Fire, Fire...so tell me why it matters who called the fire department? (Page 2): And another 2 dozen who are naysayers. Politics as usual in DC...

debeda

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

And another 2 dozen who are naysayers. Politics as usual in DC

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

If the fkr SET the fire, I have a problem and you should too.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Kevyn wrote:

It only matters if you are protecting the arsonist.

Only??? No. It also matters if you are the arsonist.

Big dog

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

He’s a paid informer, a spy. His testimony is not credible or admissible as evidence.

rjoeholl

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

And there's the rub. If they name all of the so-called witnesses, why won't they name the accuser? Seems they're ALL accusing him.

rjoeholl

BigMike wrote:

Only??? No. It also matters if you are the arsonist.

BINGO!!!

billy a Loc: South Florida

This whole shebang lacks clarity...an intended consequence designed to prolong the process.
"Beyond a shadow of a doubt" has been pressed upon me every time I've served on a jury. S**tt & Co. know this, and are using it to stain The Presidents name in the media...the longer the better. It REALLY IS all they have.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

All they have verified is that they thought there might be a deal to get Ukraine to investigate Burisma and 2016 e******n i**********e which, as it turns out, was already happening and, in fact, it also turns out that Burisma had already, way back before Biden extorted the Ukraine gov, had contacted the Obama State department to get them to stop the investigation because of Biden's son, Biden and Kerry's kids/nephew. LOLOLOL!

That is why it is important to have the whistle blower identified and testify under republican questioning.

This part isn't going away!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Gatsby wrote:

If the Senate determines that it was a "False Alarm", is not that "whistle bower" then culpable?

Abaolutely. Thus the import of "first" hand information. LOLOL!

Wonttakeitanymore

PeterS wrote:

The question begged is does it matter who called the fire department or does it matter that we put out the fire?

This is the question surrounding the whistleblower. There have been a half dozen witnesses who have verified the claims of the whistleblower so why does it matter who the whistleblower is?

What if the one calling the fire department started the fire? Now u have a real comparison!

Seth

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

What if the one calling the fire department started the fire? Now u have a real comparison!

This is the crux of the problem for the Democrats, why Schitt the Weasel is so desperate to orchestrate things so that the Republicans' access and/or time and opportunity to question certain witnesses (or not) is confined to tight parameters.

He now knows that he and his Kangaroo Kourt aren't going to have the Stalinesque set-up he foolishly anticipated. The Dems have been spoiled over the last couple or so decades by a passive Republican Party, and all of a sudden (the Trump Effect®) the GOP has grown a spine, and there will be a reckoning, the "arsonists" are going to experience the phenomenon known as accountability.

On the Congressional end, Jordan and others are going to force the Democrats to come clean on the origins of this chapter of the Witch Hunt©, who is responsible for what, and "let's take a closer look, while we're at it, at The Bidens' Ukrainian Adventure."

On the DOJ and FBI end, Barr, the IG and Co. are looking into the origins (and legal issues thereof) of the Attempted C**p D'etat, Part 1.

The Democrats have to know that this time, especially without the Obama Umbrella of Corruption® there to cover things up, they are in for a nasty time.

Accountability, good for honest, patriotic Americans, bad for Democrats.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Seth wrote:

This is the crux of the problem for the Democrats,... (show quote)

Pelosi would like nothing more than to d**g this out past the next e******n because a BIG WIN is the only faint hope she and others in Washington have of avoiding the trap set for them and T***p w*n't let her have the time!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Hug wrote:

It matters a lot when you give a false alarm.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

What if the one calling the fire department started the fire? Now u have a real comparison!

There ya go there!

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

What if the one calling the fire department started the fire? Now u have a real comparison!

And a good one, too!