He's not a f**e president; He was constitutionally elected therefore your denial rejects the Constitution. What is f**e is the Progressives notion that they are virtuous and Conservatives are evil. Something that backwards, something that wrong, something that completely false disregards the evil immorality Progressives fought for and were very successful in promoting. They could not have accomplished this Herculean objective without Satanic assistanc. Too many weak, but otherwise good, people got swept up. You want to know how? Progressives turned the Constitution against America by adding additional "rights" unheard of previously. Everyone knows "rights" are a good thing huh? The k*****g of over 60 million unborn children is the reproductive "right" of women. If it's a social justice right it can't be wrong until one steps back to consider how morally corrupt America has become; a corruption progressives celebrate as a moral objective won.

Well...let's see: The EC only has 3 mandates to determine who to select for president. They are: 1) a person aged 35 or up, 2) a person with the requisite experience to lead, and 3) a person of good character. So, I guess since we got one out of 3 -the first one - that's good enough for republicans right? Add in all the help from Russia via the NRA -and you get a "f**e president."

You speak of "adding rights" to the Constitution....are you not aware that doing that very thing was envisioned by the Founding Fathers? We call those "amendments" -and when done properly by Congress - they become law.
Sadly, the r****m in America remains, after all of these years. Question: why was it that when women finally won the right to v**e in 1920 -that only applied to white women? Lincoln freed the s***es in 1861 -if memory serves. Why is it to this very day, that the Minority V****g Ri tghts Act must be re-approved by Congress every 50 years instead of being perpetual? You might consider doing some research before jumping to the false conclusion that the Constitution is infallible.
Yes, I support and even defend our Constitution, (yes, I served on active duty in combat) but that does not mean it cannot be improved -which is why the Fathers made way for adding amendments.
On the subject of a******n, once again my stance is this: that is a decision between the woman, her doctor, and God. My God teaches "follow the law of the land" -so if the majority v**es it in as law - I have two choices: 1) openly support the law even if I disagree, or keep silent, or 2) work to change the laws that I disagree with. No where in my thought process is there a choice to ignore 1 and 2 above while bashing the women who exercise their legal right. Would it be okay with you if we flipped the script and demanded that all males over age 30 get vasectomies? At least that way no one can be accused of "k*****g innocent" babies right?
Finally, speaking about moral corruption. How can you fix your fingers to write such a thing knowing full well that your f**e president is the epitome of corruption? You know the definition of hypocrisy right? Since the age of 3 when his daddy used Trump as a tax write-off to the tune of 3 million dollars, Trump has been flawed to the core.

You seem to quickly pounce on even the slightest, fabricated notion you hear of or see about democrats....why can't you do the same when it comes to Trump? No need to answer that last question....we already know why.

You confuse two separate issues. If you were to follow God's law then you cannot effectively follow the "laws of the land" in most cases. Perhaps a better way to view it would be to consider what God said regarding, "be ye not of this world, but rather be ye t***sformed in your MIND...."

One interpretation says that I can obey the laws of the land and still please God, as long as those laws do not violate God's laws. You also have to remember that the sacrifice of Jesus "covers a multitude of sin." For example: how can America claim to be following God's laws -yet we allow and defend those who are gay or homosexual -an a*********n before God? I think the main point to focus upon is centered (as everything else is) around the two greatest commandments:

1. To love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, all thy mind, and all thy soul, and
2. Love your neighbors as you love yourself.

You see, I can love my neighbor -even if he/she is a homosexual because God is the judge - not me. God alone has the power to ultimately forgive and save -not man. So, if you focus on "being the best visible representation that YOU can be of the invisible Christ" -and conduct yourself accordingly - all that's left is what Christ said: "I will set all things in order when I return."

One last point, do you believe that Christians who follow the laws of the land that do violate God's laws will be spared consequences? What if the "law of the land" directly violates God's laws? Lets' be clear:
Trump and the current republicans have done nearly all they can to disparage immigration in this country, mostly, but not limited to people with brown skin. Leviticus 19:33 teaches, "...do not forsake the foreigners who live among you, treat them with kindness, for you all were once immigrants and I am the Lord thy God." Notice, God said nothing about "immigrants from Norway, or 's**thole countries' or only the rich immigrants. Yet, everyday we see ICE under Trump's orders defying the very laws of God.

Padre - you can't have your cake and eat it too - at least not with God -there is no straddling of the fence. Either you believe and do your best to be obedient (trust that God already knows that most of us will still fall short, He provided remedy for that through Jesus) to the will of God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit which resides in all believers. The choice is really no choice in my opinion....I choose God and eternal life.