The desperate left! So, all of the sudden a second or third hand account of a phone conversation several months ago which they haven't even heard or seen a transcript of is legitimate...

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

So, all of the sudden a second or third hand account of a phone conversation several months ago which they haven't even heard or seen a transcript of is legitimate fodder for impeachment?? What we have on this is a former VP, working for Obama, threatening Ukraine with not giving secured billion dollar loans, unless they fire the guy who is investigating and charging the Ukraine company the VP's son works for, with crimes of corruption.

The former VP brags about it.

This is why, I think, we are all of the sudden seeing this huge cry for impeachment now. They have got to get the attention off of that VP because it implicates Obama, their lord and savior. I also think it's a huge mistake for the dems and their chances in 2020.

The left has a "personal" h**e for Trump. It is blinding them to all perceptions and logic. They have been fully exposed.

Kevyn

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, all of the sudden a second or third hand accou... (show quote)

If the call is of no consequence Trump would personally release the transcript on FOX and Friends. If there is one thing to learn from his behavior it is the more he squeals and makes counter accusations the closer we are to the t***h.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

If the call is of no consequence Trump would personally release the transcript on FOX and Friends. If there is one thing to learn from his behavior it is the more he squeals and makes counter accusations the closer we are to the t***h.

He's offered it but it appears that it must go through channels. It will be out soon enough. Then we will all see.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

If the call is of no consequence Trump would personally release the transcript on FOX and Friends. If there is one thing to learn from his behavior it is the more he squeals and makes counter accusations the closer we are to the t***h.

Fact is, the dem's are making this an impeachable issue and they haven't even seen it. That tells the entire story.

Kevyn

nwtk2007 wrote:

He's offered it but it appears that it must go through channels. It will be out soon enough. Then we will all see.

Just like his promised tax returns?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

Just like his promised tax returns?

You do know that reduced taxes doesn't t***slate into bigger tax returns, don't you? The two are not related. In fact, by taking out less taxes from workers checks will result in a smaller tax return, but their checks were actually bigger each time they got paid under the tax cut they got.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

nwtk2007 wrote:

He's offered it but it appears that it must go through channels. It will be out soon enough. Then we will all see.

He is the blocking channel. Whistle blowers are required by law (1998 Whistle blower law...look it up) to report to Congress anything deemed urgent by the IG of the intelligence community. The IG deemed it urgent. Stopping the whistle blower from reporting to Congress is another act of Trump administration lawlessness.

It is you and Trump who are desperate.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

nwtk2007 wrote:

Fact is, the dem's are making this an impeachable issue and they haven't even seen it. That tells the entire story.

Wrong again. The impeachable issue is not what's in the transcripts, because we don't know what's in it. The issue is breaking the law...Trump is supposed to uphold the law, not undermine it.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

working class stiff wrote:

He is the blocking channel. Whistle blowers are required by law (1998 Whistle blower law...look it up) to report to Congress anything deemed urgent by the IG of the intelligence community. The IG deemed it urgent. Stopping the whistle blower from reporting to Congress is another act of Trump administration lawlessness.

It is you and Trump who are desperate.

At least you said Trump Administration and not Trump. Neither you nor i know what the process is to release it to Congress. Rest assured it will be released if there isn't anything classified and it might already be available to them should they bother to go look at it. Remember when the unredacted Mueller report was sitting there for days and days but the dems would not bother to go read it. Can you say you know any of that to be true or untrue?

By the way, who said the IG deemed it urgent??

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

working class stiff wrote:

Wrong again. The impeachable issue is not what's in the transcripts, because we don't know what's in it. The issue is breaking the law...Trump is supposed to uphold the law, not undermine it.

If there is a process to release it and it takes time, is there a law being broken or is it the left bloviating as if there is?? Trump has ALWAYS let things go through the process. This is no exception. Just hold your horses and stop acting like the irrational left proclaiming Trump is breaking the law when, in fact, you have no idea if he has, is or will.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

nwtk2007 wrote:

So, all of the sudden a second or third hand accou... (show quote)

If it's no big deal and Trump did nothing wrong, why did the acting DNI not release the whistleblower file to Congress, as is required by law? Why did the IG classify the complaint as urgent, and why did Barr prohibit the IG from giving details to Congress.

It you've nothing to hide, prove it...................by not hiding s**t.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

lpnmajor wrote:

If it's no big deal and Trump did nothing wrong, why did the acting DNI not release the whistleblower file to Congress, as is required by law? Why did the IG classify the complaint as urgent, and why did Barr prohibit the IG from giving details to Congress.

It you've nothing to hide, prove it...................by not hiding s**t.

It's being released tomorrow. Hold your horses.

working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina

nwtk2007 wrote:

At least you said Trump Administration and not Tru... (show quote)

The Inspector General himself said so.