Schiff Rejects GOP Rquest for 'Whistleblower' Testimony As 'Redundant and Unnecessary'
Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot, it will be shot down by the Senate if the whistleblower is not brought forward.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Of course he does. there is not one move this sch... (
show quote)
fullspinzoo wrote:
Of course he does. there is not one move this sch... (
show quote)
The anti-Trump whistleblower whose allegations against President Donald Trump sent Congress into an impeachment frenzy concealed his interactions with House Democrats from the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) and failed to disclose them, as required by the Whistle Blower law.
ICIG Michael Atkinson testified before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) that the anti-Trump complainant, whose identity has not been made public, did not inform the ICIG in his complaint that he or his team had already contacted Democratic staff working for Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the chairman of the House intelligence committee.
bmac32 wrote:
Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot, it will be shot down by the Senate if the whistleblower is not brought forward.
He will shoot down every GOP witnees. This is not about t***h, fairness or the constitution. It is just about getting Trump.
Two houses and the democrats will lose their part, Nancy will become a two time loser!
Liberty Tree wrote:
He will shoot down every GOP witnees. This is not about t***h, fairness or the constitution. It is just about getting Trump.
What could be proved that makes any difference to the things we are looking at surrounding withholding military aid?
Does it make any difference if he was a deep state trump hating obama appointee? Will that somehow exonerate Trump or help Barr when he is looked at for obstruction?
Trump withheld military aid against the wishes of congress and the state department, he aided Russian interests to a hugely treasonous degree. He chose to do something that benefitted the Ukraine's enemy Russia over Europe's and our national security interests over a political goal that means nothing. He is guilty and if the whistleblower h**es trump is doesn't mean a thing, it does not mean what he said was made up, it is proving to be true.
bmac32 wrote:
Two houses and the democrats will lose their part, Nancy will become a two time loser!
It's impossible to make accurate predictions like that, you probably said that dems wouldnt take control of the house either, didnt you?
Liberty Tree wrote:
He will shoot down every GOP witnees. This is not about t***h, fairness or the constitution. It is just about getting Trump.
So far people who could set the record straight are being told not to testify, what they have to say does not help trump. Someone who is guilty of the abuses should be gone after.
Gatsby wrote:
The anti-Trump whistleblower whose allegations against President Donald Trump sent Congress into an impeachment frenzy concealed his interactions with House Democrats from the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) and failed to disclose them, as required by the Whistle Blower law.
ICIG Michael Atkinson testified before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) that the anti-Trump complainant, whose identity has not been made public, did not inform the ICIG in his complaint that he or his team had already contacted Democratic staff working for Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the chairman of the House intelligence committee.
The anti-Trump whistleblower whose allegations aga... (
show quote)
Does it change the accuracy of the allegations? Worry about that, because actual abuses of power are what they are and the charges will stick as validated by evidence
bmac32 wrote:
Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot, it will be shot down by the Senate if the whistleblower is not brought forward.
They have to do the right thing whether the senate will or not, we will have to see if the public ends up favoring impeachment in higher numbers after hearing more evidence and seeing what it is.
As a matter of fact I did, I never expected the democrats to act like we live in Russia.
woodguru wrote:
It's impossible to make accurate predictions like that, you probably said that dems wouldnt take control of the house either, didnt you?
The house isn't doing the correct thing so the Senate will, no matter how much the democrats squeal.
woodguru wrote:
They have to do the right thing whether the senate will or not, we will have to see if the public ends up favoring impeachment in higher numbers after hearing more evidence and seeing what it is.
fullspinzoo wrote:
Of course he does. there is not one move this sch... (
show quote)
Among other things he relegates to the sole sphere of ignorance by not knowing that "redundanct" means repetition. and it would have to have been stated. The question would used a second time to whom? How silly it was probably heardà by the closed committe. I guess that I was wrong because taxpayers are not intelligent enough or important enough to understand what only they of infonate intelligence, such of those of the ilk of those on the committee understand their collusion.
bmac32 wrote:
Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot, it will be shot down by the Senate if the whistleblower is not brought forward.
That's just what the Senate said.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.