straightUp wrote:
I think a lot of people who keep saying Trump is winning are really just trying to convince themselves.
You sound like all the other losers on this site.
MR Mister wrote:
You sound like all the other losers on this site.
Aw... do the people on this site make you mad? Do you wanna hug?
JFlorio wrote:
You talk as if your opinion is sacrosanct.
If you could challenge my opinion with facts and logic you probably wouldn't get that impression.
JFlorio wrote:
You don’t know the law or have near the comprehension others have.
How would you know?
JFlorio wrote:
The t***sfer of calls to a more secure server has been done by other presidents.
That doesn't change what I said about it.
JFlorio wrote:
It could easily been done because of leaks.
leaks are only a problem if your hiding something.
JFlorio wrote:
The President is the highest authority on classified material. He’s not because you say he’s not you arrogant snob.
I didn't say he wasn't. You might want to pay closer attention to what I am saying. The president might be the highest authority on deciding how to classify material. But what I said is the American people are still constitutionally a higher authority than the president and as such we have every right to suspect the president is abusing his authority and every right to call him out on it.
Sorry to disappoint you but we ARE a constitutional republic, not a despotic monarchy. You could always move to Saudi Arabia where they have a despotic monarchy. You might feel more comfortable brown-nosing the king there.
JFlorio wrote:
There’s no 10 counts that some non-partisan legal body has found were violated. That’s political assumptions.
The 10 counts I am referring to have indeed been proven. The refusal to accept that is political denial.
JFlorio wrote:
If you’re as smart as you think, you would see that Biden is guiltier of what you accuse Trump of.
And yet you still can't even tell me what Biden is guilty of. LOL
straightUp wrote:
And yet you still can't even tell me what Biden is guilty of. LOL
Of course I can. Biden bribed or threatened a leader of a foreign power ,it’s easy to google. He admits it. Those 10 counts have not been proven. You are just throwing it out there. If they had been proven Mueller would have listed the particular statutes that Trump was guilty of.
So by your explanation on Constitutional Authority the American people should see everything. Then why classifications at all? Leaks are a problem when spun or twisted for political purposes also. Your straighup alright. Straight up a troll.
straightUp wrote:
Mueller's findings were s**t-canned because the president is being protected from the law. I guarantee you that if Trump is v**ed out in 2020 and becomes subject to law again, Mueller's findings will be instrumental in Trumps conviction.
Which law is that? Find it. I think you're blowing smoke.
See what vindictive liars you folks are?
Destroy whoever stands between you and the goals of the Klinton Kabal...no matter what...
...pursue them, their families, their friends, their associates with wh**ever lie, wh**ever tactic, wh**ever character assassination it takes to GET THEM...
...destroy their businesses, destroy their livelihoods, hound their
children!You people awful people who should never be in charge of anything and we'll see to it this stops!
I think he blows more than smoke.
BigMike wrote:
Which law is that? Find it. I think you're blowing smoke.
See what vindictive liars you folks are?
Destroy whoever stands between you and the goals of the Klinton Kabal...no matter what...
...pursue them, their families, their friends, their associates with wh**ever lie, wh**ever tactic, wh**ever character assassination it takes to GET THEM...
...destroy their businesses, destroy their livelihoods, hound their children!
You people awful people who should never be in charge of anything and we'll see to it this stops!
Which law is that? Find it. I think you're blowing... (
show quote)
Seth wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (
show quote)
He's damn sharp, for sure, and perpetually underestimated by our enemies...which is gooood!
BigMike wrote:
Which law is that? Find it. I think you're blowing smoke.
See what vindictive liars you folks are?
Destroy whoever stands between you and the goals of the Klinton Kabal...no matter what...
...pursue them, their families, their friends, their associates with wh**ever lie, wh**ever tactic, wh**ever character assassination it takes to GET THEM...
...destroy their businesses, destroy their livelihoods, hound their children!
You people awful people who should never be in charge of anything and we'll see to it this stops!
Which law is that? Find it. I think you're blowing... (
show quote)
L*****ts simply repeat a lie (also known as "the party line") over and over because they follow the reasoning that if they repeat it often enough it will be believed.
I notice, especially here at OPP, that a thread can be full of posts contradicting, with facts and links, wh**ever their spewage happens to be, and they'll still demand a "link" or "an example," as if posts that refute their lies went in one eye and out the other.
Reasoning with a lefty is like standing in a bucket and trying to pull yourself up by the handle.
To all intents and purposes, they are brainwashed robots.
straightUp wrote:
Guliani is not employed by the government. Technically, he is a private contractor. The crazy thing is Guliani is probably just the tip of the iceberg.
If you think the Democrats are hurting for things to get Trump on, you are way off the mark. If they wanted to they could bring Trumps entire cabinet into question because NONE of them have been confirmed by Congress which is a constitutional requirement. That puts ALL their activity under scrutiny and given the extent to which the Trump Administration has cut off Congress and ruled the country on executive orders alone... I'm betting high that some legal lines have been crossed.
Guliani is not employed by the government. Technic... (
show quote)
Go for it, then. I'll enjoy watching your boys get stymied again.
straightUp wrote:
$1000? Any ideas how we can secure this bet while maintaining anonymity? Maybe we can sticky-post it and just call it a grand.
Just to be clear, we are talking about after he is no longer presiding over our republic, when he can no longer seek executive privilege. No limits on time. If it takes them 10 years, so be it.
Still interested?
Wow...you really,
really h**e Trump, doncha?
Good thing we're taking out your power structures. You people are evil and vindictive. I'm sure
you would make a perfect concentration camp guard.
Trained apes is what progressive grunts have turned into.
straightUp wrote:
...you know Trump can't do anything on his own.
No...
you "know" that because that is your programming. All the better for us.
straightUp wrote:
What does any of that matter?
Because they've tried to frame Trump for their crimes since he got into office to keep us from finding all this out...and he just set them up.
It may not matter to you, Guido, because you're a mind-numbed robot...but it's gonna matter to your programmers. Oh yeah!
Dey be in trubble.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.