One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Where Is Waldo The Whistle Blower?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 19, 2019 22:16:33   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
explain it to me.. I may remember.. so off hand no but it seems familiar..


Google it. If you actually look, you'll find it revealing.

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 07:23:34   #
jSmitty45 Loc: Fl born, lived in Texas 30 yrs, now Louisiana
 
Silent Hammer wrote:
Lets see: The transcript was PUBLISHED, and the Schifties were knocked on their behinds. Pelosi has lost control of the Democrats, and went dithering off to the first bar she could. Then, Schiffty recited his own reading of the transcript and the TDS hoards began baying at the moon....again. And now, two foreign heads of state have certified officially the accuracy of the transcript, and, in questioning by MSM affiliates, have also certified that no extortion (aka "Quid pro Quo) took place nor was intended. In addition, this uh...."Whistleblower" in all reality DOESN'T EXIST. The "letter" was obviously written by attorneys and Schitt (oops, did I just correctly spell his name?) who orchestrated the whole masquerade. Just another pebble in the road to the re-e******n of President Donald J. Trump. Be patient: the ax will fall on Schitt, Pelosi, the majority of the House Intelligence (?) committee et al in due time. I like the Biblical expression, "In the fullness of time", for it summarizes the light at the end of the tunnel the Democrat Liberal/Socialists are seeing. It's a freight train coming their way at 55 mph.
Lets see: The transcript was PUBLISHED, and the S... (show quote)


Yep, and it is picking up steam!

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 08:05:14   #
Silent Hammer
 
Silent Hammer wrote:
Lets see: The transcript was PUBLISHED, and the Schifties were knocked on their behinds. Pelosi has lost control of the Democrats, and went dithering off to the first bar she could. Then, Schiffty recited his own reading of the transcript and the TDS hoards began baying at the moon....again. And now, two foreign heads of state have certified officially the accuracy of the transcript, and, in questioning by MSM affiliates, have also certified that no extortion (aka "Quid pro Quo) took place nor was intended. In addition, this uh...."Whistleblower" in all reality DOESN'T EXIST. The "letter" was obviously written by attorneys and Schitt (oops, did I just correctly spell his name?) who orchestrated the whole masquerade. Just another pebble in the road to the re-e******n of President Donald J. Trump. Be patient: the ax will fall on Schitt, Pelosi, the majority of the House Intelligence (?) committee et al in due time. I like the Biblical expression, "In the fullness of time", for it summarizes the light at the end of the tunnel the Democrat Liberal/Socialists are seeing. It's a freight train coming their way at 55 mph.
Lets see: The transcript was PUBLISHED, and the S... (show quote)


(It's actually the Trump Train!)

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2019 09:34:51   #
dennis puthuff
 
Kevyn, the proper protocal was never used by the WB'er in the first place. Schiff and complainant were not honest with the American people and the Dems have not followed the rules of impeachment. Your hatred of this president has given way to absolute nonsense and dribble. I have yet observed anything you have composed that makes any sense whatsoever! Ponder your ignorance and instability, please!

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 11:47:29   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
dennis puthuff wrote:
Kevyn, the proper protocal was never used by the WB'er in the first place. Schiff and complainant were not honest with the American people and the Dems have not followed the rules of impeachment. Your hatred of this president has given way to absolute nonsense and dribble. I have yet observed anything you have composed that makes any sense whatsoever! Ponder your ignorance and instability, please!


You are talking to the chief pigeon of the chess playing pigeons! He can only ponder the air going in and out of his head as he speaks.

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 12:12:35   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
lpnmajor wrote:
We don't need him..............................every detail of his complaint has been carefully verified.


And what planet did u say u were from????????????????? Its the opposite they have verified that nothing he said is true it doesn't match the statement

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 16:03:39   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
He is supposed to be the credible source that started the bogus impeachment inquiry. What happened to him? Did he ever exist?


They based the character on Gordon, Morell and Watnic, three ex-cia agents. Any first or second hand knowledge? Nope. Bias? Yes.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2019 16:09:04   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
He is supposed to be the credible source that started the bogus impeachment inquiry. What happened to him? Did he ever exist?

You just can't get it can you? The whistleblower did his thing, credible or not he pointed the way to get credible information. Insiders are testifying that the administration was operating outside of official channels on projects that were the definition of new corruption.

It's over, the whistleblower never needs to appear anywhere, he made a report and the report has provided more than enough.

