https://thehornnews.com/top-liberals-on-air-confession-blows-dem-impeachment-push/

Video shows impeachment witnesses LYING!? (uncut footage)

October 24, 2019
by Frank Holmes, reporter

Publicly, Democratic Party leaders say that they’re closer than ever to impeaching President Donald Trump and throwing him out of office — but when the cameras shut down, they’re telling a much different story.

They admit that things are falling apart, witnesses can’t keep their stories straight and now one of them has made the mistake of confessing the whole thing on camera.

Congresswoman Jackie Speier, D-Calif., spilled the t***h.

Speier sits on the House Intelligence Committee, so she has a front row seat as her fellow Democrats conduct their one-party, Soviet-style “impeachment inquiry” behind closed doors.

“We’re hearing conflicting recall of what actually took place,” Speier said. “So I think getting more certitude in that regard is going to be helpful to us.”

To put that into plain English, the witnesses contradict one another because they either don’t remember the story the same way, or they’re lying.

You can hear Speier spilling the beans on her fellow Democrats below:

Right now, impeachment-crazed Democrats have so little confidence in the witnesses that they can’t come up with one simple story about the president’s supposed “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

“What’s going to be important to us (Democrats) as we move forward is to drill down on many of these conversations that took place,” Speier said.

The California Democrat isn’t exactly the second coming of the more moderate Tulsi Gabbard. The non-partisan website OnTheIssues.org calls her “a hardcore liberal” — so what do you think that says that even a hard l*****t is finding this whole impeachment sham hard to swallow?

Speier’s comment blows a hole in the media narrative that impeachment is a huge success, and that the Democrats have President Trump in the early stages of a nervous breakdown.

“The impeachment walls are closing in,” says “The Washington Post.”

President Trump is “shell-shocked” in a “total panic” over impeachment, according to NBC News.

To hear the F**e News media tell it, the president is practically tearing out handfuls of his hair in “rage” and “fury.”

“The noose is tightening on the Criminal-In-Chief,” said Democratic donor Rob Reiner… last November.

The story never changes: President Trump is always one step away from being thrown out of his seat. Democrats will put him in leg irons and frog march him to the federal pen.

So, every day witnesses drop a new “bombshell,” and every statement is a “game-changer.”

Democrat Congressman Lacy Clay said when Congress heard a State Department official’s statement against Donald Trump, “Jaws dropped, heads shook in disbelief.”

But Speier opened a window on the hush-hush impeachment probe… and it’s not pretty for Democrats.

We know that one of the “whistleblowers” worked with Joe Biden in the White House.

Democrat impeachment leader Adam Schiff’s staff coordinated with one of the “whistleblowers” — but they still can’t get on the same page.

Most of the time they’re not even telling their own story. “This is fourth-hand information — this isn’t first-hand, second-hand, or third-hand,” said Republican Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), one of the few GOP congressmen who has access to the testimony.

“Almost everything about the allegations that have Democrats moving toward impeachment of the President is a lie, a proven lie,” wrote conservative columnist Derek H****r at Townhall.com.

Democrats just ignore the facts, hoping the liberal media will carry water for them until the 2020 e******n.

But most Americans still don’t support impeachment, with only 46 percent on board according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Tuesday.

And even fewer people would support it if they saw Speier admit that even the Democrats believe their own trained, handpicked impeachment witnesses are lying.

Frank Holmes is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”

Such utter nonsense. Read what they said instead of listening to your section handler.

Was it Fox News? Breitbart News? Rush? The Washington Free Beacon? The American Thinker? National Review? The Blaze? PJ Media? Red State? National Interest? Who actually did would not even enter the Right Brain for consideration.

The Democrats have demonstrated honesty and t***sparency in disclosing some of the statements by whistleblowers may be tainted or even lies. Such revelations in closed chambers could have been repressed to maintain some "deep state" or 'H**e Trump" agenda--but it was not. It was announced by the committee. Hard to see a secret agenda to attack the president by Democrats. It should now be plain that this committee is working with integrity and forthrightness about their inquiry, simply looking to determine the t***h. The full story is below.

Some Democrats involved in the impeachment inquiry are beginning to suspect that certain witnesses have coordinated with each other ahead of testifying to ensure their stories do not conflict—the very outcome investigators are trying to avoid by conducting hearings behind closed doors.

Two Democratic lawmakers told The Daily Beast that, over the course of the nine witness depositions they have conducted over the last several weeks, there have been suggestions that certain witnesses spoke to each other about what they would say to impeachment investigators.

“We have direct evidence from our investigation that witnesses have talked to each other about their testimony,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, adding that the evidence concerns two witnesses in particular, whom he declined to name.

And Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) said, “There’s some testimony already that has suggested there has been conversation” among witnesses.

“We’re working very hard to protect the integrity of the investigation and prevent witnesses from sharing their testimony with each other,” he said. “You can only do that so much.”

House Democrats have argued that, at this early stage in the impeachment inquiry, proceedings need to happen behind closed doors so that witnesses aren’t aware of exactly what other witnesses are saying and, therefore, aren’t able to adjust their stories so that they’re all on the same page.

That witnesses might coordinate, Swalwell said, is concerning “because they would tailor [testimony] to try and help each other or manufacture alibis.”

Doing so while lying under oath, of course, is a crime—something that several Democrats believe may have been committed by at least one witness, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland. Short of that, less-than-candid testimony from witnesses threatens to undermine the investigation that Democrats are attempting to conduct, all while they get attacked relentlessly by Republicans for not holding hearings that are open to the public.