30 Obama Staffers Could Soon Be Arrested After What Trump Walked In On (Page 2): Not to proglibs anyhow :sm19: :sm19:...

debeda

jim_shipley wrote:

From what I have seen punishment never happens in DC

Not to proglibs anyhow

bggamers Loc: georgia

Trooper745 wrote:

Okay, you seem to be hung up on Republican politicians being completely honest. Let's hook a lie detector up to an electric chair, and run every politician through it. Set the chair up with the lie detector, so that when the politician lies, the electric chhair delivers a lethal charge. Mix up the politicians, one republican, then one democrat, then one socialist, etc., just to be fair.

instead of a lethal charge just painful one give 20 question if they flunk then the lethal charge we need to be fair u know

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

As soon as we get a real AG the DOJ will be going after a few people involved in the Ukraine thing, including Barr for obstructing justice. A court recently ruled that Barr's DOJ had improperly redacted things from the Mueller report for false reasons as well.

NOTHING was redacted that Mueller himself didn't approve. And there has and still is a completely unredacted version available for anyone with security clearance to read. Of course there is only two lines redacted in the released version. LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stop with the fiction!

waltmoreno

Lonewolf wrote:

You do know Jeff sessions is no longer employed in the government don't you I think you might be reading something really old!

Exactly! Sessions was fired by Trump and has been replaced by Barr. Sessions was pretty much ineffective as AG, afraid to cause waves, and this after even recusing himself from anything to do with the Russian collusion investigation by Mueller which went on for over two years. I, for one, am glad he's gone.

bggamers Loc: georgia

woodguru wrote:

As soon as we get a real AG the DOJ will be going after a few people involved in the Ukraine thing, including Barr for obstructing justice. A court recently ruled that Barr's DOJ had improperly redacted things from the Mueller report for false reasons as well.

Wood really pay attention quit making stuff up

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Squiddiddler wrote:

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces while they were being questioned?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THERE HAS BEEN A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF LEAKS PLAGUING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DURING PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST 126 DAYS WHICH APPEAR TO BE EXTREMELY DISPROPORTIONATE TO WHAT PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE SUFFERED.
THE UNITED STATES SENATE ON JULY 6, 2017, PUBLISHED A REPORT ENTITLED, “STATE SECRETS: HOW AN AVALANCHE OF MEDIA LEAKS IS HARMING NATIONAL SECURITY.” IN THE REPORT, IT DETAILS THE LEAKS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS SUFFERED IN THE FIRST 126 DAYS OF EXISTENCE WITH A TOTAL OF 125 LEAKS AS SHOWN BY THE FOLLOWING GRAPH.

The report also conducted a Lexis search of stories examining The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, and The Houston Chronicle. In the same 126-day period, the Bush administration was subjected to 9 leaks, and the Obama Administration 8 leaks. The Trump Administration has been subjected to a staggering 62 leaks according to the six different aforementioned news outlets alone.
The source of these leaks has yet to be specifically identified, but the group of potential suspects has been narrowed down significantly. This group of potential leakers consists of a group of 30 Obama Administration leftovers that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions believe might be leaking information to the left-wing media.

In an effort to find out who is leaking information, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced that he is planning to give lie detector tests to everyone on the National Security Council. This means well over 100 people will be questioned and evaluated very carefully. President Trump has been briefed on this pool of suspected leakers, so the cat is out of the bag.

Jonathan Swan, from Axios.com, reported, “Sessions idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the NSC staff. Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there’s more than 100 of them), and ask them individually what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the President’s phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspect those leaks came from within the NSC and thinks that a polygraph test — at the very least — would scare them out of leaking again.”

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces whil... (show quote)

You seem nearly as desperate as trump himself...

You post a BS article about his first 126 days.. News flash, that time is long gone and your orange evil is still evil...

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

woodguru wrote:

As soon as we get a real AG the DOJ will be going after a few people involved in the Ukraine thing, including Barr for obstructing justice. A court recently ruled that Barr's DOJ had improperly redacted things from the Mueller report for false reasons as well.

If Barr has the job or appointment, the title, staff, and the paycheck, I'd have to conclude he is the real AG, just saying.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Lonewolf wrote:

You do know Jeff sessions is no longer employed in the government don't you I think you might be reading something really old!

True, but I believe he is still working behind the scenes, at no salary, for the country. It's what patriots do.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Kevyn wrote:

What you fail to realize is that hearing what you believe to be the commission of a felony and reporting it to the inspector general as you are supposed to do is not “leaking” it is a patriot following protocol and doing their job.

You left out the word "if" he/she is a patriot. It makes a BIG difference.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Kevyn wrote:

What you fail to realize is that hearing what you believe to be the commission of a felony and reporting it to the inspector general as you are supposed to do is not “leaking” it is a patriot following protocol and doing their job.

What you fail to realize is everything they say Trump is doing is an attempt to cover up what they have been doing for a couple of decades and that what you're seeing is a sting operation of massive proportions.

