lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Why we're so set on exonerating or convicting someone, before the investigation even begins. Does this mean that we're willing to ignore or excuse anything that might interfere with our pre-investigation conclusion?

Why people fight to hide information they claim shows no wrongdoing. If I were innocent, I'd damn sure like to prove it beyond all doubt, and I would not expect anyone to take my "trust me" to the bank. I guess that's just me.

Why we can predict with 100% accuracy, what partisans will think about any given issue. It's pretty damn obvious that Republicans and Democrats are incapable of agreeing that s**t is normally brown, because if it's dished out by one of their own, they'll claim it's solid gold and smells like lavender. That also begs the question; why are we so eager and willing to eat that golden, lavender smelling s**t................even when we know it still TASTES like s**t, because, well..................it's still s**t.

ImLogicallyRight

Well said.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

In a perfect world, you would be right. But, we live in an imperfect nation where we are taught if we are accused of a crime, say nothing until our lawyer is present, where "friends" wear wires to "catch" evidence to be used in courts, where laws are not used equally. And this is doubly true in politics...one day we hear that "information gathering" on your political opponent is okay and does not break or bend laws (like the Steelle Dossier) and a year later it is called a crime. I guess different rules for each party.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Lonewolf

Good point