Sondland's plausible deniability.
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering memory. I am listening to hisfailing and recovering recollection of events as if he just can't say anything for sure and thus anything, can be denied or affirmed as having been remembered or forgotten, or even later remembers or remembered incorrectly without the proper "trigger" from others who might have been there.
I think Cohen was more reliable. LOL!
As he is putting it, he could lie and later call it an accidental lie. Or remember something and claim that it was an accidental omission. Hello?????
Sondland just claimed that he never connected the Biden's with Burisma. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sometimes there are just not enough LOL's.
nwtk2007 wrote:
Sondland just claimed that he never connected the Biden's with Burisma. LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sometimes there are just not enough LOL's.
I'm watching, and this guy claims to know nothing until he's told what to know.
He's desperatly trying to cover his ass.
nwtk2007 wrote:
In a big way!
I bet he really needs to pee about now considering the amount he's drinking! He's nervous, making his mouth dry!
I"m 98 and perhaps a little slow sometimes but Mr. Sondland must be substantially younger and what's his excuse? One thing about this; if the Dems spend all their money hiring witnesses, perhaps the media may have to settle for less. Another possibility of course is that the deep state may be able to intimidate by threats that convert vulnerable people into being a witness. It has been a long and boring war between evil and substantially less evil.
Elmer Werth
nwtk2007 wrote:
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering memory. I am listening to hisfailing and recovering recollection of events as if he just can't say anything for sure and thus anything, can be denied or affirmed as having been remembered or forgotten, or even later remembers or remembered incorrectly without the proper "trigger" from others who might have been there.
I think Cohen was more reliable. LOL!
As he is putting it, he could lie and later call it an accidental lie. Or remember something and claim that it was an accidental omission. Hello?????
Dear Mr Sondland and his failing and recovering me... (
show quote)
And his really smooth defense was to say that the state department and white house has obstructed the investigation by not releasing notes and phone records that would help him put together a better recollection. The fact remains that the white house and state department is obstructing this impeachment investigation, and this is not a never trumper, this is one of Trump's brilliant staff choices.
Elmer Werth wrote:
I"m 98 and perhaps a little slow sometimes but Mr. Sondland must be substantially younger and what's his excuse? One thing about this; if the Dems spend all their money hiring witnesses, perhaps the media may have to settle for less. Another possibility of course is that the deep state may be able to intimidate by threats that convert vulnerable people into being a witness. It has been a long and boring war between evil and substantially less evil.
Elmer Werth
And of course the main answer is for trump to let everyone involved who knows something testify, let the t***h rule the day.
You are 98, did you in this long life ever pick up any wisdom concerning the t***h and what obstructing it generally means. I'm only 64 but I've figured out that thiose who hide the t***h are hiding things that will hurt them.
archie bunker wrote:
I'm watching, and this guy claims to know nothing until he's told what to know.
He's desperatly trying to cover his ass.
Undoubtedly, he is not intending to go to jail covering Trump's dumb ass.
woodguru wrote:
And his really smooth defense was to say that the state department and white house has obstructed the investigation by not releasing notes and phone records that would help him put together a better recollection. The fact remains that the white house and state department is obstructing this impeachment investigation, and this is not a never trumper, this is one of Trump's brilliant staff choices.
You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.
woodguru wrote:
Undoubtedly, he is not intending to go to jail covering Trump's dumb ass.
Well, he's definitely lied to Congress.
nwtk2007 wrote:
You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.
When charges are phony is when you provide the t***h, bring out the facts. This idea that he is hiding the facts because they will be used against him is truly moronic.
Here's the reality, the facts are actually worse than what we already know.
nwtk2007 wrote:
You don't actually expect them to bend over and take it up the proverbial pie hole do you? Especially when the "charges" are phoney.
The pie hole is a mouth, what are you referring to?
woodguru wrote:
When charges are phony is when you provide the t***h, bring out the facts. This idea that he is hiding the facts because they will be used against him is truly moronic.
Here's the reality, the facts are actually worse than what we already know.
I haven't heard anything that I could consider "fact". Only assumption, supposition, and conjectures.
Where is the smoking gun?
woodguru wrote:
The pie hole is a mouth, what are you referring to?
In your case, it would be a tofu hole.....
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.