removed every opening visible in the Iron Wall." 15
If you think these are just words and do not have a bearing on actual events, I refer you to "Past Z*****t-Jewish Terrorism -Some Historical Facts".
https://rense.com/general21/pastz*****t.htmFollowing are just a few of the many massacres committed by Jewish-Z*****t terrorists, notably by the Z*****t Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gang groups.
1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.
2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.
3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.
4. Falameh, April 2, 1951.
5. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.
6. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.
7. Carmel, April 20, 1948.
8. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.
9. Al-Qabu, May 1, 1948.
10. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.
11. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.
12. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.
13. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.
14. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955
15. Az-Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.
16. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.
17. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.
18. As-Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.
19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.
20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.
21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.
22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.
23. Ar-Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.
24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.
25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.
26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.
Now, another quote from Alan Hart's book:
"Supporters of Israel right or wrong conflate Judaism and Z*****m because the assertion that they are one and the same enables them to claim that criticism of the Z*****t state of Israel is a manifestation of anti-Semitism. Often, almost always these days, the accusation that criticism of Israel is anti-Semitism is false. And this false charge is the blackmail card played to silence criticism of, and suppress informed and honest debate about, the Z*****t state and its policies. The reality is that Judaism and political Z*****m are total opposites, and knowledge of the difference is the key to understanding two things. One is why it is perfectly possible to be passionately anti-Z*****t - opposed to Z*****m's colonial enterprise - without being in any way, shape or form anti-Semitic (anti-Jew). The other is why it is wrong to blame all Jews everywhere for the crimes of the hard core Z*****t few in Palestine that became Israel."
Then there is the "The Z*****t Plan for the Middle East - T***slated and edited by -Israel Shahak
The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-z*****t-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815I will not even touch upon the issue of Z*****t control of the Media, and our political system due to the length of this post. But if you are interested, read this:
https://ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/introlobby.html. or this:
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/jewishlobby.shtmlWhy is it that anyone who criticizes Israel is always labeled an "anti-semite"? As former Israeli Minister states, "Anti-semitic", "its a trick we always use it"
https://youtu.be/D0kWAqZxJVEPennylynn - you refer to me as a "new world N**i" that wants the "extermination of every last Jew in the world" and that "Your shock will mirror the mock shock the "citizens" of Buchenwald. Your brand of H**E will never end!"
I will take that as an "upset reaction" to a subject that you are very passionate about. I do not hold this against you. I hope that if you, and perhaps others, read what I have taken the time write, you will feel differently. We may have our philosophical differences on the role that Israel vis a vis the rights of the Palestinian people, but I assure you that I do not harbor any ill feelings on the Jewish people living in Israel. I sincerely believe that they want peace with their neighbors. I take exception to the actions of their government, just as I do the many actions that our government takes relative to other nations.
Peace be to you!