Clear understanding; in other words, hearsay.
Nov 6, 2019 17:49:37 #
Nov 6, 2019 18:32:24 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-release-transcript-of-diplomat-bill-taylors-testimony-to-impeachment-panel
So you are accusing Fox News of peddling hearsay? Explain how someone who was involved in the first person is guilty of a hearsay statement.
Nov 6, 2019 18:57:46 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
PeterS wrote:
So you are accusing Fox News of peddling hearsay? Explain how someone who was involved in the first person is guilty of a hearsay statement.
LOL! What a dopey response! LOLOL!
Uh, no Peter. I am not accusing Fox of peddling hearsay. But Fox IS reporting that Taylor's testimony amounts to nothing but hearsay. Having a "clear understanding" is NOT the same as actually being told something else, he'd have said that is what I was told. It means Taylor did NOT hear it but rather, assumed a meaning which in his mind amounted to clear understanding, which it obviously wasn't.
Nov 6, 2019 20:14:05 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-release-transcript-of-diplomat-bill-taylors-testimony-to-impeachment-panel
It has all been hearsay and presumption.
Nov 6, 2019 21:08:02 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Liberty Tree wrote:
It has all been hearsay and presumption.
Literally, every bit!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.