nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Trump retweets a comment by a Texas preacher who said there would be a "civil war like" division in the country if Trump were to be impeached, but you l*****t Trump h**ers make the claim that he's advocating civil war. I mean, heck, they can't even get the meaning of a written remark right, how can they be accurate about things someone told them they had "heard?"

And they do it over and over so, how could we possibly accept their second hand BS as it relates to a whistle blower's claim??

Lonewolf

he claims first hand knowledge

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

It's not in the complaint.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

""I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues’ accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another. In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly.""

EmilyD

He says on the first page of his complaint that he did not have first-hand knowledge of what was said. Read nwtk2007's post above - that is the direct quote from the first page of his complaint.

woodguru

I don't care if he read it on a roll of toilet paper, it's now good from Trump's mouth and the official notes on one conversation, nevermind that congress has a legal constitutional right to see any conversations they want to.

It was good as soon as it was verified by the IC IG, further verified by Trump who still sees nothing wrong with what he did, which makes defending him impossible.

There is more to come out on this... much more.

Kevyn

Trump had no business re tweeting some crackpots babbling. What a decent man would have done is discouraged the so called pastor from making such ridiculous statements and to encourage Americans to have faith in the systems provided by our founders. As to your second question, you do realize that when the inspector general reviewed and investigated the complaint he found it to be credible and a threat to national security and Trumps hand picked intelligence director agreed.

EmilyD

Yes....much more. And you're not going to like it one bit.

woodguru

Why did he need to repeat that at all? It's because he likes to say the things like bikers are tough, they would have something to say about him being impeached, dems are trying a c**p, they will take your guns, religion, and freedom

EmilyD

What is it called when they try to impeach someone who has done nothing impeachable? A C**P!! That is what this is.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

If Trump gets impeached, it will cause a "really big rift" in the country. Is that better? It's flat out true especially when the current division in the country it considered.

The Justice Department overruled the ICIG’s determination, finding that the complaint was not “urgent” because it did not relate to “the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity,”and therefore did not have to be released to the congressional intelligence committees. Further, the ICIG’s preliminary review found "some indica" of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate. LOL! Some? LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!! Also, the whistle blower complaint was made by an anonymous member of the intelligence community who did not have direct knowledge of the call but instead relied on “hearsay” gleaned from White House officials. (The whistle blower said that him/herself.)

And, since this is the Trump picked guy(s) then you can't make the claim they are just doing Trumps bidding as you would have if they'd decided it wasn't credible. By the way, credible means "not claiming aliens were involved."

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I don't know why he retweeted it. Why do you l*****ts say the stupid things y'all say?

He gets his message across, seems a little off his rocker and then he beats y'alls collective a$$es and then everyone sees just how lame the l*****t Trump h**ers really are. LOLOL!