One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Mark Levin on "Whistleblower Statutes"
Nov 26, 2019 09:49:51   #
fullspinzoo
 
Why keeping his name a secret is a complete joke. This guy is not a whistleblower, does not deserve whistleblower status or cover. OMT, twelve witnesses and 31 hours of testimony and they came up with "Zilch". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNFSImGAlU0 Excellent!!!!!

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 10:00:30   #
peg w
 
31 hours of testimony was not zilch.you have no audio comprehension if you say otherwise. The law says he doesn't have to reveal himself. Personally I think it is Kelly Ann Conway

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 10:02:28   #
bahmer
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Why keeping his name a secret is a complete joke. This guy is not a whistleblower, does not deserve whistleblower status or cover. OMT, twelve witnesses and 31 hours of testimony and they came up with "Zilch". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNFSImGAlU0 Excellent!!!!!


Amen and Amen

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2019 10:06:45   #
Kevyn
 
peg w wrote:
31 hours of testimony was not zilch.you have no audio comprehension if you say otherwise. The law says he doesn't have to reveal himself. Personally I think it is Kelly Ann Conway

My money is on Barron.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 10:25:48   #
fullspinzoo
 
peg w wrote:
31 hours of testimony was not zilch.you have no audio comprehension if you say otherwise. The law says he doesn't have to reveal himself. Personally I think it is Kelly Ann Conway


You don't get it. You can't claim "whistleblower status" just because you want anonymity. But it was fun watching scumbag Schiff lie about it, get 3 Pinocchios from a liberal newspaper, and then continue to lie about it again. Of course, he knows who the whistleblower is. Ove 100 million people know who the whistleblower is. Schiff let it slip who the whistleblower is. like everything he has done, it's a complete farce. Best article: the impeachment numbers are dropping like a rock. Pelosi and Schiff are trying desperately to "save face".

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 13:35:09   #
Lonewolf
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
You don't get it. You can't claim "whistleblower status" just because you want anonymity. But it was fun watching scumbag Schiff lie about it, get 3 Pinocchios from a liberal newspaper, and then continue to lie about it again. Of course, he knows who the whistleblower is. Ove 100 million people know who the whistleblower is. Schiff let it slip who the whistleblower is. like everything he has done, it's a complete farce. Best article: the impeachment numbers are dropping like a rock. Pelosi and Schiff are trying desperately to "save face".
You don't get it. You can't claim "whistlebl... (show quote)


good thing the others came along and proved beyond a doubt trumps guilt

Reply
Nov 27, 2019 06:08:12   #
Tug484
 
Lonewolf wrote:
good thing the others came along and proved beyond a doubt trumps guilt


They proved nothing other than he be didn't follow their protocol.
Well, it's not up to them to set the protocol.
It's for the president to do.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2019 12:12:10   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
peg w wrote:
31 hours of testimony was not zilch.you have no audio comprehension if you say otherwise. The law says he doesn't have to reveal himself. Personally I think it is Kelly Ann Conway


I think the AG legally is the one who decides who is and isn't a whistleblower. I don't recall Barr saying anything one way or the other. But maybe I missed it. All the Inquiry did was expose some more bad apples.

Reply
Nov 27, 2019 12:15:51   #
Mike Papa
 
Still molesting kids kevy?

Reply
Nov 27, 2019 18:56:04   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Why keeping his name a secret is a complete joke. This guy is not a whistleblower, does not deserve whistleblower status or cover. OMT, twelve witnesses and 31 hours of testimony and they came up with "Zilch". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNFSImGAlU0 Excellent!!!!!


I was testifying as an expert witness and had a gunsmith friend with me. It was all the big gun manufacturers. Remington was going out of business or they were close to it, but I found it strange that they were asking me about bump stocks. Anyway to start out here's an email I got today.
Rifle -THE NEW DEMOCRATIC ASSAULT RIFLE, (NEW???)


