Seems I've heard this verse before!
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!
She is a dumb broad isn’t she and it appears she’s over her head letting Schiff take the lead. He needs to be taken down.
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.
10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.
Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.
I'll bet you can just list them here, can't you? With proof. Without proof, I could just as easily accuse you of the same thing and it would be just as valid.
Auntie Dee wrote:
Seems I've heard this verse before!
She's starting to look like the crypt keeper.
Auntie Dee wrote:
10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.
Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!
You were being a bit too solicitous, Aunti Dee.
- 10 possible counts of obstruction, which, if there was any validity to any of them, would be what the left would be investigating instead of a phone-call to Ukraine.
- Alleged extortion, juxtaposed to in-your-face, on tape, actual evidence of extortion by Creepy Uncle Joe
- Racketeering or the Emoluments Clause? Compared to the Clinton Foundations taking in hundreds of millions from foreign countries...
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/hillary_and_the_emoluments_clause_of_the_constitution.html"Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.” Official IRS forms do not list cigar or dry-cleaning expenses as a specific line item. The Clinton Foundation may well be saving lives, but it seems odd that the costs of so many life-saving activities would be classified by the organization itself as just random, miscellaneous expenses."
Just sayin'
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
I'll bet you can just list them here, can't you? With proof. Without proof, I could just as easily accuse you of the same thing and it would be just as valid.
I haven't seen any of them. If he means trying to get a country to look into something for him. Zelensky ran on a get rid of corruption ticket and believe me Burisma is only the tip of the iceberg. But then, explain Tony Blair and Slick Willy, yes it is documented. Or the treaty of cooperation between the US and Ukraine Willy signed.
Auntie Dee wrote:
10 possible counts of obstruction; alleged extortion, racketeering??, accusations of violations of emoluments clause.
Really Kevy when are you going to learn what is & isn't reality? Stating something just doesn't make it FACT! Something you Dem's just do not seem to understand is that you have to have proof and a legal process called a conviction! Accusations just don't do it anymore, we are onto your games!
and what makes you right and Kevyn wrong ?
Kevyn wrote:
Ten counts of obstruction of justice, extortion of a foreign government, racketeering, and blatant violations of the emoluments clause are a damn good start. Now it is time to start digging into his finances.
None of which have any factual backup.
Unless we take the word of Shifty Schiff
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.