Obama judge tells Trump administration to release Grand Jury testimony to Judiciary Committee
Oct 26, 2019 12:19:36 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Isn't Grand Jury supposed to be secret ??,,, WH vowed to appeal this horrible decision!!!!!? 
Oct 26, 2019 12:43:50 #
proud republican wrote:
Isn't Grand Jury supposed to be secret ??,,,... (show quote)
================
The Obama Deep State Judge?
The Mueller Grand Jury decision is supposed to be classified.
Oct 26, 2019 13:00:30 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Radiance3 wrote:
================
The Obama Deep State Judge?
The Mueller Grand Jury decision is supposed to be classified.
The Obama Deep State Judge?
The Mueller Grand Jury decision is supposed to be classified.
My point exactly!!!!
Oct 26, 2019 13:10:16 #
proud republican wrote:
Isn't Grand Jury supposed to be secret ??,,,... (show quote)
The AG got it why not congress
Oct 26, 2019 13:26:56 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Lonewolf wrote:
The AG got it why not congress
What does Russia Investigation has to do with Ukraine????
Oct 26, 2019 13:44:17 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Lonewolf wrote:
The AG got it why not congress
You guys should worry about investigation into investigators that gone criminal now!!!!!!!! That's what you should really worry about!!!
Oct 26, 2019 15:58:07 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
proud republican wrote:
Isn't Grand Jury supposed to be secret ??,,,... (show quote)
He should only go to Trump Judges. Hey, what happens to those of us that didn't v**e for either one of them, where are OUR Judges?
Oct 26, 2019 16:14:26 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
lpnmajor wrote:
He should only go to Trump Judges. Hey, what happens to those of us that didn't v**e for either one of them, where are OUR Judges?
Hmmmm,good question!!
Let me know the answer I f you get it!!Oct 26, 2019 16:30:45 #
proud republican wrote:
Isn't Grand Jury supposed to be secret ??,,,... (show quote)
Republicans need to figure out what they want, they are crying and whining about the egregious lack of t***sparency, and here they don't want t***sparency, they are fine with the way the Mueller report has been redacted in other ways besides the grand jury part. I want t***sparency and the ability to get to the bottom of this, and Trump and the DOJ still refuse to openly share the Mueller report.
You need to upgrade your fact finding process... this "Obama" judge as you say, cited standing laws and precedents. Trump attorneys have been slinging purely nonsense positions that have no legal merit or standing. So you are surprised when the expected legal rulings are made? You wouldn't be happy with anything but a judge that ignores all laws and precedents and rules in favor of Trump malarkey.
Congress needs to be able to see what Mueller did and did not do so they can proceed accordingly. Quite frankly Mueller had an extremely narrow scope so congress might need to expand into obvious areas he didn't go.
Forget the grand jury redactions, there were many other things redacted for no reason except that they would be damaging to Trump. The court found that Barr, Trump, or the DOJ incorrectly redacted names of people who didn't appear before the grand jury that there was no reason to redact. So how much else has been redacted not for a legal reason, but because it would be damaging?
The judge, in this long ruling, f**gged a couple of areas that would be of interest to the house intelligence committees, I'm sure Trump would love to have these blocked.
Oct 26, 2019 16:32:53 #
lpnmajor wrote:
He should only go to Trump Judges. Hey, what happens to those of us that didn't v**e for either one of them, where are OUR Judges?
How about the judges that cite law and precedents, and go by that regardless of who's judges they are...like this one did. Judges aren't supposed to be "for" anybody but the law.
Oct 26, 2019 16:34:15 #
proud republican wrote:
You guys should worry about investigation into investigators that gone criminal now!!!!!!!! That's what you should really worry about!!!
You should worry about the fact that no matter what is found there Trump still did what he did in the Ukraine and it will not go away. You think if some dire thing is found it will make this go away?
Oct 26, 2019 16:40:07 #
lpnmajor wrote:
Are we supposed to let a friggin judge determine the future of our nation? Screw the judges, they can kiss my red, white and blue ass.He should only go to Trump Judges. Hey, what happens to those of us that didn't v**e for either one of them, where are OUR Judges?
Oct 26, 2019 16:40:30 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
woodguru wrote:
You should worry about the fact that no matter what is found there Trump still did what he did in the Ukraine and it will not go away. You think if some dire thing is found it will make this go away?
You seem to think that asking another country to look into corruption which effected our 2016 e******n is wrong. Even though it doesn't appear to have happened, you seem to think that holding up military aid to such a country to get that stuff investigated is wrong. If the democrats attempted to collude with Ukraine in 2016 to get dirt on Trump to effect the e******n, that is illegal and does need to be investigated and, in fact, it is being, Trump just wants the new gov of Ukraine to look into it so it doesn't happen again, something the Obama admin should have done; something the CIA and FBI should have done but they didn't and so we are investigating the investigators to see why and why their connection to the democrat collusion might have been and low and behold, it's now a criminal investigation.
Since the democrats are always going to be political opponents of Trump, it is kind of hard for him to not be looking to get dirt on them. So sorry. Nothing can be done about that!
Oct 26, 2019 16:41:59 #
woodguru wrote:
What did Trump do in Ukraine? I hope you are not thinking of a quid pro quo.You should worry about the fact that no matter what is found there Trump still did what he did in the Ukraine and it will not go away. You think if some dire thing is found it will make this go away?
Oct 26, 2019 16:59:10 #
proud republican
Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
Blade_Runner wrote:
Are we supposed to let a friggin judge determine the future of our nation? Screw the judges, they can kiss my red, white and blue ass.
Mine too!!!!!😂😂😂😂😂
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.