If you guys had an ounce of t***h on your side Trump would already have been gone.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

permafrost wrote:

You seem nearly as desperate as trump himself...

You post a BS article about his first 126 days.. News flash, that time is long gone and your orange evil is still evil...

That has to be the most meaningless, contrived piece of bad art I've ever seen.

Good job!

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

BigMike wrote:

That has to be the most meaningless, contrived piece of bad art I've ever seen.

Good job!

LOL, Thank you, It fills such a need in me to lighten the load on so many of OPP patrons...HA HA HA.

bahmer

proud republican wrote:

I hope arrests will be televised,but I won't hold my breath!!!

Amen and Amen

GmanTerry

Squiddiddler wrote:

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces while they were being questioned?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THERE HAS BEEN A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF LEAKS PLAGUING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DURING PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST 126 DAYS WHICH APPEAR TO BE EXTREMELY DISPROPORTIONATE TO WHAT PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE SUFFERED.
THE UNITED STATES SENATE ON JULY 6, 2017, PUBLISHED A REPORT ENTITLED, “STATE SECRETS: HOW AN AVALANCHE OF MEDIA LEAKS IS HARMING NATIONAL SECURITY.” IN THE REPORT, IT DETAILS THE LEAKS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS SUFFERED IN THE FIRST 126 DAYS OF EXISTENCE WITH A TOTAL OF 125 LEAKS AS SHOWN BY THE FOLLOWING GRAPH.

The report also conducted a Lexis search of stories examining The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, and The Houston Chronicle. In the same 126-day period, the Bush administration was subjected to 9 leaks, and the Obama Administration 8 leaks. The Trump Administration has been subjected to a staggering 62 leaks according to the six different aforementioned news outlets alone.
The source of these leaks has yet to be specifically identified, but the group of potential suspects has been narrowed down significantly. This group of potential leakers consists of a group of 30 Obama Administration leftovers that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions believe might be leaking information to the left-wing media.

In an effort to find out who is leaking information, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced that he is planning to give lie detector tests to everyone on the National Security Council. This means well over 100 people will be questioned and evaluated very carefully. President Trump has been briefed on this pool of suspected leakers, so the cat is out of the bag.

Jonathan Swan, from Axios.com, reported, “Sessions idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the NSC staff. Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there’s more than 100 of them), and ask them individually what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the President’s phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspect those leaks came from within the NSC and thinks that a polygraph test — at the very least — would scare them out of leaking again.”

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces whil... (show quote)

If you want to read the entire article it's at: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-07-06%20State%20Secrets%20report.pdf

Here's the graph they mention.

Semper Fi

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Squiddiddler wrote:

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces while they were being questioned?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THERE HAS BEEN A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF LEAKS PLAGUING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DURING PRESIDENT TRUMP’S FIRST 126 DAYS WHICH APPEAR TO BE EXTREMELY DISPROPORTIONATE TO WHAT PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE SUFFERED.
THE UNITED STATES SENATE ON JULY 6, 2017, PUBLISHED A REPORT ENTITLED, “STATE SECRETS: HOW AN AVALANCHE OF MEDIA LEAKS IS HARMING NATIONAL SECURITY.” IN THE REPORT, IT DETAILS THE LEAKS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS SUFFERED IN THE FIRST 126 DAYS OF EXISTENCE WITH A TOTAL OF 125 LEAKS AS SHOWN BY THE FOLLOWING GRAPH.

The report also conducted a Lexis search of stories examining The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, and The Houston Chronicle. In the same 126-day period, the Bush administration was subjected to 9 leaks, and the Obama Administration 8 leaks. The Trump Administration has been subjected to a staggering 62 leaks according to the six different aforementioned news outlets alone.
The source of these leaks has yet to be specifically identified, but the group of potential suspects has been narrowed down significantly. This group of potential leakers consists of a group of 30 Obama Administration leftovers that President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions believe might be leaking information to the left-wing media.

In an effort to find out who is leaking information, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced that he is planning to give lie detector tests to everyone on the National Security Council. This means well over 100 people will be questioned and evaluated very carefully. President Trump has been briefed on this pool of suspected leakers, so the cat is out of the bag.

Jonathan Swan, from Axios.com, reported, “Sessions idea is to do a one-time, one-issue, polygraph test of everyone on the NSC staff. Interrogators would sit down with every single NSC staffer (there’s more than 100 of them), and ask them individually what they know about the leaks of transcripts of the President’s phone calls with foreign leaders. Sessions suspect those leaks came from within the NSC and thinks that a polygraph test — at the very least — would scare them out of leaking again.”

Wouldn't it be something to watch their faces whil... (show quote)

It sure would. I'd like to see them question barry and don't say why or about what. His fingerprints have been on about everything including the UN (if you remember the UN's supposed to be the hub of all global crap by 2025). I wouldn't be surprised at all, in fact, I'm betting on him being the second whistleblower.