2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

Representative Radcliff Republican, one of the few members of Congress allowed to sit in and ask questions of the various witnesses straight out gives information that was going on with THE ILLEGTAL IMPEACHMENT BS has the best HONEST Answers to Martha McCallum of Fox News that has been pertaining to Pencil Neck Adam Shiffs SECRET COMMITEE which by the way will never ever get past a sitting jury let alone the Supreme Court. That's because any of this that the progressive Democrats are pushing will end up before the SCOTUS will end up being charged with conspiracy and Treason against a sitting president!
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/1bzUBX7wfqs

Smedley_buzkill

Mike, you cannot commit treason against a president, or any person. Treason is committed against a country.
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

S******n, on the other hand, is defined in Black's Law as follows:

S******N
"An i**********nary movement tending towards treason, but wanting an overt act; attempts made by meetings or speeches, or by publications, to disturb the tranquillity of the state. The distinction between “s******n” and “treason” consists in this: that though the ultimate object of s******n is a violation of the public peace, or at least such a course of measures as evidently eng****rs it. yet it does not aim at direct and open violence against the laws or the subversion of the constitution. Alis. Crim. Law, 5S0. In Scotch law. The raising commotions or disturbances in the state. It Is a revolt against legitimate authority. Ersk. Inst 4, 4, 14. In English law. S******n is the offense of publishing, verbally or otherwise, any words or document with the intention of exciting disaffection, hatred, or contempt against the sovereign, or the government and constitution of the kingdom, or either house of parliament, or the administration of justice. or of exciting his majesty’s subjects to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, the alteration of any matter in church or state, or of exciting feelings of ill will and hostility between different classes of his majesty’s subjects. Sweet. And see State v. Shepherd, 177 Mo. 205. 76 S. W. 79, 99 Am. St. Rep. 624."

There might be a case made for s******n, except that it is very unlikely to happen. Politicians realize what goes around comes around, and for those who plan on staying in congress for a while it's a problem. It would be almost impossible to prove s******n on an entire party.

Gatsby

Democrats are in full blown PANIC, over the pending FISA Gate disclosures,

Panic breeds IDIOCY, and Democrats are well down that road.

Lonewolf

You have noticed they the end of the investigation quite a while ago given to Lindsey Graham but he's not releasing it wonder why could it be it's just or more damage to Republicans that it is the Democrats.
And this has nothing to do with trump crimes

Gatsby

As always, you haven't been paying attention.

A review launched by Attorney General William Barr into the origins of the Russia investigation has expanded significantly amid concerns about whether the probe has any legal or factual basis, multiple current and former officials told NBC News.

The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 p**********l e******n, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News.


Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter.

With Barr’s approval, Durham has expanded his staff and the time frame under scrutiny, according to a law enforcement official directly familiar with the matter. And he is now looking into conduct past Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, a Trump administration official said.

Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant, and that critics should be careful.


https://americaswatchtower.com/2019/10/21/william-barr-expands-spygate-investigation-after-finding-something-significant/

woodguru

The fact that you have just said that a republican member of congress is sitting in these hearings gives credence to the fact that this crap about secret meetings is pure lies and BS. Dems control the house, they call the shots, there is a contingent of republican minority committee members, this is the way it is, and the way it was for minority dems when republicans ran the investigation shows.

You guys have had ten years to see how this works, and how powerless dems have been under endless B******i and email server hearings...

Dems were constantly crying foul as the GOP selectively released self serving classified hearing transcripts and refused to let dems respond claiming that they couldn't discuss classified material.

Stop whining and crying, you guys are pathetic. You want to start making a deal about no t***sparency I don't hear you complaining about the house still not having unredacted Mueller reports or the underlying documents.

You have no problems with GOP keeping things secret, but it isn't okay for dems to work in secrecy until they are ready to disclose their work. They are investigating, investigations are donein secrecy so that witnesses can't corroborate stories.

