Trump thinks Americans are the stupidest people that walk the earth
Oct 11, 2019 17:11:47 #
Jakebrake wrote:
Cool....Then we do indeed have a wager...right?
you are correct 50 bucks trumps impeached and will not win in 2020 of coarse the senate will bury it and never convict
Oct 11, 2019 17:13:25 #
Oct 11, 2019 17:18:56 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
Lonewolf wrote:
you are correct 50 bucks trumps impeached and will not win in 2020 of coarse the senate will bury it and never convict
Are you saying "Impeached" as Clinton was, or are you saying "Impeached and removed from office"?
A big difference between the two because Impeachment will strengthen his chances of being re-elected.
Oct 11, 2019 17:20:54 #
dtucker300 wrote:
Are you saying "Impeached" as Clinton was, or are you saying "Impeached and removed from office"?
A big difference between the two.
A big difference between the two.
impeached like Clinton was we don't want him out of office then you guys might find someone who could win in 2020
Oct 11, 2019 17:29:29 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
Lonewolf wrote:
impeached like Clinton was we don't want him out of office then you guys might find someone who could win in 2020
You got that right. There sure aren't any Democrat candidates worth their salt, so Trump may still win. Nothing is a lock at this time, regardless of what the extremes may think.
Oct 11, 2019 23:50:12 #
Lonewolf wrote:
impeached like Clinton was we don't want him out of office then you guys might find someone who could win in 2020
They aren't impeaching him.
Oct 12, 2019 00:50:06 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
BigMike wrote:
They aren't impeaching him.
They certainly aren't convicting him. But there are still a lot of RINOs who don't want to run on the Trump ticket. The Democrats are in an even worse predicament. If Pelosi was half as smart as she thinks Trump is stupid, she would rid her party of The Squad. Omar, Tlaib, Waters, Schiff, Nadler, and so many more will bring the party down. They've turned out to be even better candidates for helping the Republicans than Obama and Hillary.
Oct 12, 2019 01:06:20 #
dtucker300 wrote:
They certainly aren't convicting him. But there are still a lot of RINOs who don't want to run on the Trump ticket. The Democrats are in an even worse predicament. If Pelosi was half as smart as she thinks Trump is stupid, she would rid her party of The Squad. Omar, Tlaib, Waters, Schiff, Nadler, and so many more will bring the party down. They've turned out to be even better candidates for helping the Republicans than Obama and Hillary.
If they don't the fruitcake base k**ls them.
If they do their fence-sitters stay home they, lose the e******n and maybe fail in the impeachment.
If they're successful Trump gets to call a lot of witnesses under oath.
Oct 12, 2019 13:56:21 #
dtucker300 wrote:
They certainly aren't convicting him. But there are still a lot of RINOs who don't want to run on the Trump ticket. The Democrats are in an even worse predicament. If Pelosi was half as smart as she thinks Trump is stupid, she would rid her party of The Squad. Omar, Tlaib, Waters, Schiff, Nadler, and so many more will bring the party down. They've turned out to be even better candidates for helping the Republicans than Obama and Hillary.
Sooo true!
Oct 12, 2019 14:41:01 #
dtucker300
Loc: Vista, CA
So many on OPP have a blind hatred for Trump. I have stated several times that Trump has abided by court decisions far more than Obama ever did. If Obama didn't like something, he would issue Executive Orders to make himself the legislator.
The following decisions are not the final answer as there will be appeals. But Trump have proven time and time again that he has respect for the rule of law rather than making law as he goes along.
Federal judges rule against Trump in 3 cases on executive powers
David KnowlesEditor,Yahoo News•October 11, 2019
President Trump suffered defeats in three major court rulings Friday that address the limits of his executive authority.
The rulings come as the White House has sought to thwart House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into the president’s request that the Ukrainian government investigate one of his political rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden. While Friday’s decisions stem from cases unrelated to the Ukraine matter, they each address what plaintiffs claimed was a president overstepping his constitutional bounds.
Business records
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a lower court decision, ruling that Congress can see eight years of Trump’s business records held by his accounting firm, Mazars USA. The House Oversight Committee had subpoenaed the records after the president’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified that Trump had exaggerated his wealth when applying for loans, which is a crime.
“Contrary to the President’s arguments, the Committee possesses authority under both House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply,” Judges David S. Tatel and Patricia A. Millett wrote. The judges went on to call the congressional subpoena for Trump’s records “a valid exercise of the legislative authority.”
Trump will likely appeal again, either to the full D.C. Circuit Court or to the Supreme Court.
Denying green cards and visas to low-income immigrants
U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels of the Southern District of New York issued a preliminary nationwide injunction blocking a Trump administration rule set to take effect next week that would have made it easier to deny green cards and visas to immigrants who cannot show they will not require public assistance. After the administration announced the new rule, nearly a dozen states filed suit to block it.
“The Rule is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification,” Daniels wrote in his scathing opinion. “It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upwards mobility.”
Later on Friday afternoon, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton issued a preliminary injunction in a case announced by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
The president’s legal team is expected to appeal the decisions.
