When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL
Bcon wrote:
When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL
When listening to people, one way that I separate ... (
show quote)
That sums things up perfectly. When the GOP assumes their majority in the House in January 2021, it would be well within the realm of fair and just if they kicked Adam Schitt's lying weasel a** out of the House and recommended that DOJ initiate criminal charges against the mutt.
Bcon wrote:
When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL
When listening to people, one way that I separate ... (
show quote)
Good piece, thanks for sharing.
And dont forget, even failing impeachment, they want to cast a shadow to try to avoid the President from being reelected
Bcon wrote:
When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL
When listening to people, one way that I separate ... (
show quote)
Trump has been intent on destroying himself from day one.................and not a single Republican of note has tried to help him avoid that fate.
Bcon wrote:
When listening to people, one way that I separate t***h from fiction is, if it is consis- tent and makes sense then it is probably true. If it does not, then red f**gs go up. Let me give you an example.
Recently, a whistleblower filed a complaint related to a conversation that President Trump had with President Zelensky of The Ukraine. Nancy Pelosi without having read the com- plaint or hearing testimony from the whistle- blower immediately opened an impeachment investigation. Why would she do that? It made no sense; it reminded of a line in Alice in Won- derland, “Verdict first, then trial!” Even the liberal press questioned her motives.
More evidence then came out showing that the informer was a partisan Democrat. Instead of following federal regulations that required him to report his complaint directly to the I.G., he instead went to Rep. Schiff’s office. There they discussed his second-hand information and then directed him to a law- yer who had worked for Senators Schumer and Clinton. That lawyer wrote up the complaint in the most incriminating manner possible and then sent him to the I.G. Once there, he never shared with them that he had any discussions with Schiff’s office or the Schumer-Clinton lawyer.
Schiff had this information for six weeks before it went public; he intentionally hid it from the Republicans on his committee, from the press and from the American people. Reporters questioned him numerous times asking if he or his staff had had any contact with the whistleblower, and his response was always, “We have not spoken to or had any contact with him or her.” Those statements were an outright lie. Although I do know one person he did choose to share his informa- tion with, Nancy Pelosi; it is clearly the missing link that makes sense in her rush for impeachment.
President Trump immediately declassified
the transcript and made it public. Schiff then shared it in a committee hearing, but instead of reading the actual transcript he delivered a fabrication filled with lies that had nothing to do with the call. This is the same man who for over two years falsely proclaimed almost daily on CNN and MSNBC that he had seen un- equivocal evidence that the 2016 Trump cam- paign colluded, cooperated and coordinated with Russia. As it turned out, Robert Mueller’s very partisan group of Democratic lawyers found absolutely no evidence of collusion.
Pelosi has said this process will be fair;
it is not. She refuses to allow a House v**e
on impeachment, this move allows only the Democrats to have subpoena power and the ability to question those brought before the committees. It effectively gives the Demo- crats the power of prosecution but denies the Republicans their defense. This would never be allowed in any prosecution in the United States, but it is the new standard for the kan- garoo court of Pelosi.
Since getting Schiff’s information, Demo- crats have orchestrated this phone-call contro- versy with lies and deceptions and once again their goal is to remove a sitting president and overturn an e******n of the American people. Their investigations have been continuous for three years. They are so consumed by h**e that they can do nothing other than seek the destruction of this man. It needs to stop!
President Trump’s policies have given America a GDP of over 3% for four quar- ters, an unemployment rate of 3.5%, energy independence, 5 million new jobs, tax cuts, regulation cuts, support of the free market, securing of our boarder, and the rebuild-
ing of our military. These radically Left Democrats are adamantly against all of his policies. Does anyone doubt they are actively seeking to destroy him?
ROBERT A. RIDAL
When listening to people, one way that I separate ... (
show quote)
In 2009, the day after Obama's inauguration, Mitch McTurtle ordered all Republicans to henceforth do everything they can to destroy Obama, cost what it may.
What goes around, comes around.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
