One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph
Sep 23, 2019 09:54:17   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph
Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.


ABC News’ White House correspondent Karen Travers approvingly tweeted out a paragraph of a front-page Washington Post rant written by Philip Rucker, Robert Costa, and Rachel Bade. The paragraph comes from their cri de coeur headlined “Trump’s Ukraine Call Reveals A President Convinced Of His Own Invincibility.”

While the article matches the headline in its extreme bias and shrill outpouring of opinion — seemingly written by the Democratic National Committee’s newest batch of enthusiastic interns — it is presented as if it’s news, a common problem with our current media culture. Here’s the paragraph:

Every single assertion of this paragraph isn’t just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done. Let’s take a look at some examples.

Trump’s sense of himself as above the law has been reinforced throughout his time in office.

In fact, the main problem during the Trump administration has been the way the self-annointed “Resistance” in the media, unelected bureaucracy, and political institutions have treated Trump as if he were below the law. Traditionally, hard-fought losses are usually followed by an acceptance of the reality of e******n results, even if grudgingly.

In the case of Donald Trump, his campaign was spied on prior to the e******n by the intelligence services and government apparatus controlled by the opposing party. They used wiretaps, national security letters, human informants, and other surveillance. His t***sition was undermined by leaks suggesting that the FBI took seriously an uncorroborated and ludicrous collection of tall tales, “research” later determined to have been secretly funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

President Trump has yet to be treated as the legitimate winner of the free and f**r e******n he won in 2016. Some 70 Democrats refused to go to his inauguration in protest. The weaponized opposition material from Trump’s political enemies was used to get his national security advisor terminated, his attorney general sidelined from any oversight of his agency, to scare foreign leaders from effectively engaging in foreign policy discussions, to keep good people from serving in his administration, and to ruin the lives of anyone who worked with Trump to secure his victory.

Elites in the media, government, and political institutions have discussed ousting him through the 25th amendment, impeachment, manipulation of the economy, and other extreme measures. Fired FBI director James Comey was found to have violated Trump’s civil liberties when he violated FBI policies governing investigations. Rucker, Costa, and Bade, it might be noted, provide no evidence in support of their regurgitation of the Resistance talking point that Trump views himself as above the law.

As detailed in the Mueller report, he received help from a foreign adversary in 2016 without legal consequence.

What in the world? What are Philip Rucker, Bob Costa, and Rachel Bade smoking? This was not “detailed” in the Mueller report. This is not even a remotely accurate summation of that report, even while acknowledging how partisan of a report it was.

In fact, the report found that the entire basis for the investigation — supposed treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n — had no evidence in support of it. Not only did Trump not conspire with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n, not a single American was found to have done so. Are they trying to elevate the significance of Russia’s 100-year-old practice of meddling in U.S. e******ns, and falsely characterize those efforts as unidirectional in favor of Trump?

There are countries such as China that desperately want to defeat Trump and had that interest in the 2018 midterm e******ns and in 2020 e******ns. We know that China is actively manipulating its actions to help achieve the goal of a Trump loss in 2020. Are Rucker, Costa and Bade suggesting that whichever Democrat Trump runs against should face “legal consequence” for wh**ever machinations they employ?

It is unclear what “legal consequence” Rucker, Costa, and Bade are fantasizing about, particularly considering it’s a fantasy that even Andrew Weissman’s politically motivated special counsel team couldn’t dream of suggesting.

He sought to thwart the Russia investigation and possibly obstruct justice without consequence.

Here, Rucker, Costa, and Bade blame Trump for not sitting silently while being falsely accused of being a t*****r who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n. Treason is a crime punishable by death, but apparently President Trump complained too loudly about the false allegations made against him for Rucker, Costa, and Bade’s liking.

Through the government, he has earned profits for his businesses without consequence.

The Washington Post has been absolutely desperate to make some kind of financial impropriety case against Trump. The only problem is that they are more frequently writing about how the Resistance has effectively tarnished Trump’s brand globally. The Trump organization is a global business concern that did not disappear when Trump took office, even if he stepped away from running it.

