That’s what you consider an attack chicken little? It was accurate. Possibly I could have said troll like. I’ll give you that. I did research it fool. Kinda how I found the other article. You found an article (one sided) that shed a bad light on Bevin, so you call him a scumbag then step back as if you’ve presented all the facts. Maybe you aren’t a troll. Just dumb.
factnotfiction wrote:
No, you are a lying sack on conscum, since you attacked me, and then lied and made the asinine claim that you "researched" this article.
You lie like your orange faced lord and savior, just not as well as he does
Which makes you an even more grotesque partisan dummy
Go away dumblying troll