Just As I Predicted
Oct 3, 2019 08:00:49 #
Schiff is setting up a bogus hearing that violates House rules. He is having it behind closed doors so the public will not hear any of the testimony. This allows him and his allies to leak information to the MSM who will joyfully spin it in the Democrats favor. He is also controlling questioning to aide him and the Democrats. A hearing with no semblance of fairness. I predicted this is what the Democrats would do just a few fays ago.
Oct 3, 2019 08:20:24 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Liberty Tree wrote:
Schiff is setting up a bogus hearing that violates House rules. He is having it behind closed doors so the public will not hear any of the testimony. This allows him and his allies to leak information to the MSM who will joyfully spin it in the Democrats favor. He is also controlling questioning to aide him and the Democrats. A hearing with no semblance of fairness. I predicted this is what the Democrats would do just a few fays ago.
Hmm, sounds exactly like what went on when the GOP controlled the house. Ain't karma a b***h?
Oct 3, 2019 08:34:51 #
lpnmajor wrote:
Hmm, sounds exactly like what went on when the GOP controlled the house. Ain't karma a b***h?
Nothing like this. Besides you Democrats keep harping on not bringing up the past.
Oct 3, 2019 08:44:49 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Liberty Tree wrote:
Nothing like this. Besides you Democrats keep harping on not bringing up the past.
I'm not a Democrat. Maybe that's why you're so out of touch, you think there are only two parties in the world.
Oct 3, 2019 08:53:35 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Schiff is setting up a bogus hearing that violates House rules. He is having it behind closed doors so the public will not hear any of the testimony. This allows him and his allies to leak information to the MSM who will joyfully spin it in the Democrats favor. He is also controlling questioning to aide him and the Democrats. A hearing with no semblance of fairness. I predicted this is what the Democrats would do just a few fays ago.
It is impossible to hold a public hearing when dealing with classified information and claims, spurious or not of executive privilege. If he held a public hearing you would be pissing and moaning that it was done for show to embarrass your illustrious Pumpkinfuhrer.
Oct 3, 2019 09:21:19 #
lpnmajor wrote:
I'm not a Democrat. Maybe that's why you're so out of touch, you think there are only two parties in the world.
You just side with them on every issue and h**e Trump.
Oct 3, 2019 09:42:12 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is impossible to hold a public hearing when dealing with classified information and claims, spurious or not of executive privilege. If he held a public hearing you would be pissing and moaning that it was done for show to embarrass your illustrious Pumpkinfuhrer.
Actually, the whistle blower violated the law and is not a whistle blower. By the WB going to Shifty first, that violates the law on how real WB can file complaints. Everyone will see more on this in next day or 2.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
Oct 3, 2019 09:59:03 #
CodyCoonhound wrote:
Actually, the whistle blower violated the law and is not a whistle blower. By the WB going to Shifty first, that violates the law on how real WB can file complaints. Everyone will see more on this in next day or 2.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
Ou do not think a little thing like violating the law will stop the Democrats, do you?
Oct 3, 2019 11:07:28 #
CodyCoonhound wrote:
Actually, the whistle blower violated the law and is not a whistle blower. By the WB going to Shifty first, that violates the law on how real WB can file complaints. Everyone will see more on this in next day or 2.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
No ware in the law does it say it should have gone to the WH first all he did was ask advice nothing criminal! But barr and trump obstructed Justice once more!
Oct 3, 2019 11:12:32 #
CodyCoonhound wrote:
Actually, the whistle blower violated the law and is not a whistle blower. By the WB going to Shifty first, that violates the law on how real WB can file complaints. Everyone will see more on this in next day or 2.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
The law says that a WB must go directly to the Inspector General and no one else. By going to Shifty and coordinating with the dem's (as reported by NYT) , the WB disqualified themselves.
He did not, this is just made up nonsense in a futile effort to create a smokescreen around Trumps criminality. According to Trumps hand picked security advisor everything was done by the book and the complaint checked out from multiple sources as credible.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.