F**eStreamMedia Whistle Blower Narrative Backfires, Media is Covering Up ObamaClintonBiden'DNC' Corruption
Sep 21, 2019 17:17:55 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Whistleblower” Story – Ukraine Government Initiated Contact with State Dept. Officials first about ""DEMOCRAT E******N I**********E""
Posted on September 21, 2019
Well, well, well… the media cannot say President Trump didn’t try to warn them about throwing f**e-news rakes in front of their narrative parade – then wondering why they keep getting black-eyes. Here we go, the details begin to surface.
With more reporting by John Solomon, cited and attributed to on-the-record officials in the State Department and Ukraine, a much more clear picture emerges. In reality, and unfortunately as expected, the fulsome picture is 180° divergent from the media narrative.
The government of Ukraine under both Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and now President Volodymyr Zelensky, had been trying to deliver information about Obama officials and Democrat party officials (DNC on behalf of Hillary Clinton) requesting the government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 e******n.
Both Poroshenko and Zelensky administrations had tried, unsuccessfully, to get information to current U.S. officials. U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine were refusing to give visa’s to Ukrainian emissaries because they did not want the damaging information sent to the President Trump administration.
Failing to get help from the U.S. State Department, the Ukranians tried a workaround, and hired a respected U.S. lawyer to hand deliver the documentary evidence directly to the U.S. Department of Justice. The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the U.S. Department of Justice in New York.
However, after delivering the information and not hearing back from the U.S. government, the Ukrainian government, now led by President Zelensky, interpreted the silence as the Trump administration and U.S. government (writ large) being upset about the Ukraine involvement overall. Out of concern for a serious diplomatic breakdown, the Zelensky administration made a personal request to the U.S. State Department for assistance.
The U.S. State Department then reached out to Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani; and asked him if he would meet with Zelensky’s top lawyer, Andrei Yermak.
Rudy Giuliani agreed to act as a diplomatic intermediary and met with Yermak in Spain. After the meeting, Mr. Giuliani then contacted the State Department Officials in charge of Ukraine and Europe and debriefed them on the totality of the subject matter as relayed by Andrei Yermak.
All of this activity preceded the phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
President Trump and President Zelensky discussed the issues, and this phone call is the one now referenced by the concerned “whistleblower”. The “whistleblower” obviously had no knowledge of the background and why the subject matter discussed in the phone call was framed as it was.
Apparently in the phone call, President Zelensky was explaining what action the Ukranian government had already taken to try and get the information about corrupt U.S. officials, including former VP Joe Biden, to the U.S. government.
It was from this clarification of information that President Trump is reported to have told Zelensky it was OK to proceed with any internal investigation of corruption in Ukraine that might also encompass former U.S. officials. Yes, that would include Joe Biden.
From this context we can see how the “whistle-blower”, knowing only half of the information – might incorrectly perceive the conversation. Additionally, there’s a possibility the “whistle-blower” may be ideologically aligned with the same government entities that were trying to block the Ukrainian government from delivering the information in the first place.
The Mainstream Media is complicit in Vice President Biden's shakedown of Ukrainians by extortion and threatening to withhold $1 billion in aide to Ukraine unless the prosecutor investigating H****r B***n was fired. The media is not outraged about that or the highest ranking officials in the DOJ, FBI and CIA using false evidence to obtain FISA warrants, unmasking hundreds of innocent Americans and attempting to frame the President of the United States and his family members for a crime he that not only didn’t commit but a crime that never even happened.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-pounces-biden-ukraine-scandal-whistleblower-story-flips-dems
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/21/despite-warnings-media-steps-on-a-rake-with-whistleblower-story-ukraine-government-initiated-contact-giuliani-engagement-was-requested-by-state-dept-officials/#more-171481
https://www.infowars.com/trump-dems-want-to-stay-clear-of-bidens-demand-to-fire-ukrainian-prosecutor-investigating-his-son/
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/462422-missing-piece-to-the-ukraine-puzzle-state-departments-overture-to-rudy
Posted on September 21, 2019
Well, well, well… the media cannot say President Trump didn’t try to warn them about throwing f**e-news rakes in front of their narrative parade – then wondering why they keep getting black-eyes. Here we go, the details begin to surface.
With more reporting by John Solomon, cited and attributed to on-the-record officials in the State Department and Ukraine, a much more clear picture emerges. In reality, and unfortunately as expected, the fulsome picture is 180° divergent from the media narrative.
The government of Ukraine under both Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and now President Volodymyr Zelensky, had been trying to deliver information about Obama officials and Democrat party officials (DNC on behalf of Hillary Clinton) requesting the government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 e******n.
Both Poroshenko and Zelensky administrations had tried, unsuccessfully, to get information to current U.S. officials. U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine were refusing to give visa’s to Ukrainian emissaries because they did not want the damaging information sent to the President Trump administration.
