eagleye13 Loc: Fl

NY Times gets slammed: CNN’s Stelter, S.E. Cupp’s vicious takedown

https://i.rmbl.ws/s8/2/R/t/S/0/RtS0a.caa.1.mp4?b=0&u=bt1g

In what may just be the first of its kind, on Saturday two of left-wing CNN’s hosts criticized The New York Times, a fellow left-wing outlet, for its “rough year” of f**e news and shoddy behavior.

“The New York Times is having a rough year,” CNN host S.E. Cupp, who identifies as a conservative, began. “There have been a number of controversial and regrettable flubs.”

“Earlier this year, publishing an anti-Semitic cartoon in its international edition. A columnist’s questionable response to a professor who called him a bed bug. Caving to Twitter mobs to change headlines or add more opinions to their news coverage. Then there was the botched Brett Kavanaugh story. None of these things represent the Times entirely or all the excellent journalists and editors that they employ, but they’re also not helping.”

Cupp forgot to mention the Times’ repeated decisions to hire anti-Semites and r****ts, not to mention its recent praising of deceased Chinese dictator Mao Zedong and its blaming of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on mindless airplanes versus Islamic extremists.

Seth

Now that's funny.

The C*******t News Network, smarting from their nosedive in viewership, trying to use the Gray whore Lady, their number one competitor for "who can be the leftmost l*****ts," as a distraction.

"Sure we're a bunch of f**e news lying l*****ts, but the New York Times is worse!"

The left cannibalizing the left.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Their molty chickens are coming home to roost.

Stelter has spewd plenty of his own featherless chicken poop.

Seth

See? Those fine folks on the left offer us a couple of great options: we can have our poop with or without feathers.

What a deal!

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

That's how I see the socialists vying for a shot at the title of President.

Seth

Even many Democrats of the Kennedy era would probably be looking at the Dem primary debates as a comedy act and preparing to v**e Republican.

These people don't even realize how far they've distanced themselves from the very concept of America.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Agreed, JFK would be appalled by the neo-proggies.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

I agree!

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

So what will it take to get the Democrat Party to reverse course?
E******ns?

Seth

Patriotism. A suddenly discovered love of country they certainly don't embrace now, and haven't for years. Some Kennedy Democrats reappearing. Some less corrupt Democrat politicians being elected. The MSM somehow remembering what it would mean to be real journalists again.

For example:

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/23/media-corruption-on-perfect-display-in-one-washington-post-paragraph/

https://saraacarter.com/whistleblower-hysteria-why-democrats-dont-want-to-investigate-joe-biden-and-son/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social-pug

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Good example, Seth; https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/23/media-corruption-on-perfect-display-in-one-washington-post-paragraph/

Posted on its own thread.

Media Corruption On Perfect Display In One Washington Post Paragraph
Every single assertion of this paragraph isn't just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done.


ABC News’ White House correspondent Karen Travers approvingly tweeted out a paragraph of a front-page Washington Post rant written by Philip Rucker, Robert Costa, and Rachel Bade. The paragraph comes from their cri de coeur headlined “Trump’s Ukraine Call Reveals A President Convinced Of His Own Invincibility.”

While the article matches the headline in its extreme bias and shrill outpouring of opinion — seemingly written by the Democratic National Committee’s newest batch of enthusiastic interns — it is presented as if it’s news, a common problem with our current media culture. Here’s the paragraph:

Every single assertion of this paragraph isn’t just wrong, but the opposite of right. In each sentence, Trump is being blamed for things his political opponents have done. Let’s take a look at some examples.

Trump’s sense of himself as above the law has been reinforced throughout his time in office.

In fact, the main problem during the Trump administration has been the way the self-annointed “Resistance” in the media, unelected bureaucracy, and political institutions have treated Trump as if he were below the law. Traditionally, hard-fought losses are usually followed by an acceptance of the reality of e******n results, even if grudgingly.

In the case of Donald Trump, his campaign was spied on prior to the e******n by the intelligence services and government apparatus controlled by the opposing party. They used wiretaps, national security letters, human informants, and other surveillance. His t***sition was undermined by leaks suggesting that the FBI took seriously an uncorroborated and ludicrous collection of tall tales, “research” later determined to have been secretly funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

President Trump has yet to be treated as the legitimate winner of the free and f**r e******n he won in 2016. Some 70 Democrats refused to go to his inauguration in protest. The weaponized opposition material from Trump’s political enemies was used to get his national security advisor terminated, his attorney general sidelined from any oversight of his agency, to scare foreign leaders from effectively engaging in foreign policy discussions, to keep good people from serving in his administration, and to ruin the lives of anyone who worked with Trump to secure his victory.

Elites in the media, government, and political institutions have discussed ousting him through the 25th amendment, impeachment, manipulation of the economy, and other extreme measures. Fired FBI director James Comey was found to have violated Trump’s civil liberties when he violated FBI policies governing investigations. Rucker, Costa, and Bade, it might be noted, provide no evidence in support of their regurgitation of the Resistance talking point that Trump views himself as above the law.

As detailed in the Mueller report, he received help from a foreign adversary in 2016 without legal consequence.

What in the world? What are Philip Rucker, Bob Costa, and Rachel Bade smoking? This was not “detailed” in the Mueller report. This is not even a remotely accurate summation of that report, even while acknowledging how partisan of a report it was.

In fact, the report found that the entire basis for the investigation — supposed treasonous collusion with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n — had no evidence in support of it. Not only did Trump not conspire with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n, not a single American was found to have done so. Are they trying to elevate the significance of Russia’s 100-year-old practice of meddling in U.S. e******ns, and falsely characterize those efforts as unidirectional in favor of Trump?

There are countries such as China that desperately want to defeat Trump and had that interest in the 2018 midterm e******ns and in 2020 e******ns. We know that China is actively manipulating its actions to help achieve the goal of a Trump loss in 2020. Are Rucker, Costa and Bade suggesting that whichever Democrat Trump runs against should face “legal consequence” for wh**ever machinations they employ?

It is unclear what “legal consequence” Rucker, Costa, and Bade are fantasizing about, particularly considering it’s a fantasy that even Andrew Weissman’s politically motivated special counsel team couldn’t dream of suggesting.

He sought to thwart the Russia investigation and possibly obstruct justice without consequence.

Here, Rucker, Costa, and Bade blame Trump for not sitting silently while being falsely accused of being a t*****r who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 e******n. Treason is a crime punishable by death, but apparently President Trump complained too loudly about the false allegations made against him for Rucker, Costa, and Bade’s liking.

Through the government, he has earned profits for his businesses without consequence.

The Washington Post has been absolutely desperate to make some kind of financial impropriety case against Trump. The only problem is that they are more frequently writing about how the Resistance has effectively tarnished Trump’s brand globally. The Trump organization is a global business concern that did not disappear when Trump took office, even if he stepped away from running it.

Apparently Rucker, Costa, and Bade think that the company should not be permitted to operate while Trump is in office. It’s an interesting theory.....

Seth

By their actions today, the mainstream media are discrediting journalism as a whole for years to come, if not forever, by violating every tenet of the profession.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

All I get from liberal posters is
https://youtu.be/Re72di5phM0

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Most papers decided to be holocaust deniers, so anti-semites and r****ts are not much of a surprise. It's kind of like which pig can get deeper in the mud.