One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Sondland's plausible deniability.
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Nov 20, 2019 12:08:30   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering memory. I am listening to hisfailing and recovering recollection of events as if he just can't say anything for sure and thus anything, can be denied or affirmed as having been remembered or forgotten, or even later remembers or remembered incorrectly without the proper "trigger" from others who might have been there.

I think Cohen was more reliable. LOL!

As he is putting it, he could lie and later call it an accidental lie. Or remember something and claim that it was an accidental omission. Hello?????

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 12:10:14   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Sondland just claimed that he never connected the Biden's with Burisma. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sometimes there are just not enough LOL's.

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 12:19:26   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Sondland just claimed that he never connected the Biden's with Burisma. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sometimes there are just not enough LOL's.


I'm watching, and this guy claims to know nothing until he's told what to know.
He's desperatly trying to cover his ass.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2019 12:46:37   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'm watching, and this guy claims to know nothing until he's told what to know.
He's desperatly trying to cover his ass.


In a big way!

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 12:55:29   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
In a big way!


I bet he really needs to pee about now considering the amount he's drinking! He's nervous, making his mouth dry!

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:01:37   #
Elmer Werth
 
I"m 98 and perhaps a little slow sometimes but Mr. Sondland must be substantially younger and what's his excuse? One thing about this; if the Dems spend all their money hiring witnesses, perhaps the media may have to settle for less. Another possibility of course is that the deep state may be able to intimidate by threats that convert vulnerable people into being a witness. It has been a long and boring war between evil and substantially less evil.
Elmer Werth

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:03:18   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering memory. I am listening to hisfailing and recovering recollection of events as if he just can't say anything for sure and thus anything, can be denied or affirmed as having been remembered or forgotten, or even later remembers or remembered incorrectly without the proper "trigger" from others who might have been there.

I think Cohen was more reliable. LOL!

As he is putting it, he could lie and later call it an accidental lie. Or remember something and claim that it was an accidental omission. Hello?????
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering me... (show quote)

And his really smooth defense was to say that the state department and white house has obstructed the investigation by not releasing notes and phone records that would help him put together a better recollection. The fact remains that the white house and state department is obstructing this impeachment investigation, and this is not a never trumper, this is one of Trump's brilliant staff choices.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2019 13:06:20   #
woodguru
 
Elmer Werth wrote:
I"m 98 and perhaps a little slow sometimes but Mr. Sondland must be substantially younger and what's his excuse? One thing about this; if the Dems spend all their money hiring witnesses, perhaps the media may have to settle for less. Another possibility of course is that the deep state may be able to intimidate by threats that convert vulnerable people into being a witness. It has been a long and boring war between evil and substantially less evil.
Elmer Werth

And of course the main answer is for trump to let everyone involved who knows something testify, let the t***h rule the day.

You are 98, did you in this long life ever pick up any wisdom concerning the t***h and what obstructing it generally means. I'm only 64 but I've figured out that thiose who hide the t***h are hiding things that will hurt them.

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:07:32   #
woodguru
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'm watching, and this guy claims to know nothing until he's told what to know.
He's desperatly trying to cover his ass.

Undoubtedly, he is not intending to go to jail covering Trump's dumb ass.

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:21:38   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
And his really smooth defense was to say that the state department and white house has obstructed the investigation by not releasing notes and phone records that would help him put together a better recollection. The fact remains that the white house and state department is obstructing this impeachment investigation, and this is not a never trumper, this is one of Trump's brilliant staff choices.


You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:22:33   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
Undoubtedly, he is not intending to go to jail covering Trump's dumb ass.


Well, he's definitely lied to Congress.

Reply
 
 
Nov 20, 2019 13:32:08   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.

When charges are phony is when you provide the t***h, bring out the facts. This idea that he is hiding the facts because they will be used against him is truly moronic.

Here's the reality, the facts are actually worse than what we already know.

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:33:13   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.

The pie hole is a mouth, what are you referring to?

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:35:24   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
When charges are phony is when you provide the t***h, bring out the facts. This idea that he is hiding the facts because they will be used against him is truly moronic.

Here's the reality, the facts are actually worse than what we already know.


I haven't heard anything that I could consider "fact". Only assumption, supposition, and conjectures.
Where is the smoking gun?

Reply
Nov 20, 2019 13:39:40   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
The pie hole is a mouth, what are you referring to?


In your case, it would be a tofu hole.....

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.