woodguru

Here's the proof if you need any, what are we doing talking about an impeachment based on what the whistleblower had to say that he felt was urgent if he is a joke?

Whistleblowers make a report, it goes to the intelligence attorney general, he looks into it and determines whether there is anything credible there. At that point the whistleblower would have done their job, except in this case the white house and Barr illegally tried to shut down the complaint, trying to say nobody involved could talk about this.

Now the president is breaking the law in a few ways unrelated to the Ukrainian thing besides wh**ever he did that was an abuse of power.

He is trying to find the whereabouts or identity of the WB...which is against the law
He is trying to intimidate him and discourage him from talking about more he knows or has heard
He is instructing white house officials who have knowledge not to talk... obviously illegally obstructing a constitutionally legal investigation

Those three things are impeachable violations of the constitution and law.

The whistleblower did what whistleblowers do, blew the lid off abuses of power, and pressured Trump into further violations of the law.

Lonewolf

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

The gig is up, you people manufactured a whistleblower.

EL Loc: Massachusetts

A whistleblower who didn't hear what he reported.
Anyone could do that.

Trumpnotthestormiestpres Loc: L.A.

The President had a right to confront his accuser..
The people on the call heard no quid pro quo.

If so they would have blown the whistle.

Trump should have moved through other channels. But while he has the guy on the phone.. that's his style.

The v**ers can decide if they want it.

How come no whistleblower came forward when the Biden video went the rounds through the press?

Don't see chairman schitt breaking the bank pulling that hearing together.

And since the intelligence committee chairman and others didn't bother to investigate this blatant, verbatim quid pro quo, Schiff and his lying pack of weasels are guilty of looking the other way.

When the President of the United States smells a rat he asks questions. After seeing the video, he mentions this to his attorney and others .
When POTUS initiates an investigation, the Congress begins an impeachment?

Just because Biden is running for President doesn't mean that he ain't guilty.

So is that why Biden can't afford to drop out of the race?
Because then the "I'm only being investigated because I'm running against Trump" argument falls apart .

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Exactly! Trump hasn't left a trail of dead witnesses like Obama and the Clinton's do.

So I'm not concerned for this alleged individuals safety...

Edward Snowden The mother of all modern day whistleblowers, his identity wasn't concealed.

Trumpnotthestormiestpres Loc: L.A.

The whistleblower stature is the only way Schiff can plant a lackey while hiding their original allegiances and loyalties.

If it was a legit concern then EVERY intelligence agency employee would have been filing the same complaint.

The comms ppl would have told 20 pppl.

Funny how Adam schitt the intelligence committee chairman, isn't concerned with why the white house has such a series of continuing leaks.

I guess he doesn't care as long as it sits up trouble for Trump.

Liberty Tree

You would have a whole different opinion if this was happening to a Democrat. That is why you are such an unamerican fraud.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Adam S**tty had the whistle blower's complaint in his hands a month before it became public.

The Mysterious Whistleblower Complaint: What Is Adam Schiff Talking About?

‘Rogue Intelligence Officer’ Likely Coordinated ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint with Adam Schiff’s Staff

Adam Schiff did the Most Insane, D********g Things Ever Done In a Congressional Hearing

Wait a MINUTE: Tweet Adam ‘Schiffty’ Schiff sent out a MONTH ago looks very, very familiar (hint, whistleblower)

There is no doubt that Adam S**tty colluded with the mystery man to set this thing up. Recently, S**tty stood on the House floor and read his own version of The Phone Call. It was the most unmasked bald faced lie I have ever witnessed.

Pariahjf

1. Since this is not a court case, confronting your accuser is out of the question, as this is only an inquiry to this point.

2. Even if Biden admitted that in the video, he was working together with the EU, the IMF, and several civil organizations within the Ukraine to remove the prosecutor from office due to corruption issues.

3. Burisma WAS investigated by Shokin----but that was from 2010 to 2012 for alleged special permits that were granted to them.

4. H****r B***n joined Burisma in 2014.

5. Yuri Lutsenko, the prosecutor general who succeeded Shokin, said there was no evidence that H****r B***n did anything illegal or wrong.

This WAS an attempt to influence a national e******n on Trump's part. Do the research----dig deeper.

Trumpnotthestormiestpres Loc: L.A.

But if is the slam dunk Schiff insists , then why not speed past the inquiry and go straight to the v**e hearing?

That's my question.

Schiffty and Nancy like the Press attention. They are doing this to let the press absorb it and reduplicate back in broadcast and print.


If they really had the dirt they NEEDED THEY WOULD LET THE COMPLAINT FUNCTION.

sailor bob

What is Schiff's first name? Dumb or Dip? Or is Schiff his first name like in Schiff for brains? Just wondering.

Tug484

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Oh it's just scratching the Biden's criminal surface. We haven't even got down to the stench of the Biden's foreign money fraud and schemes.

Auntie Dee

You are full of "SCHIFF"!