Failing to get help from the U.S. State Department, the Ukranians tried a workaround, and hired a respected U.S. lawyer to hand deliver the documentary evidence directly to the U.S. Department of Justice. The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the U.S. Department of Justice in New York.
However, after delivering the information and not hearing back from the U.S. government, the Ukrainian government, now led by President Zelensky, interpreted the silence as the Trump administration and U.S. government (writ large) being upset about the Ukraine involvement overall. Out of concern for a serious diplomatic breakdown, the Zelensky administration made a personal request to the U.S. State Department for assistance.
The U.S. State Department then reached out to Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani; and asked him if he would meet with Zelensky’s top lawyer, Andrei Yermak.
Rudy Giuliani agreed to act as a diplomatic intermediary and met with Yermak in Spain. After the meeting, Mr. Giuliani then contacted the State Department Officials in charge of Ukraine and Europe and debriefed them on the totality of the subject matter as relayed by Andrei Yermak.
All of this activity preceded the phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
President Trump and President Zelensky discussed the issues, and this phone call is the one now referenced by the concerned “whistleblower”. The “whistleblower” obviously had no knowledge of the background and why the subject matter discussed in the phone call was framed as it was.
Apparently in the phone call, President Zelensky was explaining what action the Ukranian government had already taken to try and get the information about corrupt U.S. officials, including former VP Joe Biden, to the U.S. government.
It was from this clarification of information that President Trump is reported to have told Zelensky it was OK to proceed with any internal investigation of corruption in Ukraine that might also encompass former U.S. officials. Yes, that would include Joe Biden.
From this context we can see how the “whistle-blower”, knowing only half of the information – might incorrectly perceive the conversation. Additionally, there’s a possibility the “whistle-blower” may be ideologically aligned with the same government entities that were trying to block the Ukrainian government from delivering the information in the first place.
The Mainstream Media is complicit in Vice President Biden's shakedown of Ukrainians by extortion and threatening to withhold $1 billion in aide to Ukraine unless the prosecutor investigating H****r B***n was fired. The media is not outraged about that or the highest ranking officials in the DOJ, FBI and CIA using false evidence to obtain FISA warrants, unmasking hundreds of innocent Americans and attempting to frame the President of the United States and his family members for a crime he that not only didn’t commit but a crime that never even happened.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-pounces-biden-ukraine-scandal-whistleblower-story-flips-dems
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/21/despite-warnings-media-steps-on-a-rake-with-whistleblower-story-ukraine-government-initiated-contact-giuliani-engagement-was-requested-by-state-dept-officials/#more-171481
https://www.infowars.com/trump-dems-want-to-stay-clear-of-bidens-demand-to-fire-ukrainian-prosecutor-investigating-his-son/
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/462422-missing-piece-to-the-ukraine-puzzle-state-departments-overture-to-rudy
Sep 21, 2019 17:33:07 #
Sep 21, 2019 17:49:02 #
Crayons wrote:
b Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Wh... (show quote)
A little deflection eh? Nice job. Always helps to coverup the presidents s**t by exposing someone else's...whether it's actually there or not...
Sep 21, 2019 18:32:29 #
It remains to be seen whether the law was broken in terms of whistle blowing, and it doesn't matter one bit what Biden did or didn't do.
Sep 21, 2019 19:19:41 #
Biden is near the head of the long line of Democrats who s**mmed the American people. I wonder what secrets were t***sferred to China in exchange for his sons bonuses and large contracts. Where did the trillion dollars go which were managed by the Obama Administration? Just call it the “Grand Theft Democrat Party”. They are unfit to serve and all must be removed from their legislative positions in the upcoming e******ns!
Sep 22, 2019 08:08:45 #
woodguru wrote:
It remains to be seen whether the law was broken in terms of whistle blowing, and it doesn't matter one bit what Biden did or didn't do.
And yet anything that Trump has done since his umbilical cord was cut does matter. Hmmmmm....
Sep 22, 2019 12:11:02 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
PeterS wrote:
A little deflection eh? Nice job. Always helps to coverup the presidents s**t by exposing someone else's...whether it's actually there or not...
Who's yer daddy now?
Sep 22, 2019 13:25:29 #
Crayons wrote:
b Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Wh... (show quote)
Gee, I wonder if Joe Biden specifically decided to run for President knowing that if Trump's administration tried to investigate his son, he could turn it into "e******n meddling"???
Sep 22, 2019 14:57:32 #
Crayons
Loc: St Jo, Texas
EmilyD wrote:
Gee, I wonder if Joe Biden specifically decided to run for President knowing that if Trump's administration tried to investigate his son, he could turn it into "e******n meddling"???
Biden is not that bright...but was smart enough to cash out thinking the hillbilly would be president.
This is very interesting >>>
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.