Mike Pompeo’s Subordinates Are Calling His Bluff in the Impeachment Inquiry: They’re defying his orders and testifying against Trump.

Lonewolf

They’re defying his orders and testifying against Trump.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/impeachment-pompeo-george-kent-fiona-hill-testify-defy-state-department.html

EL Loc: Massachusetts

Lonewolf wrote:

They’re defying his orders and testifying against Trump.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/impeachment-pompeo-george-kent-fiona-hill-testify-defy-state-department.html

They'll just end up looking silly.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Lonewolf wrote:

They’re defying his orders and testifying against Trump.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/impeachment-pompeo-george-kent-fiona-hill-testify-defy-state-department.html

Hopefully, they're just testifying, telling the t***h, regardless of whether it is for or against Trump. Making statements such as this, re-enforces the Trump narrative that everything is just about "getting Trump".

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Lonewolf wrote:

They’re defying his orders and testifying against Trump.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/10/impeachment-pompeo-george-kent-fiona-hill-testify-defy-state-department.html

Hill was going to testify anyway so why subpoena her?

You need to listen to this: http://www.foxnews.com/media/kevin-mccarthy-schiff-trump-impeachment

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

lpnmajor wrote:

Hopefully, they're just testifying, telling the t***h, regardless of whether it is for or against Trump. Making statements such as this, re-enforces the Trump narrative that everything is just about "getting Trump".

Tell the t***h, lie, what's the difference to them? Although yes it reinforces his narrative and my question which was never answered. The non-answer was an answer in itself. The one Democrat not liberal, this was a guy I could and would talk to. We have slight disagreements, but nothing major.

woodguru

EL wrote:

They'll just end up looking silly.

You aren't paying attention to what is coming out, it's making those who are still defending Trump look silly. He is being thrown under the bus by his closest Komrades, it's what happens to guys like Trump who have no loyalties toward those who worked for him, past tense.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

You aren't paying attention to what is coming out, it's making those who are still defending Trump look silly. He is being thrown under the bus by his closest Komrades, it's what happens to guys like Trump who have no loyalties toward those who worked for him, past tense.

Volker has shown us how Schiff is lying with his selected leaks. We ALL know it.

woodguru

nwtk2007 wrote:

Volker has shown us how Schiff is lying with his selected leaks. We ALL know it.

Selective leaks? Tho GOP was laying down so much nothing there rhetoric after the hearing they decided to release the emails and texts for the public to see what was there. There is a huge difference between selected leaks and full t***sparency, when dealing with the t***h full disclosure is a winner.

You guys still aren't figuring out that there was a substantial amount of unofficial crapola going on that wasn't through official channels because it violated foreign policies?

Trump people are throwing him under the bus because they are not going to take the fall for things they didn't agree to in the first place.

Lonewolf

woodguru wrote:

Selective leaks? Tho GOP was laying down so much n... (show quote)

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

woodguru wrote:

Selective leaks? Tho GOP was laying down so much n... (show quote)

Trump people are NOT throwing him under the bus. In fact, Trump people want full open hearings so we can all hear all of what the witnesses are testifying about, not just what Schiff is leaking out.

And by the way, you are trying to employ the qo que quo, they did it first, argument to justify that which you seem to now be admitting and what the republicans are accusing Schiff of. Thank you. It is about time!

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Volker has shown us how Schiff is lying with his selected leaks. We ALL know it.

Yep, I really can't think of one who has turned on Trump. I think our lib friends would be better off naming names. It just looks like another lie this way.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

Yep, I really can't think of one who has turned on Trump. I think our lib friends would be better off naming names. It just looks like another lie this way.

It's always a lie and yet they say Trump is the big liar. LOL!

Navigator

woodguru wrote:

Selective leaks? Tho GOP was laying down so much n... (show quote)

"You guys still aren't figuring out that there was a substantial amount of unofficial crapola going on that wasn't through official channels because it violated foreign policies?" See if you can digest this: Trump is the President, the final authority on foreign policies under his administration. If the President wants to use people outside the state department or other "official channels" (as every other President in our history has done), he has the full authority to do so and to insinuate that so doing is somehow criminal is ignorant.