Apparently Rucker, Costa, and Bade think that the company should not be permitted to operate while Trump is in office. It’s an interesting theory.....

Reply
Sep 23, 2019 09:57:39   #
Lonewolf
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph
Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.


ABC News’ White House correspondent Karen Travers approvingly tweeted out a paragraph of a front-page Washington Post rant written by Philip Rucker, Robert Costa, and Rachel Bade. The paragraph comes from their cri de coeur headlined “Trump’s Ukraine Call Reveals A President Convinced Of His Own Invincibility.”

While the article matches the headline in its extreme bias and shrill outpouring of opinion — seemingly written by the Democratic National Committee’s newest batch of enthusiastic interns — it is presented as if it’s news, a common problem with our current media culture. Here’s the paragraph:

Every single assertion of this paragraph isn’t just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done. Let’s take a look at some examples.

Trump’s sense of himself as above the law has been reinforced throughout his time in office.

In fact, the main problem during the Trump administration has been the way the self-annointed “Resistance” in the media, unelected bureaucracy, and political institutions have treated Trump as if he were below the law. Traditionally, hard-fought losses are usually followed by an acceptance of the reality of e******n results, even if grudgingly.

In the case of Donald Trump, his campaign was spied on prior to the e******n by the intelligence services and government apparatus controlled by the opposing party. They used wiretaps, national security letters, human informants, and other surveillance. His t***sition was undermined by leaks suggesting that the FBI took seriously an uncorroborated and ludicrous collection of tall tales, “research” later determined to have been secretly funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

President Trump has yet to be treated as the legitimate winner of the free and f**r e******n he won in 2016. Some 70 Democrats refused to go to his inauguration in protest. The weaponized opposition material from Trump’s political enemies was used to get his national security advisor terminated, his attorney general sidelined from any oversight of his agency, to scare foreign leaders from effectively engaging in foreign policy discussions, to keep good people from serving in his administration, and to ruin the lives of anyone who worked with Trump to secure his victory.

Elites in the media, government, and political institutions have discussed ousting him through the 25th amendment, impeachment, manipulation of the economy, and other extreme measures. Fired FBI director James Comey was found to have violated Trump’s civil liberties when he violated FBI policies governing investigations. Rucker, Costa, and Bade, it might be noted, provide no evidence in support of their regurgitation of the Resistance talking point that Trump views himself as above the law.

As detailed in the Mueller report, he received help from a foreign adversary in 2016 without legal consequence.

What in the world? What are Philip Rucker, Bob Costa, and Rachel Bade smoking? This was not “detailed” in the Mueller report. This is not even a remotely accurate summation of that report, even while acknowledging how partisan of a report it was.

In fact, the report found that the entire basis for the investigation — supposed treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n — had no evidence in support of it. Not only did Trump not conspire with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n, not a single American was found to have done so. Are they trying to elevate the significance of Russia’s 100-year-old practice of meddling in U.S. e******ns, and falsely characterize those efforts as unidirectional in favor of Trump?

There are countries such as China that desperately want to defeat Trump and had that interest in the 2018 midterm e******ns and in 2020 e******ns. We know that China is actively manipulating its actions to help achieve the goal of a Trump loss in 2020. Are Rucker, Costa and Bade suggesting that whichever Democrat Trump runs against should face “legal consequence” for wh**ever machinations they employ?

It is unclear what “legal consequence” Rucker, Costa, and Bade are fantasizing about, particularly considering it’s a fantasy that even Andrew Weissman’s politically motivated special counsel team couldn’t dream of suggesting.

He sought to thwart the Russia investigation and possibly obstruct justice without consequence.

Here, Rucker, Costa, and Bade blame Trump for not sitting silently while being falsely accused of being a t*****r who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n. Treason is a crime punishable by death, but apparently President Trump complained too loudly about the false allegations made against him for Rucker, Costa, and Bade’s liking.

Through the government, he has earned profits for his businesses without consequence.

