Schiff must revise himself.
eagleye13 wrote:
There have been many posts regarding the corruptoin of those in the Deep State. Brennan, Comey and crew being covered.
Bananacuda chooses to ignore the past.
nwtk2007 wrote:
Bananacuda chooses to ignore the past.
Never gives any credence to anything that does not fit its ideology. One of the most intolerant posters on OPP.
JFlorio wrote:
Never gives any credence to anything that does not fit its ideology. One of the most intolerant posters on OPP.
Bananaruda; "Never gives any credence to anything that does not fit its ideology. One of the most intolerant posters on OPP."
Yep!
Deep State, Shadow Government
Ex CIA agent explains how to delete the elite!
https://youtu.be/WLr8ZvgURg0 Ex CIA Agent Tells All In Powerful Speech About Elite
Bloggers, not informers, are key
if you bloggers self-organize and attach yourself like l***hes to specific issues, corporations, organizations, challenges, wh**ever, you will be the intelligence minute men of this century.
The power is in your hands. There are not enough guns to k**l us all and Halliburton can’t build the jails fast enough to keep us all down. Bloggers, as Linux is organized, where you grab onto an issue or something, where you are part of a structured citizen journalism blogging thing, that lets no evildoing go unnoticed, that rules.
So I think we are at a turning point. I think we are at the very beginning of a historic tidal shift in power restoring the constitution
.so you guys are the lifeboat.
Robert D. Steele, Ex CIA
http://youtu.be/WLr8ZvgURg0
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Where did you get that from?
I've watched different sources state it on TV and YouTube.
Tug484 wrote:
I've watched different sources state it on TV and YouTube.
Ok, well it's pure BS, no offense. There are rules to congress which they have to abide by.
JFlorio wrote:
Never gives any credence to anything that does not fit its ideology. One of the most intolerant posters on OPP.
Aw gee, I'm hurt, I really am, I thought we were friends.
Tell me which one of you guys ever give credence to someone on the left? Yeah right, like that ever happens.
nwtk2007 wrote:
Bananacuda chooses to ignore the past.
I don't ignore the past, I just don't dwell in it like the right does.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
Aw gee, I'm hurt, I really am, I thought we were friends.
Tell me which one of you guys ever give credence to someone on the left? Yeah right, like that ever happens.
Actually I have agreed with those on the left when they produce proof.
JFlorio wrote:
They are not allowing the Republicans to not only question witness's but not even know if the witness's are coming forward. This is a rush to Impeachment because they know their accusations don't hold up to scrutiny. They have weaponized the intelligence committee so the the American people can't see what's going on. In the past Impeachment was handled by 1 committee. Now it's 3. All secret. Remember how this started. The Clinton campaign started this entire mess by trying to get dirt from the Ukrainians and Russians on Trump. This is exactly what they're accusing Trump of doing. Today they are supposed to bring in a highly partisan, disgraced, fired Ambassador of the Ukraine who was bad mouthing the Trump administration to Ukrainians. Now you might agree with her but that's not what an Ambassador does. This needs to be public. How can someone this partisan be a credible witness. We've already seen liberals have no problem with lying. This is third world crap.
They are not allowing the Republicans to not only ... (
show quote)
So you think its good to allow the accused to control the investigations not the prosecution... now that's 3rd world to me...
emarine wrote:
So you think its good to allow the accused to control the investigations not the prosecution... now that's 3rd world to me...
Telling a bit of a lie aren’t you? Where did I say the investigated should control being investigated? This should be done according to precedent and procedures followed before. Why are you OK with Democrats breaking with tradition?
JFlorio wrote:
Telling a bit of a lie aren’t you? Where did I say the investigated should control being investigated? This should be done according to precedent and procedures followed before. Why are you OK with Democrats breaking with tradition?
That's what I would like to know.
They'd be screaming their heads off about a prez Hillary.
JFlorio wrote:
Telling a bit of a lie aren’t you? Where did I say the investigated should control being investigated? This should be done according to precedent and procedures followed before. Why are you OK with Democrats breaking with tradition?
We talking the Whistle blowers coming out here?...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.