One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How Dumb Is Adam Schiff?
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 15, 2019 08:32:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Paybacktimeishere wrote:
How Dumb Is Adam Schiff?

Dumber, or More Moronic, Than a genuine, low IQ,( Diagnosed by a Qualified
Pscychiatrist, M.D., at any Certified, Mental,
Asylum, anywhere in The World. ). [IMO], A Genuine, ‘IMBECILE’, with a Prognosis, of simply being, an incorrigible,“DEAD END”! He is “UNFIT”, to be anything,
other, than a Feeble, Unprofessional, LIAR, & a “White Renegade”. A “GEORGE SOROS, APPROVED”, ANTI-AMERICAN, CORRUPT. C*******T/G*******T, TOTALLY WITHOUT A CONSCIOUS, or A Care; About Anyone, Or
Anything, But Himself, & His R****ded, “DEEP STATE”, SUPPORTED, GOAL; of “Socially Engineering”, A ‘NEW’, UNRECOGNIZABLE, SOCIALISED, POLITICALLY CORRECT, MULTICULTURALLY DIVERSE, NON-CHRISTIAN,
OLIGARCHY!? A SORT OF DEMOCRATIC, ULTRA PERVERTED, PLUTOCRACY??
GOD BLESS AMERICA, & May WE, ‘The People’, “WAKE UP”, & “TAKE THE OFFENCE”, Before It IS, TOO LATE!!!
How Dumb Is Adam Schiff? br br ... (show quote)


Gutfeld on Adams Schiff's lies
https://youtu.be/3wKEnKoc1x8

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 08:34:22   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
greenmountaineer wrote:
Well, you can call him names, as if you were a silly 4th grade kid, and you can make bizaar claims that he's dumb, (which I suspect he is not, as he has been a successful federal prosecutor) but if you watch and listen to what the Republicans in that committee are saying and what has been going on in this country for the past 3 years, and start thinking like an American instead of like a Republican or Democrat, you might come to a different conclusion. I used to v**e Republican back when guys like Eisenhower, George Aiken, and Dean Davis were leaders of that party. But it isn't the same anymore. It has morphed into a party of corruption, and when this is all over it will be exposed as a party of treason as well.
Well, you can call him names, as if you were a si... (show quote)



Either you are a liar like Schitf, or suffering dementia.

You people are the mob attempting a c**p.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 08:54:58   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Adam Schiff is so dumb he’d wear a tuxedo to an interview for a job as a garbage collector.

In my entire life, I have never seen anyone change his story as many times as this pinhead has. He has lied so many times on the “so called whistleblower” that he can’t seem to keep his story straight. This is what happens with a chronic liar. They lie so many times and on so many issues, they can’t remember how to maintain a lies “continuity” and they are easily exposed.

Just like Hillary, Pelosi, Sanders, Harris, Warren and soooooo many other Democrats, they fail to acknowledge the lies even when their lies were caught on tape. When confronted with a reporter challenging a lie, they either deny it, say they misspoke or make a fast exit off the stage.

The Democrats have absolutely no credibility! Just goes to show you title does not correspond with character. You would expect someone appointed as Chairman of the Intelligence Committee in the House to have intelligence, integrity, honesty, fairness, and wisdom. Schiff has none of these qualities. Hey Adam! Get out your “tuxedo” and go find a job more “suited for your talent and qualifications!”
Adam Schiff is so dumb he’d wear a tuxedo to an in... (show quote)


"Adam Schiff is so dumb he’d wear a tuxedo to an interview for a job as a garbage collector. " - tbutkovich

Do you think Adam is capably either physically or mentally to handle those jobs?

He is mighty skinny.

What's a liberal to do when a Republican is better at compassion?
Adam reads nursery rymes (LOL)
https://youtu.be/tGMeZ01_eco

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2019 09:24:31   #
greenmountaineer Loc: Vermont
 
byronglimish wrote:
Only someone with a reprobate thinking process, would deny that Adam Schitf lied when he denied knowing the identity of the whistleblower.

Do you think Schitf lied about that.?


I have no idea, no evidence and therefore canmake no informed conclusion. And what difference does it make? We are now getting testimony from folks with better information than this whistleblower ever had.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 09:26:54   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
greenmountaineer wrote:
I have no idea, no evidence and therefore canmake no informed conclusion. And what difference does it make? We are now getting testimony from folks with better information than this whistleblower ever had.


But of course. You and Schitf won't allow any opposing testimony.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 09:31:50   #
greenmountaineer Loc: Vermont
 
byronglimish wrote:
Only someone with a reprobate thinking process, would deny that Adam Schitf lied when he denied knowing the identity of the whistleblower.

Do you think Schitf lied about that.?


I have no idea and no evidence from which to make an informed conclusion as to whether he lied or not. I will take him at his word for now. And what difference does it make? We are now getting testimony from folks who have more direct knowledge of what went on than the whistleblower ever had.

There are Federal laws that protect the identity of whistleblowers. Such people are important. They help us keep the government in control. If they are exposed, they can be punished (which I understand happened during the Obama administration to a couple of them) and this discourages other people from exposing government corruption. So start thinking like an American instead of a Republican or Democrat.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 11:30:10   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
greenmountaineer wrote:
I have no idea and no evidence from which to make an informed conclusion as to whether he lied or not. I will take him at his word for now. And what difference does it make? We are now getting testimony from folks who have more direct knowledge of what went on than the whistleblower ever had.