The Washington Post has been absolutely desperate to make some kind of financial impropriety case against Trump. The only problem is that they are more frequently writing about how the Resistance has effectively tarnished Trump’s brand globally. The Trump organization is a global business concern that did not disappear when Trump took office, even if he stepped away from running it.

Apparently Rucker, Costa, and Bade think that the company should not be permitted to operate while Trump is in office. It’s an interesting theory.....
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washing... (show quote)


All other presidents have divested interests in their business and put them in a blind trust!
He still runs his and it will catch up with him!

Reply
Sep 23, 2019 09:58:20   #
peg w
 
I don't belive you spent so much time on this biased rant. Trump has only had contempt about the laws of the U S, which he belives don't pertain to himself.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2019 10:00:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Lonewolf wrote:
All other presidents have divested interests in their business and put them in a blind trust!
He still runs his and it will catch up with him!


Thanks for stopping by with your BS.

Reply
Sep 23, 2019 10:02:44   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
peg w wrote:
I don't belive you spent so much time on this biased rant. Trump has only had contempt about the laws of the U S, which he belives don't pertain to himself.


Oh Peggy, Peggy, Peggy!!!
That's all you got?

You Socialists/Democrats are in deep doo-doo.

Reply
Sep 23, 2019 12:28:23   #
Kevyn
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph
Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.


ABC News’ White House correspondent Karen Travers approvingly tweeted out a paragraph of a front-page Washington Post rant written by Philip Rucker, Robert Costa, and Rachel Bade. The paragraph comes from their cri de coeur headlined “Trump’s Ukraine Call Reveals A President Convinced Of His Own Invincibility.”

While the article matches the headline in its extreme bias and shrill outpouring of opinion — seemingly written by the Democratic National Committee’s newest batch of enthusiastic interns — it is presented as if it’s news, a common problem with our current media culture. Here’s the paragraph:

Every single assertion of this paragraph isn’t just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done. Let’s take a look at some examples.

Trump’s sense of himself as above the law has been reinforced throughout his time in office.

In fact, the main problem during the Trump administration has been the way the self-annointed “Resistance” in the media, unelected bureaucracy, and political institutions have treated Trump as if he were below the law. Traditionally, hard-fought losses are usually followed by an acceptance of the reality of e******n results, even if grudgingly.

In the case of Donald Trump, his campaign was spied on prior to the e******n by the intelligence services and government apparatus controlled by the opposing party. They used wiretaps, national security letters, human informants, and other surveillance. His t***sition was undermined by leaks suggesting that the FBI took seriously an uncorroborated and ludicrous collection of tall tales, “research” later determined to have been secretly funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

President Trump has yet to be treated as the legitimate winner of the free and f**r e******n he won in 2016. Some 70 Democrats refused to go to his inauguration in protest. The weaponized opposition material from Trump’s political enemies was used to get his national security advisor terminated, his attorney general sidelined from any oversight of his agency, to scare foreign leaders from effectively engaging in foreign policy discussions, to keep good people from serving in his administration, and to ruin the lives of anyone who worked with Trump to secure his victory.

Elites in the media, government, and political institutions have discussed ousting him through the 25th amendment, impeachment, manipulation of the economy, and other extreme measures. Fired FBI director James Comey was found to have violated Trump’s civil liberties when he violated FBI policies governing investigations. Rucker, Costa, and Bade, it might be noted, provide no evidence in support of their regurgitation of the Resistance talking point that Trump views himself as above the law.

As detailed in the Mueller report, he received help from a foreign adversary in 2016 without legal consequence.

What in the world? What are Philip Rucker, Bob Costa, and Rachel Bade smoking? This was not “detailed” in the Mueller report. This is not even a remotely accurate summation of that report, even while acknowledging how partisan of a report it was.

In fact, the report found that the entire basis for the investigation — supposed treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n — had no evidence in support of it. Not only did Trump not conspire with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n, not a single American was found to have done so. Are they trying to elevate the significance of Russia’s 100-year-old practice of meddling in U.S. e******ns, and falsely characterize those efforts as unidirectional in favor of Trump?