Wall funding
U.S. District Court Judge David Briones, in the Western District of Texas, ruled that the declaration of a national emergency under which Trump diverted funds from other agencies to construct a Mexico border wall was unlawful.
The decision found that the law “expressly forbids” a president from using money allocated by Congress for any other purpose than was originally set forth. The county of El Paso and the Border Network for Human Rights brought the lawsuit, contending that Trump had broken the law by diverting Defense Department funds to build the wall.
The judge did not specify what should now happen, but has asked the county and the Border Network to file a proposed preliminary injunction within 10 days. In the meantime, construction of the border wall can continue, but that could come to a halt once the terms of the injunction are specified.
An appeal is expected from the Trump administration.
The following decisions are not the final answer as there will be appeals. But Trump have proven time and time again that he has respect for the rule of law rather than making law as he goes along.
Federal judges rule against Trump in 3 cases on executive powers
David KnowlesEditor,Yahoo News•October 11, 2019
President Trump suffered defeats in three major court rulings Friday that address the limits of his executive authority.
The rulings come as the White House has sought to thwart House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into the president’s request that the Ukrainian government investigate one of his political rivals, former Vice President Joe Biden. While Friday’s decisions stem from cases unrelated to the Ukraine matter, they each address what plaintiffs claimed was a president overstepping his constitutional bounds.
Business records
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld a lower court decision, ruling that Congress can see eight years of Trump’s business records held by his accounting firm, Mazars USA. The House Oversight Committee had subpoenaed the records after the president’s former lawyer Michael Cohen testified that Trump had exaggerated his wealth when applying for loans, which is a crime.
“Contrary to the President’s arguments, the Committee possesses authority under both House Rules and the Constitution to issue the subpoena, and Mazars must comply,” Judges David S. Tatel and Patricia A. Millett wrote. The judges went on to call the congressional subpoena for Trump’s records “a valid exercise of the legislative authority.”
Trump will likely appeal again, either to the full D.C. Circuit Court or to the Supreme Court.
Denying green cards and visas to low-income immigrants
U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels of the Southern District of New York issued a preliminary nationwide injunction blocking a Trump administration rule set to take effect next week that would have made it easier to deny green cards and visas to immigrants who cannot show they will not require public assistance. After the administration announced the new rule, nearly a dozen states filed suit to block it.
“The Rule is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification,” Daniels wrote in his scathing opinion. “It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upwards mobility.”
Later on Friday afternoon, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton issued a preliminary injunction in a case announced by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
The president’s legal team is expected to appeal the decisions.
Wall funding
U.S. District Court Judge David Briones, in the Western District of Texas, ruled that the declaration of a national emergency under which Trump diverted funds from other agencies to construct a Mexico border wall was unlawful.
The decision found that the law “expressly forbids” a president from using money allocated by Congress for any other purpose than was originally set forth. The county of El Paso and the Border Network for Human Rights brought the lawsuit, contending that Trump had broken the law by diverting Defense Department funds to build the wall.
The judge did not specify what should now happen, but has asked the county and the Border Network to file a proposed preliminary injunction within 10 days. In the meantime, construction of the border wall can continue, but that could come to a halt once the terms of the injunction are specified.
An appeal is expected from the Trump administration.
Oct 12, 2019 15:25:48 #
dtucker300 wrote:
So many on OPP have a blind hatred for Trump. I h... (show quote)
Most excellent post~
Oct 13, 2019 08:10:43 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
JediKnight wrote:
Louie: I don't know what you're trying to say....a... (show quote)
"either you are for the Lord and righteousness, or you are for Trump and the deliberate wrong things he does and unrighteousness."
LOL! So you think the lord/God supports a******n, homosexuality, g****r changes/boys in a girls restroom, boys pretending to be girls competing with girls/open borders promoting the influx of drugs/I*****L i*********n/endless wars/free loaders/etc??
Oct 13, 2019 08:17:45 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
"either you are for the Lord and righteousness, or you are for Trump and the deliberate wrong things he does and unrighteousness."
LOL! So you think the lord/God supports a******n, homosexuality, g****r changes/boys in a girls restroom, boys pretending to be girls competing with girls/open borders promoting the influx of drugs/I*****L i*********n/endless wars/free loaders/etc??
LOL! So you think the lord/God supports a******n, homosexuality, g****r changes/boys in a girls restroom, boys pretending to be girls competing with girls/open borders promoting the influx of drugs/I*****L i*********n/endless wars/free loaders/etc??
Jedi is one screwed up and misguided "Christian".
Oct 13, 2019 11:14:16 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Jedi is one screwed up and misguided "Christian".
Yep, and a hypocrite too~
Oct 13, 2019 13:09:16 #
dtucker300 wrote:
They certainly aren't convicting him. But there are still a lot of RINOs who don't want to run on the Trump ticket. The Democrats are in an even worse predicament. If Pelosi was half as smart as she thinks Trump is stupid, she would rid her party of The Squad. Omar, Tlaib, Waters, Schiff, Nadler, and so many more will bring the party down. They've turned out to be even better candidates for helping the Republicans than Obama and Hillary.
They can't impeach him without a v**e. They'll try and it and they possibly could do it but that isn't what they're doing now. They're trying to do everything but now, it appears to me.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.