There are Federal laws that protect the identity of whistleblowers. Such people are important. They help us keep the government in control. If they are exposed, they can be punished (which I understand happened during the Obama administration to a couple of them) and this discourages other people from exposing government corruption. So start thinking like an American instead of a Republican or Democrat.
I have no idea and no evidence from which to make ... (show quote)


Hannity: DNC scandal will haunt Hillary Clinton
https://youtu.be/z3hBiLBlLSk

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2019 11:43:26   #
Idaho
 

There are Federal laws that protect the identity of whistleblowers”

No there are not. The laws only protect whistleblowers from employment retribution.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 12:00:03   #
tbutkovich
 
greenmountaineer wrote:
I have no idea and no evidence from which to make an informed conclusion as to whether he lied or not. I will take him at his word for now. And what difference does it make? We are now getting testimony from folks who have more direct knowledge of what went on than the whistleblower ever had.

There are Federal laws that protect the identity of whistleblowers. Such people are important. They help us keep the government in control. If they are exposed, they can be punished (which I understand happened during the Obama administration to a couple of them) and this discourages other people from exposing government corruption. So start thinking like an American instead of a Republican or Democrat.
I have no idea and no evidence from which to make ... (show quote)


Need to take the whistleblower definition in the correct context. Add some adjectives and the whole definition of “the whistleblower” changes. As an example: The correct context should be: “politically motivated whisteblower or politically biased whistleblower!” When the whistleblower is not allowed to come forward and be cross-examined by the defendant, in this case, the President of the United States, the definition can be expanded to the following: “the protected politically biased whistleblower,” who by this definition has the freedom to commit perjury without any recourse by the defendant. This makes it a “only the whistleblower’s voice matters” situation. If this miscarriage of justice occurs in the impeachment proceedings, the process is a complete sham!

All intelligent Americans see what is going on here. I am concerned that if the party of evil, the Democrats, were to obtain complete control of our government, anyone opposed to this powerful cabal would be silenced or, if outspoken, susceptible to injustice and possible incarceration. We are facing a real crisis in our nation. I am extremely saddened by the Democrats decision to move forward with this sham impeachment process!

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 12:37:54   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Need to take the whistleblower definition in the correct context. Add some adjectives and the whole definition of “the whistleblower” changes. As an example: The correct context should be: “politically motivated whisteblower or politically biased whistleblower!” When the whistleblower is not allowed to come forward and be cross-examined by the defendant, in this case, the President of the United States, the definition can be expanded to the following: “the protected politically biased whistleblower,” who by this definition has the freedom to commit perjury without any recourse by the defendant. This makes it a “only the whistleblower’s voice matters” situation. If this miscarriage of justice occurs in the impeachment proceedings, the process is a complete sham!

All intelligent Americans see what is going on here. I am concerned that if the party of evil, the Democrats, were to obtain complete control of our government, anyone opposed to this powerful cabal would be silenced or, if outspoken, susceptible to injustice and possible incarceration. We are facing a real crisis in our nation. I am extremely saddened by the Democrats decision to move forward with this sham impeachment process!
Need to take the whistleblower definition in the c... (show quote)


"Need to take the whistleblower definition in the correct context. Add some adjectives and the whole definition of “the whistleblower” changes. As an example: The correct context should be: “politically motivated whisteblower or politically biased whistleblower!” When the whistleblower is not allowed to come forward and be cross-examined by the defendant, in this case, the President of the United States, the definition can be expanded to the following: “the protected politically biased whistleblower,” who by this definition has the freedom to commit perjury without any recourse by the defendant. This makes it a “only the whistleblower’s voice matters” situation. If this miscarriage of justice occurs in the impeachment proceedings, the process is a complete sham! " - tbutkovich

Great differentiation between;"“politically motivated whisteblower" and " politically biased whistleblower!"



"All intelligent Americans see what is going on here. I am concerned that if the party of evil, the Democrats, were to obtain complete control of our government, anyone opposed to this powerful cabal would be silenced or, if outspoken, susceptible to injustice and possible incarceration. We are facing a real crisis in our nation." - tbutkovich

Right on


The Republicans should bring up this sham in the next e******ns in 2020.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 15:33:04   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Adam Schiff has so mastered the “art of deceit,” that he can “tell a lie without blinking!”


I don't think that there is a scale going down low enough to measure how dumb.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2019 15:36:15   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
I don't think that there is a scale going down low enough to measure how dumb.


That SOB just ended the proceedings with a speech from himself, then closed down the meeting; refusing the Republicans a final statement.
That evil SOB disgusts me.

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 15:45:51   #
Tug484
 
byronglimish wrote:
Only someone with a reprobate thinking process, would deny that Adam Schitf lied when he denied knowing the identity of the whistleblower.

Do you think Schitf lied about that.?



Reply
Nov 15, 2019 18:30:57   #
maryla
 
Kevyn wrote:
Schiff was an effective and well respected federal prosecutor, he is used to dealing with racketeering prosecutions he is running this impeachment inquiry; to borrow a favorite word from your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer, perfectly.


His eyes buldge out....he has nothing impeachable. He should be ashamed of himself...

Reply
Nov 15, 2019 19:01:10   #
EmilyD
 
eagleye13 wrote:
That SOB just ended the proceedings with a speech from himself, then closed down the meeting; refusing the Republicans a final statement.
That evil SOB disgusts me.

If nothing else, Americans are getting an earful and eyeful of how truly deranged the Dems are. The more this goes on, the more Americans will see the corruption that is going on - especially with Schiff.

You used the right word, Eagleye, when you said Schiff is evil. He even looks like he's possessed.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.