There are countries such as China that desperately want to defeat Trump and had that interest in the 2018 midterm e******ns and in 2020 e******ns. We know that China is actively manipulating its actions to help achieve the goal of a Trump loss in 2020. Are Rucker, Costa and Bade suggesting that whichever Democrat Trump runs against should face “legal consequence” for wh**ever machinations they employ?

It is unclear what “legal consequence” Rucker, Costa, and Bade are fantasizing about, particularly considering it’s a fantasy that even Andrew Weissman’s politically motivated special counsel team couldn’t dream of suggesting.

He sought to thwart the Russia investigation and possibly obstruct justice without consequence.

Here, Rucker, Costa, and Bade blame Trump for not sitting silently while being falsely accused of being a t*****r who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n. Treason is a crime punishable by death, but apparently President Trump complained too loudly about the false allegations made against him for Rucker, Costa, and Bade’s liking.

Through the government, he has earned profits for his businesses without consequence.

The Washington Post has been absolutely desperate to make some kind of financial impropriety case against Trump. The only problem is that they are more frequently writing about how the Resistance has effectively tarnished Trump’s brand globally. The Trump organization is a global business concern that did not disappear when Trump took office, even if he stepped away from running it.

Apparently Rucker, Costa, and Bade think that the company should not be permitted to operate while Trump is in office. It’s an interesting theory.....
Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washing... (show quote)


The point of the article is spot on, Trump is acting in a manner like Richard Nixon, against the advice of his staff and long established legal norms, he is acting outside the law because he feels as President he is above the law. He is not, and hopefully he will soon be shown just how wrong he is, if not it will be the end of our 240 year old republic. I just hope the powers to be do not make the mistake that Ford made by pardoning Nixon. Trump needs to be put on trial in view of the whole world and be held accountable for his crimes against our nation.

Reply
Sep 23, 2019 12:50:29   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Lonewolf wrote:
All other presidents have divested interests in their business and put them in a blind trust!
He still runs his and it will catch up with him!


No they haven't nor should they have to.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2019 13:18:27   #
Auntie Dee
 
Kevyn wrote:
The point of the article is spot on, Trump is acting in a manner like Richard Nixon, against the advice of his staff and long established legal norms, he is acting outside the law because he feels as President he is above the law. He is not, and hopefully he will soon be shown just how wrong he is, if not it will be the end of our 240 year old republic. I just hope the powers to be do not make the mistake that Ford made by pardoning Nixon. Trump needs to be put on trial in view of the whole world and be held accountable for his crimes against our nation.
The point of the article is spot on, Trump is acti... (show quote)


It is not criminal to "act...against the advice of staff & long established norms"!

You NOR anyone else has the ability to read our President's mind and know how he "feels"!

Everything in this well thought out rebuttal of the original article is a PROVEN fact! You are so far gone on your Trump hatred you seem to have lost all ability to even read & comprehend!

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 08:57:47   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Auntie Dee wrote:
It is not criminal to "act...against the advice of staff & long established norms"!

You NOR anyone else has the ability to read our President's mind and know how he "feels"!

Everything in this well thought out rebuttal of the original article is a PROVEN fact! You are so far gone on your Trump hatred you seem to have lost all ability to even read & comprehend!


Did Kevyn ever have the all ability to even read or comprehend?
Another example of his meager capacity.

"he is acting outside the law because he feels as President he is above the law." - kevy

Please give us an example of that.

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 12:05:09   #
Kevyn
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Did Kevyn ever have the all ability to even read or comprehend?
Another example of his meager capacity.

"he is acting outside the law because he feels as President he is above the law." - kevy

Please give us an example of that.


Violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution, suborning perjury, felony campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice and racketeering. And all of that is just since he started running for president. His entire life has been a d********g walking white collar crime spree.

Reply
Sep 24, 2019 12:29:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Kevyn wrote:
Violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution, suborning perjury, felony campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice and racketeering. And all of that is just since he started running for president. His entire life has been a d********g walking white collar crime spree.


All BS!!
All lies.
All refuted.
All to no avail!
Trump will be re-elected in 2020.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.