Please Answer Why This Is Acceptable: for any President? And as always to our Progressive Democrat members WHAT IS THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP COMMITED TO EVEN START THE...

2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland

for any President? And as always to our Progressive Democrat members WHAT IS THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP COMMITED TO EVEN START THE WHOLE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. It really is a rather simple question now Isn't it? Since prior to President Trump even announcing his run for the presidency everyone who was anyone wanted to be just like him and all of his success what changed? If any of you progressives have an honest bone in your bosies please Answer the previous question I asked. If it is as simple as that Clinton should have won the 2016 e******n then my question is why should she had won? Was it because it was her turn or that she was a great candidate and again it was her turn. I remember that video of Hillary Clinton arrogantly asking "WHY AM I NOT AT LEAST 50 POINTS AHEAD" WITH HER HEAD SHAKING IN ARROGANCE! Remember that? Seriously why would any politician especially with her name recognition even have to go and place an ad sowing this?
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/tuPFoDSxJ8U

woodguru

2bltap wrote:

for any President? And as always to our Progressiv... (show quote)

You would simply need to actually listen to the testimonies of what state department people are saying and you would be severely unhappy with your president, he needs to be impeached and imprisoned for the rest of his life for betraying this country and the ignorant people who believed in him.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

woodguru wrote:

You would simply need to actually listen to the testimonies of what state department people are saying and you would be severely unhappy with your president, he needs to be impeached and imprisoned for the rest of his life for betraying this country and the ignorant people who believed in him.

YES!!!!! We WANT to listen testimonies,but Schitt won't allow it!!!!! So tell your buddy Schitt to stop fooling around and open hearings to the freaking public!!!!!

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

YES!!!!! We WANT to listen testimonies,but Schitt won't allow it!!!!! So tell your buddy Schitt to stop fooling around and open hearings to the freaking public!!!!!

I listened to some very comprehensive coverage that showed word for word transcripts, simply the opening statements that were made public say it all, you can't follow them?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

woodguru wrote:

I listened to some very comprehensive coverage that showed word for word transcripts, simply the opening statements that were made public say it all, you can't follow them?

NO!!! You people are good at cherrypicking!!!!!! I want to hear everything myself!!!!!!

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

proud republican wrote:

NO!!! You people are good at cherrypicking!!!!!! I want to hear everything myself!!!!!!

Exactly...Cherrypicking...That's the term I was struggling for earlier

I want to hear for myself as well...

PeterS

2bltap wrote:

for any President? And as always to our Progressiv... (show quote)

The Russia investigation was started because Russia hacked our e******n and used the information to try to skew the e******n towards Donald J Trump. The investigation into Trump started because 19 members of his e******n staff had contacts with the Russia government and to a man, they lied about having such contacts. I mean, you have heard of the Mueller report haven't you? Based on your question, it's like Mueller didn't even exist...

And here is the question to be asked--if Hillary had won and it was discovered that 1) Russia had hacked the RNC server and was using the information gathered to try to sabotage Trump's e******n chances and 2) 19 members of Hillary's e******n staff had contacts with the Russian government and they lies about having such contacts...and just for good measure lets add 3) Hillary Clinton did everything possible to block the Republican effort to learn anything relevant.

PeterS

proud republican wrote:

YES!!!!! We WANT to listen testimonies,but Schitt won't allow it!!!!! So tell your buddy Schitt to stop fooling around and open hearings to the freaking public!!!!!

The hearings aren't being broadcast but there is generally a transcript of what was said. Here are yesterday's by Taylor. It gives, IN DETAIL, how a quid-pro-quo was used to get Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son. Such a shame. Yes indeed...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-taylor-testifies-trump-used-ukraine-aid-white-house-meeting-as-leverage-to-get-investigations

PeterS

Canuckus Deploracus wrote:

Exactly...Cherrypicking...That's the term I was struggling for earlier

I want to hear for myself as well...

In due time. If he's impeached you will even get to hear every detail...even if he farts!

Smedley_buzkill

PeterS wrote:

The hearings aren't being broadcast but there is generally a transcript of what was said. Here are yesterday's by Taylor. It gives, IN DETAIL, how a quid-pro-quo was used to get Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son. Such a shame. Yes indeed...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-taylor-testifies-trump-used-ukraine-aid-white-house-meeting-as-leverage-to-get-investigations

It is a shame. A shame that the Vice-President of the United States of America would use his position to withold a billion dollars in aid unless a country stopped investigating the company his son was milking. It is also a shame for you Democraps that your boy Bill Clinton signed a treaty that made Trump's actions legal.

PeterS

Smedley_buzk**l wrote:

It is a shame. A shame that the Vice-President of the United States of America would use his position to withhold a billion dollars in aid unless a country stopped investigating the company his son was milking. It is also a shame for you Democraps that your boy Bill Clinton signed a treaty that made Trump's actions legal.

Too bad you Republicans didn't investigate Biden when you had the chance because if what you say is true that's an impeachable offense--as Trump is finding out.

As for making Trumps actions legal don't you think it would be better if someone other than the likes of you was making the case? That would be a good job for Rudy wouldn't you say? Is he going to wait and spring it on Nasty Nancy as a form of 'gotcha?' If not that's a bit of pointless information that Trump is either too dumb to use or it doesn't apply to this case...

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

2bltap wrote:

for any President? And as always to our Progressiv... (show quote)

Where does the premise that guilt must be established BEFORE an investigation come from? It certainly isn't from the Constitution. There was ample probable cause to warrant an investigation then, just as there is now.

Lonewolf

proud republican wrote:

YES!!!!! We WANT to listen testimonies,but Schitt won't allow it!!!!! So tell your buddy Schitt to stop fooling around and open hearings to the freaking public!!!!!

Realy jim Jordan was in the hearing yesterday rep don't want to participate that way they can stand back and b****

woodguru

2bltap wrote:

WHAT IS THE CRIME OR CRIMES THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP COMMITED TO EVEN START THE WHOLE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. It really is a rather simple question now Isn't it?

Here's a super simple answer, Trump managed to surround himself with people that had dealings with Russians that put them in the eye of the FBI and CIA. Manafort, Flynn...Flynn was paid $500k from Erdogan to deliver the cleric he wanted that the US refused to extradite and turn over to him to k**l. Flynn failed to disclose lobby activities, or contacts that would have been a red f**g for security clearance purposes, that is but a tip of why Trump was under investigation...there were serious national security concerns about Trump's deals with Russians.

woodguru

lpnmajor wrote:

Where does the premise that guilt must be established BEFORE an investigation come from? It certainly isn't from the Constitution. There was ample probable cause to warrant an investigation then, just as there is now.

You don't understand that the horse pulls the cart? The whistleblower provided the red f**g to the IG IC, who found ample evidence to look into this. Trump fires those who don't go along with what he wants, he fired Yovanovitch for just that. This is how this works, reasons to look, investigate when they prove valid