A hundred and twelve years ago, in 1907...our great grandparents were first able to buy the rifle pictured. The semi-auto Winchester Model 1907.

This is a gun they could buy from a Sears catalogue and have delivered via US Post. It was/ is a semi-automatic, high powered centerfire rifle, with detachable, high capacity magazine.

About 400,000 semi-automatic rifles were produced before WW2. Civilians had hundreds of thousands of these for 40 years, while US soldiers were still being issued old fashioned bolt action rifles.

The 1907 fired just as fast as an AR15 or AK47 and the bullet (.351 Winchester) was actually larger than those fired by the more modern looking weapons.

The ONLY functional difference between the 1907 and a controversial and much feared AR15 is the modern black plastic stock. AR does not mean assault rifle.

To summarize:

The semi auto, so-called "assault rifle" is 110 years old. It isnt new in any way.

The semi auto rifle was not a weapon of war. The government MADE IT a weapon of war 40 years after civilians had them.

The semi-auto can be safely owned by civilians. The proof is that literally 3 generations of adults owned and used them responsibly and no one ever even noticed.

Want to fix the horror of mass shootings? Fix the things that have changed for the worse in the last 50 years.

Cause the rifle technology in question was here long before this insanity.

There's that part. The bump stock question was was Trump's banning of it good or bad?
It was bad only in that it began chipping away at 2A. Good in that you have to understand a bump stock. No rifle was meant to shoot that rapidly. This is why the weapons jam or sometimes explode on you. What can be done to fix it? Buy a thicker barrel or a military grade one. Best idea is don't use one though.

Reply
Nov 27, 2019 19:29:56   #
Tug484
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
I was testifying as an expert witness and had a gunsmith friend with me. It was all the big gun manufacturers. Remington was going out of business or they were close to it, but I found it strange that they were asking me about bump stocks. Anyway to start out here's an email I got today.
Rifle -THE NEW DEMOCRATIC ASSAULT RIFLE, (NEW???)


A hundred and twelve years ago, in 1907...our great grandparents were first able to buy the rifle pictured. The semi-auto Winchester Model 1907.

This is a gun they could buy from a Sears catalogue and have delivered via US Post. It was/ is a semi-automatic, high powered centerfire rifle, with detachable, high capacity magazine.

About 400,000 semi-automatic rifles were produced before WW2. Civilians had hundreds of thousands of these for 40 years, while US soldiers were still being issued old fashioned bolt action rifles.

The 1907 fired just as fast as an AR15 or AK47 and the bullet (.351 Winchester) was actually larger than those fired by the more modern looking weapons.

The ONLY functional difference between the 1907 and a controversial and much feared AR15 is the modern black plastic stock. AR does not mean assault rifle.

To summarize:

The semi auto, so-called "assault rifle" is 110 years old. It isnt new in any way.

The semi auto rifle was not a weapon of war. The government MADE IT a weapon of war 40 years after civilians had them.

The semi-auto can be safely owned by civilians. The proof is that literally 3 generations of adults owned and used them responsibly and no one ever even noticed.

Want to fix the horror of mass shootings? Fix the things that have changed for the worse in the last 50 years.

Cause the rifle technology in question was here long before this insanity.

There's that part. The bump stock question was was Trump's banning of it good or bad?
It was bad only in that it began chipping away at 2A. Good in that you have to understand a bump stock. No rifle was meant to shoot that rapidly. This is why the weapons jam or sometimes explode on you. What can be done to fix it? Buy a thicker barrel or a military grade one. Best idea is don't use one though.
I was testifying as an expert witness and had a gu... (show quote)


It's really crazy.
There used to be a gun propped in a corner of any room.
We never got told to not touch them, we knew they could hurt us or someone.
We never sneaked one out to harm anyone or to accidentally shoot ourselves.
The problem is most oarents don't show the kids how they work or have the wrong discipline.
It's strange to me that this is an issue now.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.