One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 24, 2019 20:12:32   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
21,087
NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 17: People hold sign saying "climate emergency" while participating in a direct action with a protest group called Extinction R*******n on April 17, 2019 in New York City. The activists are demanding governments declare a climate emergency to combat pollution. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.24 Sep 20195192
2:43
More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 20:45:14   #
Seth
 
no propaganda please wrote:
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
21,087
NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 17: People hold sign saying "climate emergency" while participating in a direct action with a protest group called Extinction R*******n on April 17, 2019 in New York City. The activists are demanding governments declare a climate emergency to combat pollution. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.24 Sep 20195192
2:43
More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Em... (show quote)


The left won't listen, because it's okay to them if people in underdeveloped nations die from lack of access to electricity -- their g*******t agenda is all that counts, the men, women and children who die or suffer will just be collateral damage.

They will ignore, ruin or ridicule these scientists and continue to pretend they believe the lies they tell their useful i***ts.

Their useful i***ts, in turn, will continue to stupidly support the Chicken Little alarmism whose "solution" to a non-existent problem would destroy our economy beyond repair as well as those of the rest of the world.

Thank G-d Trump was elected president, and not Hillary!

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 22:21:56   #
badbob85037
 
no propaganda please wrote:
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
21,087
NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 17: People hold sign saying "climate emergency" while participating in a direct action with a protest group called Extinction R*******n on April 17, 2019 in New York City. The activists are demanding governments declare a climate emergency to combat pollution. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.24 Sep 20195192
2:43
More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Em... (show quote)


Of course they did. The only scientist saying there is g****l w*****g are ones getting government grants and since here in the US those government grants are not getting granted, well you know. The world of pathetic L*****t. Making it into a global crises to bring in the new world order Rockefeller told us about. Thank God for Trump

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2019 22:29:08   #
badbob85037
 
Seth wrote:
The left won't listen, because it's okay to them if people in underdeveloped nations die from lack of access to electricity -- their g*******t agenda is all that counts, the men, women and children who die or suffer will just be collateral damage.

They will ignore, ruin or ridicule these scientists and continue to pretend they believe the lies they tell their useful i***ts.

Their useful i***ts, in turn, will continue to stupidly support the Chicken Little alarmism whose "solution" to a non-existent problem would destroy our economy beyond repair as well as those of the rest of the world.

Thank G-d Trump was elected president, and not Hillary!
The left won't listen, because it's okay to them i... (show quote)


These people you call useful i***ts doesn't start to describe their stupidity. Just how many years have these useless i***ts fell for this crap 10, 15?

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 22:38:10   #
Seth
 
badbob85037 wrote:
These people you call useful i***ts doesn't start to describe their stupidity. Just how many years have these useless i***ts fell for this crap 10, 15?


We've been "doomed" for decades. One decade we were all going to die from acid rain, another from aerosol spray cans blowing a hole in the ozone layer, another from g****l c*****g, right after that g****l w*****g, now the blanket doomsday terror, "c*****e c****e," all mankind's doing.

If anything k**ls us at all, it'll be the gross tonnage of all that "doom" collapsing on us and crushing us.

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 23:18:49   #
manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA
 
Seth wrote:
We've been "doomed" for decades. One decade we were all going to die from acid rain, another from aerosol spray cans blowing a hole in the ozone layer, another from g****l c*****g, right after that g****l w*****g, now the blanket doomsday terror, "c*****e c****e," all mankind's doing.

If anything k**ls us at all, it'll be the gross tonnage of all that "doom" collapsing on us and crushing us.
We've been "doomed" for decades. One dec... (show quote)


One should worry more about a rogue asteroid or comet emerging out of the darkness to doom the planet.

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 23:26:36   #
Seth
 
manning5 wrote:
One should worry more about a rogue asteroid or comet emerging out of the darkness to doom the planet.


Somehow, in the unlikely event there were surviving Democrats, they would find a way to say it was an anthropogenic event, that the comet or asteroid was drawn to the earth by C02.

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2019 23:36:40   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Seth wrote:
Somehow, in the unlikely event there were surviving Democrats, they would find a way to say it was an anthropogenic event, that the comet or asteroid was drawn to the earth by C02.


Lol! Probably true!

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 02:54:22   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Seth wrote:
Somehow, in the unlikely event there were surviving Democrats, they would find a way to say it was an anthropogenic event, that the comet or asteroid was drawn to the earth by C02.


That or blame Trump...

Can't imagine too many of them surviving.... Safe spaces won't do much against an asteroid...

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 03:34:43   #
Seth
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
That or blame Trump...

Can't imagine too many of them surviving.... Safe spaces won't do much against an asteroid...


LOL! I can see AOC now, somehow still alive:

"If Trump hadn't pulled us out of the Paris Accords, that asteroid never would've hit us."

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 03:48:41   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Seth wrote:
LOL! I can see AOC now, somehow still alive:

"If Trump hadn't pulled us out of the Paris Accords, that asteroid never would've hit us."


I picture her being ripped apart by a ragged band of survivors as she attempts to prevent further destruction to the environment by stamping out their fires and slaughtering their last remaining cows...

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2019 04:34:45   #
Seth
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I picture her being ripped apart by a ragged band of survivors as she attempts to prevent further destruction to the environment by stamping out their fires and slaughtering their last remaining cows...



Reply
Sep 25, 2019 07:19:48   #
Kevyn
 
no propaganda please wrote:
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
21,087
NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 17: People hold sign saying "climate emergency" while participating in a direct action with a protest group called Extinction R*******n on April 17, 2019 in New York City. The activists are demanding governments declare a climate emergency to combat pollution. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.24 Sep 20195192
2:43
More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Em... (show quote)


The “scientists” who wrote this is a right wing theologist who has no science background at all rather a degree in philosophy. As an aside he is a catholic priest who fathered a child a few years ago.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 12:14:13   #
bahmer
 
Seth wrote:
The left won't listen, because it's okay to them if people in underdeveloped nations die from lack of access to electricity -- their g*******t agenda is all that counts, the men, women and children who die or suffer will just be collateral damage.

They will ignore, ruin or ridicule these scientists and continue to pretend they believe the lies they tell their useful i***ts.

Their useful i***ts, in turn, will continue to stupidly support the Chicken Little alarmism whose "solution" to a non-existent problem would destroy our economy beyond repair as well as those of the rest of the world.

Thank G-d Trump was elected president, and not Hillary!
The left won't listen, because it's okay to them i... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 12:15:05   #
bahmer
 
no propaganda please wrote:
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
21,087
NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 17: People hold sign saying "climate emergency" while participating in a direct action with a protest group called Extinction R*******n on April 17, 2019 in New York City. The activists are demanding governments declare a climate emergency to combat pollution. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.24 Sep 20195192
2:43
More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Em... (show quote)


Very good there NPP but the left won't allow it I'm afraid.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.