Big Kahuna

There surely is nothing secret about your h**e for our country and our President. That's great, please keep it up. Your hatred causes more of us to go out and get v**ers to v**e for Trump by using your vile statements against an innocent President. Just because you can't get any "wood" in the morning is no reason to trash a great President. In fact I heard you were taking Viagra and the pill got lodged in your throat. Heard your neck was stiff for 3 days!! Pass some of your goodies on to Pencil Neck Schiff, his neck might expand.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Seems like it would fit sanctuary cities. I******s are k*****g Americans with machetes, vehicles, and guns.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

such tiresome rhetoric.. same wild claims, trying to defend the most corrupt POS to ever sit in our white house..

His list of crimes is endless.. and the orange cult loves it..

Somehow they think they will get something in return for the mindless support of the crime boss..

this is his hired help.. only concern is his own orange butt..

Bill Barr is not the attorney general of the United States. He is the Roy Cohn whom The Donald has craved since become president; an attorney general who sees his duty as serving Trump.

Barr won the job by writing a memo before he knew a single fact contained in the Mueller report. Its tacit and overt promises were irresistible to Trump: As attorney general, Barr would protect this president from charges of obstruction. Barr knew then, and knows now, that he has an audience of one: Donald Trump.

Barr is the attorney general of the Trump regime, and protection of the maximum leader is his sole mission. He is a weapon, not a servant.

Democrats still haven’t figured it out; unlike most of the human refuse Trump rounded up from behind the bus station to serve in his freak show administration, Barr knows the folkways and expected behaviors of Washington. He’s twice lulled Democrats into believing that he’s a down-the-line, rational pre-Trump Republican. If he were as gibberingly stupid and patently venal as the average Trump stooge, they might spot it, but he’s plainly not, and they clearly haven’t. Barr Will Bring Down America

Barr is also openly weaponizing the Department of Justice to potentially sully the future public, private, and legal testimony of members of the DOJ, FBI, and intelligence community who have seen the damning data on Trump and his claque. The goal is to intimidate anyone who would investigate Trump’s vast portfolio of corruption and obstruction of justice, both before and after he took office. It goes far, far beyond the Russia probe; it is an investigation that by its nature aims to terrify all future witnesses and whistleblowers into silence.

By acceding to Trump’s demands for political revenge and refusing to call out the language of witch hunts, crooked cops, angry Democrats, and treasonous enemies within, Barr is sending a message to every member of the DOJ and intelligence

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Fantasy, pure fantasy, but well written. Not as good as some of your memes though.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Put treachery in treason's place. I know, it's not a crime, but when added to s******n you have quite a powerhouse.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

"His list of crimes is endless.." Ever been in a put up or shut up situation? You are now, name even one crime.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

As a 3rd generation member of a crime family, the orange one has covered his butt or paid off most of his crime. but a few surface and records are public..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

Trump has, however, been involved in far more litigation than fellow real-estate magnates; the USA Today analysis in 2016 found that Trump had been involved in legal disputes more than Edward J. DeBartolo Jr., Donald Bren, Stephen M. Ross, Sam Zell, and Larry Silverstein combined.[1]

The Trump lawsuits[5][6] have attracted criticism from Trump's opponents, who say that this is not a trait that conservatives should support.[5] James Copland, director of legal policy at the conservative-leaning Manhattan Institute, states that "Trump clearly has an affinity for filing lawsuits, partly because he owns a lot of businesses" and has sometimes used litigation as a "bullying tactic".[5]

Although Trump has said that he "never" settles legal claims, Trump and his businesses have settled with plaintiffs in at least 100 cases (mostly involving personal injury claims arising from injuries at Trump properties), with settlements ranging as high as hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars[1] and recently as high as tens of millions of dollars.[7]

Among the most well-known Trump legal cases was the Trump University litigation. Three legal actions were brought alleging fraud, one by the New York State attorney general and the others by class action plaintiffs.[8] In November 2016, Trump agreed to pay $25 million to settle the litigation.[7]