"Unbiased" non-whistleblower: 'Eric Ciaramella is apparently the name of the secret, shy, elusive whistleblower on whose word we are supposed to oust an elected president of the United...

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

'Eric Ciaramella is apparently the name of the secret, shy, elusive whistleblower on whose word we are supposed to oust an elected president of the United States — and preempt the next e******n by doing so.

His background: A Democratic hack close to anti-Trump resistance mastermind John Brennan. He’s about as unbiased and nonpartisan as Joe Biden himself."

From Dick Morris Reports.

This guy was fired as a leaker from the White House and was taken back by the CIA. He worked for Biden and Shifty Schiff.

Get your popcorn. This is gonna be fun.

Doctor Dave Loc: Madisonville, Tx.

Excellent observation and I have stocked up on popcorn.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

amadjuster wrote:

'Eric Ciaramella is apparently the name of the sec... (show quote)

So, was this whistle blower even in the White House during the time in question regarding his "whistle blowing?"

http://thefederalist.com/2019/10/30/anti-trump-whistleblower-worked-with-dnc-operative-who-sought-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-officials/

Carol Kelly

Doctor Dave wrote:

Excellent observation and I have stocked up on popcorn.

I need a new batch. This one is stale. I keep hoping “the game is on”.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, was this whistle blower even in the White House during the time in question regarding his "whistle blowing?"

http://thefederalist.com/2019/10/30/anti-trump-whistleblower-worked-with-dnc-operative-who-sought-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-officials/

Nope. Someone called him about it. He was never present, hence the term "non-whistleblower".

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

amadjuster wrote:

Nope. Someone called him about it. He was never present, hence the term "non-whistleblower".

Someone; Schiff! LOL!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

amadjuster wrote:

'Eric Ciaramella is apparently the name of the sec... (show quote)

An estranged wife going through divorce proceedings tells police about soon-to-be-ex husbands kiddie porn, police search and find kiddie porn.......................you're suggesting that the husband must be declared innocent, because wife was biased.

Only those whistleblower items VERIFIED by multiple OTHER sources, is considered evidence, i.e., not hearsay.

Liberty Tree

lpnmajor wrote:

An estranged wife going through divorce proceedings tells police about soon-to-be-ex husbands kiddie porn, police search and find kiddie porn.......................you're suggesting that the husband must be declared innocent, because wife was biased.

Only those whistleblower items VERIFIED by multiple OTHER sources, is considered evidence, i.e., not hearsay.

Not to congressional Democrats. They practice guilt by accusation.

Carol Kelly

Liberty Tree wrote:

Not to congressional Democrats. They practice guilt by accusation.

Amen.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

lpnmajor wrote:

An estranged wife going through divorce proceedings tells police about soon-to-be-ex husbands kiddie porn, police search and find kiddie porn.......................you're suggesting that the husband must be declared innocent, because wife was biased.

Only those whistleblower items VERIFIED by multiple OTHER sources, is considered evidence, i.e., not hearsay.

"Shake it oh baby, TWIST and SHOUT"

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

An estranged wife going through divorce proceedings tells police about soon-to-be-ex husbands kiddie porn, police search and find kiddie porn.......................you're suggesting that the husband must be declared innocent, because wife was biased.

Only those whistleblower items VERIFIED by multiple OTHER sources, is considered evidence, i.e., not hearsay.

When we get to read the testimony of the witnesses we will see what the repugs have been telling us; they are not being credible nor corroborating.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, was this whistle blower even in the White House during the time in question regarding his "whistle blowing?"

http://thefederalist.com/2019/10/30/anti-trump-whistleblower-worked-with-dnc-operative-who-sought-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-officials/

No, is that his real name?

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

No, is that his real name?

That’s the word. Nobody’s denied it.

bggamers Loc: georgia

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, was this whistle blower even in the White House during the time in question regarding his "whistle blowing?"

http://thefederalist.com/2019/10/30/anti-trump-whistleblower-worked-with-dnc-operative-who-sought-dirt-on-trump-from-ukrainian-officials/

He's giving 2nd and 3rd person info is how I understand which wasn't admissible till 3 or 4 months ago they changed the rules how nice