nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

http://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-lee-zeldin-impeachment-hearings-new-development


Mark Sandy is an official of the Office of Management and Budget. He testified behind closed doors Friday afternoon.

"According to Zeldin, Sandy "went right to the heart of why there was a hold on aid to Ukraine" during his Saturday deposition, and called for a release of the transcripts containing Sandy's statement in time for week two of public hearings."

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."


Good or bad for Trump???

Liberty Tree

If I had to guess I would say good.

elledee

no matter what its all good for Trump the more this goes on.... more and more people become aware that its not illegal for the President to ask a foreign leader to look into something most people know Biden and his son did. The hearings are mostly one big mountain of manure that the demonrats think they will find a horse in that impeachment can ride on.....and lets not forget the huge amount of time and money these self serving hacks are stealing from the tax payers...the people are watching and next e******n the dirtyrats will be doing two things.... updating their resume's and cleaning out their desks.....MAGA!!!!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Well yes, it's like there is this big old sign saying that there is some kind of BS going on with Biden, his son and Burisma, possibly the Ukraine gov as well. Like, HELLO, there is corruption here!!!!!! LOL!

How could Trump NOT want it checked out? Only the Obama administration would have let this go, and in fact, they did; with it right in front of their noses!!!!!

PeterS

Sandy testified even though he was TOLD NOT TO testify by the WH. Do you think that means it's all going to be sunshine and lollypops for Donald to dance around? 007, you really crack me up.

PeterS

Question, do you think EVERYONE is as oblivious to the happenings in the WH as you are? I knew from the beginning that you conservatives would see things completely different than liberals would because you have to else you will be admitting how corrupt Trump really is...and we all know that will never happen.

So you and I are irrelevant and the question to be asked is, will those who don't have their heads inserted up Trump's colon see things the way you see them. You think they will but here you have a man [Sandy] who has worked under Republicans and Democrats and whose only loyalty is to the Constitution and the country that he loves. You think his testimony is going to be "all good" even though it's obvious that he wouldn't testify if he didn't think something was very wrong with how the WH and needed to be done.

If you need something to hang onto, Mark Meadows said that Sandy showed that there was nothing nefarious going on. So do you think a man who was told not to show up did so anyway for the purpose of showing that nothing was going on? Hang onto that if you need to but to anyone but a conservative the answer will be obvious what he actually said...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

"According to Zeldin, Sandy "went right to the heart of why there was a hold on aid to Ukraine"

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

"A great answer given, a very informative answer by Mark Sandy," Zeldin said, "and I think it would change some of the answers given by some of these other witnesses this week."

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

I think I agree, I'd have to know why he's waiting.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I think it's going to blow a few testimonies out of the water. Vindman for one.

Auntie Lulu