nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Read the opening statement of the following witness:

Anderson . . . . , who . . . worked under previous key witness Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, are scheduled to appear Wednesday before the House Oversight, Intelligence and Foreign Affairs committees.

Pay particular attention to what she calls "deliverables" which were expected from the new Ukraine president, from the bottom of page two and the beginning of page three.

It has been suggested that these "deliverables" are/is "dirt" on Biden. It would not appear to be the case.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/30/trump-impeachment-inquiry-opening-statements-croft-anderson/4095480002/

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Here is Croft's opening statement; Note the difference, particularly the absence of the three "deliverables."

http://www.npr.org/2019/10/30/774544638/read-ukraine-specialist-catherine-crofts-written-testimony-in-impeachment-inquir

Actually, the NPR article has both.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Had a mix up in the names. The deliverables I am referring to are in Croft's statement.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Which is still an admission of quid pro quo

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

True, but not quid pro quo for "dirt" on a political opponent. Quid pro quo isn't, in and of itself, a problem when dealing with other countries. Your l*****t media-sites have so over stated the notion that you followers of their diatribe now thing the quid pro quo is illegal. It is not.