One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Socialist Canada is Euthanizing Patients So It Can Harvest Their Organs
Nov 5, 2019 07:43:28   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Canada is Euthanizing Patients So It Can Harvest Their Organs

There is a startling statistic tucked away in Ontario’s September quarter euthanasia statistics. A total of 519 people were euthanized from July 1 to September 30.
Nothing too surprising.

But of the total euthanized, it appears, from government’s sketchy summary, 30 donated organs. In other words, somehow the euthanizing doctor and the t***splant surgeons coordinated their efforts so that these people could give their organs to others. The time period is unclear.

Presumably, the donation was not the cause of death, as this is illegal under Canada’s euthanasia legislation. But there is pressure from doctors to change this. A year ago two Ontario physicians and Robert Truog, a bioethicist from Harvard Medical School, published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine listing all the advantages of “organ donor euthanasia”.



https://www.lifenews.com/2019/11/01/canada-is-euthanizing-patients-so-it-can-harvest-their-organs/

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 07:56:57   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
MR Mister wrote:
Canada is Euthanizing Patients So It Can Harvest Their Organs

There is a startling statistic tucked away in Ontario’s September quarter euthanasia statistics. A total of 519 people were euthanized from July 1 to September 30.
Nothing too surprising.

But of the total euthanized, it appears, from government’s sketchy summary, 30 donated organs. In other words, somehow the euthanizing doctor and the t***splant surgeons coordinated their efforts so that these people could give their organs to others. The time period is unclear.

Presumably, the donation was not the cause of death, as this is illegal under Canada’s euthanasia legislation. But there is pressure from doctors to change this. A year ago two Ontario physicians and Robert Truog, a bioethicist from Harvard Medical School, published an article in the New England Journal of Medicine listing all the advantages of “organ donor euthanasia”.



https://www.lifenews.com/2019/11/01/canada-is-euthanizing-patients-so-it-can-harvest-their-organs/
Canada is Euthanizing Patients So It Can Harvest T... (show quote)


Individuals choose the time to end their lives and make donations of their organs to help the living...And you call this wrong?

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 08:29:10   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Individuals choose the time to end their lives and make donations of their organs to help the living...And you call this wrong?


Individuals that are sick can not choose anything. I guess you have been indoctrinate into Chinese logic.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2019 08:31:13   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
MR Mister wrote:
Individuals that are sick can not choose anything. I guess you have been indoctrinate into Chinese logic.


No... But I have family members who have discussed it and want it if it comes down to it...

Euthanasia is illegal in China

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 08:34:12   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
No... But I have family members who have discussed it and want it if it comes down to it...

Euthanasia is illegal in China


I find that very hard to believe!

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 08:36:59   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
MR Mister wrote:
I find that very hard to believe!


Google it...

Honestly... It's true...

Watched my friend's grandmother die of intestinal cancer... Horrid pain... No chance of surviving it...

Her son asked for her to be euthanized and the doctors refused... Totally against the law...

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 09:42:17   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Individuals choose the time to end their lives and make donations of their organs to help the living...And you call this wrong?

telling the t***h about a subject takes away from the sensationalism that attracts the zealot.

Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2019 09:43:52   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
MR Mister wrote:
Individuals that are sick can not choose anything. I guess you have been indoctrinate into Chinese logic.


Many people have living wills that specificaly state that their organs will be donated to people at the time of the donors death. Some even have wills that state that when death is minutes away they can be put in a state of suspended animation while the pr********ns are made.As long as it is the patients choice made while the patient was still lucid it is not illegal and should be left to the patients decision.

Reply
Nov 5, 2019 10:04:19   #
Rose42
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
telling the t***h about a subject takes away from the sensationalism that attracts the zealot.


Euthanizing someone is not the way to go. That is k*****g and opens up another can of worms. I have cared for very ill people and as a Christian I never would have done it. And they would never have asked me to.

Withholding treatment on request via a living will is something else.

Reply
Nov 6, 2019 11:00:41   #
F.D.R.
 
I have no problem with voluntary euthanasia. I've had a living will for about 40 years now. Been trying to figure out how to use my own parts to keep going. Hmmm, maybe the answer is to get a 3D printer and make spares?

Reply
Nov 6, 2019 11:02:18   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Individuals choose the time to end their lives and make donations of their organs to help the living...And you call this wrong?


Unquestionably wrong to intentionally end one's life. It is not a sign of strength; it is a sign of weakness. Prior to the degradation of the sanctity of human life most folks knew it was wrong. It was also wrong for physicians to "assist" a patient to die and there were very specific laws to prohibit it. A physician took an oath to "do no harm." The Hippocratic Oath became the Hypocritical Oath with the advent of legal a******ns and physician assisted suicide. I never discount the sanctity of God given free will, yet I can personally testify that just because we have free will doesn't mean we don't abuse it and use it to our detriment. None of us want to suffer.

Canukus, in reviewing my comment it dawns on me that you asked a simple question such as "what time is it." Instead of telling you it is 11:00 AM, I might have tried to build you a watch. I tend to get a bit wordy at times. 😇

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2019 15:11:52   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
F.D.R. wrote:
I have no problem with voluntary euthanasia. I've had a living will for about 40 years now. Been trying to figure out how to use my own parts to keep going. Hmmm, maybe the answer is to get a 3D printer and make spares?


If only that were feasible.

Reply
Nov 6, 2019 17:08:16   #
Big Kahuna
 
MR Mister wrote:
Individuals that are sick can not choose anything. I guess you have been indoctrinate into Chinese logic.


Canuckus does not realize that one should not sign any papers requesting the donation of one's organs. Your life could end very prematurely. As one working in the medical profession I have seen Docs hurry up the life of a patient to reap the windfall of organ donation. It happens more often than you realize!! Wake up guys, not all medical personnel are ethical.

Reply
Nov 6, 2019 21:13:03   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
padremike wrote:
Unquestionably wrong to intentionally end one's life. It is not a sign of strength; it is a sign of weakness. Prior to the degradation of the sanctity of human life most folks knew it was wrong. It was also wrong for physicians to "assist" a patient to die and there were very specific laws to prohibit it. A physician took an oath to "do no harm." The Hippocratic Oath became the Hypocritical Oath with the advent of legal a******ns and physician assisted suicide. I never discount the sanctity of God given free will, yet I can personally testify that just because we have free will doesn't mean we don't abuse it and use it to our detriment. None of us want to suffer.

Canukus, in reviewing my comment it dawns on me that you asked a simple question such as "what time is it." Instead of telling you it is 11:00 AM, I might have tried to build you a watch. I tend to get a bit wordy at times. 😇
Unquestionably wrong to intentionally end one's li... (show quote)


It is a hell of a watch Padre

Good points there... Will certainly ponder them

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.