proud republican wrote:
New shining word of the day.......drum rolls pl... (
show quote)
So follow the case so you know what the facts are you ignorant russian.
woodguru wrote:
So follow the case so you know what the facts are you ignorant russian.
She has a Hell of a lot more perception than you have managed to show.
[quote=Lonewolf]It was all legal it was no different than a grand jury meeting on closed doors to decide whether to prosecute or not starting Wednesday you're going to see Trump's many crimes and hear the witnesses themselves all out in the open the whole world to see.
No of course you're only defenses is try to attack any Witness attacked her loyalty to America their honesty their integrity and smear them in any way you can that is not a defense that's going to work.
If you think about it if we're all equal under the law why should anyone be compelled to do anything that Trump refuses to do like answer questions under oath.
Lastly remember Trump started this everything that's happening in him he brought on himself. What Republicans need to think about do they save a criminal president and lose the Senate because you're not going to be able to have both.[/quote
The reps won't be allowed witnesses.
Schiff said no to everyone of them.
woodguru wrote:
So follow the case so you know what the facts are you ignorant russian.
You're a punk. I'd bet a thousand dollars she would score considerably higher on an American civics exam than you.
proud republican wrote:
New shining word of the day.......drum rolls pl... (
show quote)
Not only that, Zelensky didn't provide any consideration, such as conduct any type of investigation, before he got the military aid.
For extortion to have occurred, Zelensky would have to have done something of value to Trump. He didn't do anything. And he still got the aid.
proud republican wrote:
New shining word of the day.......drum rolls pl... (
show quote)
President Zelenski knew of the extortion back in May after a visit from Giuliani.
rjoeholl wrote:
You're a punk. I'd bet a thousand dollars she would score considerably higher on an American civics exam than you.
She doesn’t even have a basic understanding of our constitution, but then again neither does Donny five chins.
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Source?
You'll need a Delorean to find that out.
Kevyn wrote:
She doesn’t even have a basic understanding of our constitution, but then again neither does Donny five chins.
Hey kevy, show me in the constitution where it says Congress has over sight powers over the president.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Kevyn wrote:
Your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer is dripping with guilt, take the opportunity to watch the hearings on C-span or PBS free of the unhinged false outrage of Fox, listen to the testimony, come to honest opinion about what evidence is presented and the veracity of the witnesses and make an informed decision. The question to ask ourself as a nation is if the e*******l college has the right to saddle our country with an obviously criminal president.
C-span?...hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahohohohohohohohohohoh...........PBS?....hahahohohohohohaha
hahhohoho....I'm dying here kevie...stop it...you're making me hurt I'm laughing so hard.
maximus
Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
woodguru wrote:
So follow the case so you know what the facts are you ignorant russian.
You're so funny woodie, she has actually lived in a country where what your party is trying to promote actually exists. She left it with good reason. She h**es it with good reason. She is loyal to this country for good reason.
You've lived in America all of your life, had your freedoms protected, never had to worry about an all powerful state...pretty cushy all told. Yet you h**e the freedoms she longed for in her native country, you are working to make the USA the country she had to leave, and you deride the one man who threw this country forward like a 115 MPH fast ball.
I have never understood why.
Kevyn wrote:
Your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer is dripping with guilt, take the opportunity to watch the hearings on C-span or PBS free of the unhinged false outrage of Fox, listen to the testimony, come to honest opinion about what evidence is presented and the veracity of the witnesses and make an informed decision. The question to ask ourself as a nation is if the e*******l college has the right to saddle our country with an obviously criminal president.
Kevyn,
Your lack of understanding concerning the e*******l college is very evident. It seems as though your civics teacher either failed you or deliberately misled you.
Some things that you do not seem to understand:
The United States of America is not a nation of people, it is, as it's name implies, a nation of states.
The states elect both the President and the Vice-President.
They do so by electing a slate of delegates to what is called The E*******l College with instructions to cast their v**es for a particular pair candidates. If one nominee fails to receive a majority of the v**es the delegates they are permitted to change their v**e on subsequent b****ts.
So, the e*******l college did not "saddle" us with any thing. They did what they were supposed to do and expressed the will of the people of the states by casting the majority of their v**es for now President Donald Trump and Vice-President Mike Pence.
You should be glad that they did and hope that they will again in 2020.
There is a long list of countries down through history wherein the people have allowed a person who promised them "everything" to gain control of their government and then found that they had lost everything, including their freedom.
Class dismissed and will be reconvened when needed.
proud republican wrote:
New shining word of the day.......drum rolls pl... (
show quote)
Sondland said that "President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden, which Giuliani was pressing for" than the U.S. policies on Ukraine, according to Taylor.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.