What do you think beating up on the whistleblower is supposed to accomplish, showing he was not credible or wh**ever does not change a single thing. Republicans want to be able to say see...see, he was against Trump, so what?

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 16:09:51   #
woodguru
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
They based the character on Gordon, Morell and Watnic, three ex-cia agents. Any first or second hand knowledge? Nope. Bias? Yes.


So what if he's biased, he reported violations that have proved to be true

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 16:11:54   #
woodguru
 
bggamers wrote:
And what planet did u say u were from????????????????? Its the opposite they have verified that nothing he said is true it doesn't match the statement

Who is they, there has been no such verification...follow what Trump's boy Giuliani is in trouble for and his troubles are Trump's troubles.

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 16:22:29   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
They claimed he was the reason for starting the impeachment inquiries when they hadn't seen the complaint or even heard the phone call. So no, he never existed. Pelosi and Schiff have to be the most stupid people on the planet.

Is this what the right wing has evolved this story into?

...He turned in a report to the IC IG
...who turned it over to the acting head of intelligence...
...and the DOJ because (and this is important) he thought there were crimes that needed investigating
...The IC IG did not agree with Barr's assessment that there was nothing there
...He went to the house and told them that there was a whistleblower report they needed to see...
...that the acting head of intelligence was sitting on
...which is the point where Barr went into a coverup mode and tried to keep the house from seeing it

We now know that multiple insiders in different departments were concerned about what the white house and Giuliani was doing, including Bolton, who told other people to file a complaint. This is way bigger than the whistleblower complaint, and the origins of the WB complaint are irrelevant at this point. Republicans think if they can find something wrong with the WB it negates everything that came out since, and that is patently false, they are in a mode where they are making as much irrelevant noise as possible, otherwise known as obfuscation.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2019 16:25:38   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
They claimed he was the reason for starting the impeachment inquiries when they hadn't seen the complaint or even heard the phone call. So no, he never existed. Pelosi and Schiff have to be the most stupid people on the planet.

By the way, the impeachment inquiries were in motion before that looking into the Mueller obstruction report, the white house was obstructing those investigations which are impeachable crimes all on their own. The right is trying to make mountains out of mole hills when there were already multiple impeachable offenses that the white house was refusing to cooperate with in getting answers.

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 16:32:56   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
woodguru wrote:
You just can't get it can you? The whistleblower did his thing, credible or not he pointed the way to get credible information. Insiders are testifying that the administration was operating outside of official channels on projects that were the definition of new corruption.

It's over, the whistleblower never needs to appear anywhere, he made a report and the report has provided more than enough.

What do you think beating up on the whistleblower is supposed to accomplish, showing he was not credible or wh**ever does not change a single thing. Republicans want to be able to say see...see, he was against Trump, so what?
You just can't get it can you? The whistleblower d... (show quote)


His info was proven wrong now it's possible he may face charges along with Schiff for lying

Reply
Oct 20, 2019 17:12:24   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
bggamers wrote:
His info was proven wrong now it's possible he may face charges along with Schiff for lying


Who or what proved him wrong.. Woody is so correct on this..

do you people have any idea other then repeating what the fish wrap press has lied to you about??

we have laws in this country that WB can remain anonymous..

Do you know the difference between an Impeachment investigation and an Impeachment hearing?

Which of the many possible charges worries you the most?

trump is falling, his ashes may not be removed from office, but his last shred of respect in the world is now long gone.. as is Americas respect for a number of coming years.

It will be a lot of work and a long time coming to regain what the orange albatross has cost America.



Reply
Oct 20, 2019 19:34:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
You just can't get it can you? The whistleblower did his thing, credible or not he pointed the way to get credible information. Insiders are testifying that the administration was operating outside of official channels on projects that were the definition of new corruption.

It's over, the whistleblower never needs to appear anywhere, he made a report and the report has provided more than enough.

What do you think beating up on the whistleblower is supposed to accomplish, showing he was not credible or wh**ever does not change a single thing. Republicans want to be able to say see...see, he was against Trump, so what?
You just can't get it can you? The whistleblower d... (show quote)


The left is able to make up things like no bodies business. literally, fiction! Schiff leads the way with his parody and having claimed to have seen evidence of collusion with Russia! LOLOL! The ID of the whistle blower will blow the entire thing out of the water for the left. Some of us now know who it is. LOLOL! The fun will make your head spin and credibility will not exist! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.